Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 20;14(1):11476.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61116-0.

Evaluating human landing catches as a measure of mosquito biting and the importance of considering additional modes of action

Emma L Fairbanks  1   2   3 , Mgeni M Tambwe  4   5   6 , Jason Moore  4   5   6 , Ahmed Mpelepele  6 , Neil F Lobo  7 , Rajabu Mashauri  6 , Nakul Chitnis  4   5 , Sarah J Moore  4   5   6   8
Affiliations

Evaluating human landing catches as a measure of mosquito biting and the importance of considering additional modes of action

Emma L Fairbanks et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Entomological evaluations of vector control tools often use human landing catches (HLCs) as a standard measure of a direct human-vector contact. However, some tools have additional characteristics, such as mortality, and HLCS are not sensitive for measuring other effects beyond landing inhibition. Therefore, additional measures may need to be considered when evaluating these tools for public health use. This study has two main aims (1) the evaluate the accuracy of HLCs as a proxy for feeding and (2) to compare the predicted reduction in vectorial capacity when we do and do not consider these additional characteristics. To achieve this, we analyse previously published semi-field data from an experiment which used HLCs and another where mosquitoes were allowed to feed in the presence of different dosages of the volatile pyrethroid spatial repellent, transfluthrin. We compare results for two mathematical models: one which only considers the reduction in feeding effect and one which also considers mortality before and after feeding (using data gathered by the aspiration of mosquitoes after the semi-field feeding/landing period and 24 h survival monitoring). These Bayesian hierarchical models are parameterised using Bayesian inference. We observe that, for susceptible mosquitoes, reduction in landing is underestimated by HLCs. For knockdown resistant mosquitoes the relationship is less clear; with HLCs sometimes appearing to overestimate this characteristic. We find HLCs tend to under-predict the relative reduction in vectorial capacity in susceptible mosquitoes while over-predicting this impact in knockdown-resistant mosquitoes. Models without secondary effects have lower predicted relative reductions in vectorial capacities. Overall, this study highlights the importance of considering additional characteristics to reduction in biting of volatile pyrethroid spatial repellents. We recommend that these are considered when evaluating novel vector control tools.

Keywords: Anopheles; Entomological trials; Malaria; Spatial repellent; Vector control; Volatile pyrethroid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schema showing the categorisations of mosquitoes after the semi-field-enclosure duration, whether they were offered a blood meal and the corresponding classifications after 24 hours. *Resting alive and alive fed mosquitoes were pooled for the 24-hour assessment. Figure Made in BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Median parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals for the reduction in the host-availability rate for mosquitoes encountering a human protected by the intervention (π), the increase in the rate of preprandial mortality due to an intervention (κ) relative to the host-availability rate of an unprotected human and the increase in the probability of postprandial mortality for a mosquito which feeds on a human protected an intervention (ξ). For ξ, the landing result refers to the Fairbanks et al. method.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The predicted relative reduction in vectorial capacity with parameters derived from the models with and without secondary effects for each experiment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Harrington LC, Foy BD, Bangs MJ. Considerations for human blood-feeding and arthropod exposure in vector biology research: An essential tool for investigations and disease control. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020;20(11):807–816. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2620. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization and others. Guidelines for efficacy testing of mosquito repellents for human skin. Technical report, World Health Organization (2009a). https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/70072/WHO_HTM_NTD_WHOPES_200....
    1. Yan C, Hii J, Ngoen-Klan R, Saeung M, Chareonviriyaphap T. Semi-field evaluation of human landing catches versus human double net trap for estimating human biting rate of Anopheles minimus and Anopheles harrisoni in Thailand. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13865. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13865. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Namango IH, Marshall C, Saddler A, Ross A, Kaftan D, Tenywa F, Makungwa N, Odufuwa OG, Ligema G, Ngonyani H, Matanila I, Bharmal J, Moore J, Moore SJ, Hetzel MW. The Centres for Disease Control light trap (CDC-LT) and the human decoy trap (HDT) compared to the human landing catch (HLC) for measuring Anopheles biting in rural Tanzania. Malar. J. 2022;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04192-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gao Q, Wang F, Lv X, Cao H, Zhou J, Su F, Xiong C, Leng P. Comparison of the human-baited double net trap with the human landing catch for Aedes albopictus monitoring in Shanghai. China. Parasit. Vectors. 2018;11:483. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3053-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed