Scientific Review Branch (SRB) Overview
The Scientific Review Branch (SRB) is responsible for the initial scientific and technical merit review of grant applications submitted in response to NIAMS requests for applications (RFAs), program announcements with special receipt, referral, and/or review considerations (PARs), career development (K) awards, R13 conference grants, clinical trials, and other special initiatives.
This first level of review is carried out by a Scientific Review Group (SRG, or study section), composed primarily of non-federal scientists who have expertise in relevant scientific disciplines and current research areas. Each SRG is led by a Scientific Review Officer (SRO). The SRO is an extramural staff scientist and the Designated Federal Official responsible for ensuring that each application receives an objective and fair initial peer review, and that all applicable laws, regulations, and policies are followed. Reviews are conducted either by a standing study section or a special emphasis panel (SEP) as determined by the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) to which the application is submitted. Select the NIAMS Review Meetings link below to learn more.
Alert: Simplified Peer Review Framework
Learn more about the simplified review framework, which is now in effect for all due dates after January 25, 2025.
Key Responsibilities of a Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Learn about an SRO's key responsibilities
Scientific Review Information for Applicants
This page provides information about the scientific peer review process for applicants, such as when scores are released and how to locate summary statements.
Scientific Information for Reviewers
This page shares information for NIAMS scientific reviewers and potential reviewers who wish to serve on a NIAMS review panel.
NIAMS Review Meetings
NIAMS SRB has two standing study sections: AMSC and AMS, which meet three times a year. The SRB also organizes one-time or recurring special emphasis panels (SEPs) on an ad hoc basis.