Supported by
Trial to Decide N.R.A.’s Financial Future Begins in Manhattan
Attorney General Letitia James wants a monitor appointed to oversee the gun group’s accounts after millions in misspending.
The former board president of the National Rifle Association spent Monday on a witness stand trying to ward off an effort by New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, to have an outside monitor appointed to oversee the gun group.
Ms. James, who was in the Manhattan courtroom, is seeking to give oversight of the N.R.A. to a court-appointed official for three years, a step the group vehemently opposes. Five months ago, after an earlier phase of the civil trial, Wayne LaPierre, the longtime chief executive, was found liable for misspending $5.4 million of the N.RA.’s money. Charles Cotton, who was its president until May, was the first witness as the second phase of the trial began.
New York has special jurisdiction over the N.R.A., which was founded in the state more than 150 years ago. Ms. James had sued in 2020 amid a corruption scandal that upended the association and led to infighting within its highest ranks; its revenue and membership have plummeted.
Mr. Cotton, in testimony Monday, conceded that the case has hampered the N.R.A.’s ability to recruit new leaders.
“We’re not going to attract the Lee Iacoccas while this lawsuit is hanging over our head,” he said, referring to the former Chrysler executive who was a corporate icon of the 1980s.
During his testimony, an internal document was highlighted that underscored tensions within the organization. The N.R.A.’s audit committee, which Mr. Cotton still leads, has “reviewed and discussed” a possible lawsuit by one of the group’s most formidable former lobbyists amid a financial dispute, according to the document.
Advertisement