Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

Subscriber-only Newsletter

Climate Forward

How a Climate Rule Got Watered Down

The S.E.C. was the target of intense corporate lobbying and a backlash from Republicans.

A person walks down a waterfront street lined with burned trees and destroyed buildings.
Destruction on Front Street in Lahaina in Maui last August. No matter what the S.E.C. does, climate disasters are taking an ever-steeper toll around the globe.Credit...Patrick T. Fallon/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

What should companies have to tell their investors about climate change risks?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will unveil its long-awaited disclosure rules tomorrow. They are expected to be much weaker, Reuters reported, than what the agency first proposed more than a year ago, after intense corporate lobbying and a backlash from Republicans.

“The general view is that the rules will be scaled back fairly meaningfully from the original proposal,” Michael Littenberg, an attorney at Ropes & Gray, said.

For the first time, all U.S.-listed companies will probably be required to disclose significant risks posed by climate change as well as their own climate footprints, which are known as Scope 1 and 2 emissions. But notably, the final S.E.C. rules are not expected to require companies to disclose their Scope 3 emissions, which are produced by suppliers or consumers of a company’s product.

During the S.E.C.’s comment period, companies and business groups flooded the agency with a record number of comments pushing back on the rules, arguing that disclosure would be burdensome for businesses and of limited utility for investors.

The political ground has also shifted. Over the past two years, Republicans have waged war on all things E.S.G. — shorthand for environmental, social and governance principles in business.

Even though the S.E.C. has watered down its initial proposal, right-wing critics will almost certainly sue the agency anyway — “just as surely as the sun rises in the East,” one expert told our sister newsletter DealBook — as part of a broader legal attack on government agencies and regulators. Climate activists are also likely to file lawsuits, arguing that the new rules don’t go far enough.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT