Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 6;62(8):1474-1482.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0125. Print 2024 Jul 26.

Outcome-based analytical performance specifications: current status and future challenges

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Outcome-based analytical performance specifications: current status and future challenges

Andrea Rita Horvath et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Analytical performance specifications (APS) based on outcomes refer to how 'good' the analytical performance of a test needs to be to do more good than harm to the patient. Analytical performance of a measurand affects its clinical performance. Without first setting clinical performance requirements, it is difficult to define how good analytically the test needs to be to meet medical needs. As testing is indirectly linked to health outcomes through clinical decisions on patient management, often simulation-based studies are used to assess the impact of analytical performance on the probability of clinical outcomes which is then translated to Model 1b APS according to the Milan consensus. This paper discusses the related key definitions, concepts and considerations that should assist in finding the most appropriate methods for deriving Model 1b APS. We review the advantages and limitations of published methods and discuss the criteria for transferability of Model 1b APS to different settings. We consider that the definition of the clinically acceptable misclassification rate is central to Model 1b APS. We provide some examples and guidance on a more systematic approach for first defining the clinical performance requirements for tests and we also highlight a few ideas to tackle the future challenges associated with providing outcome-based APS for laboratory testing.

Keywords: analytical performance; clinical performance; laboratory test; outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Sandberg, S, Fraser, CG, Horvath, AR, Jansen, R, Jones, G, Oosterhuis, W, et al.. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st strategic conference of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0067 . - DOI
    1. Staub, LP, Lord, SJ, Simes, RJ, Dyer, S, Houssami, N, Chen, RYM, et al.. Using patient management as a surrogate for patient health outcomes in diagnostic test evaluation. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-12 . - DOI
    1. di Ruffano, FL, Hyde, C, McCaffery, KJ, Bossuyt, PM, Deeks, JJ. Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials. Br Med J 2012;344:e686. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e686 . - DOI
    1. Horvath, AR, Bossuyt, PMM, Sandberg, S, StJohn, A, Monaghan, PJ, Verhagen-Kamerbeek, WDJ, et al.. For the test evaluation working group of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine setting analytical performance specifications based on outcome studies – is it possible? Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:841–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0214 . - DOI
    1. Lord, SJ, StJohn, A, Bossuyt, PMM, Sandberg, S, Monaghan, PJ, O’Kane, M, et al.. For the test evaluation working group of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Setting clinical performance specifications to develop and evaluate biomarkers for clinical use. Ann Clin Biochem 2019;56:527–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563219842265 . - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources