Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;34(3):498-513.
doi: 10.1101/gr.278382.123.

The genome of the colonial hydroid Hydractinia reveals that their stem cells use a toolkit of evolutionarily shared genes with all animals

Affiliations

The genome of the colonial hydroid Hydractinia reveals that their stem cells use a toolkit of evolutionarily shared genes with all animals

Christine E Schnitzler et al. Genome Res. .

Abstract

Hydractinia is a colonial marine hydroid that shows remarkable biological properties, including the capacity to regenerate its entire body throughout its lifetime, a process made possible by its adult migratory stem cells, known as i-cells. Here, we provide an in-depth characterization of the genomic structure and gene content of two Hydractinia species, Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus and Hydractinia echinata, placing them in a comparative evolutionary framework with other cnidarian genomes. We also generated and annotated a single-cell transcriptomic atlas for adult male H. symbiolongicarpus and identified cell-type markers for all major cell types, including key i-cell markers. Orthology analyses based on the markers revealed that Hydractinia's i-cells are highly enriched in genes that are widely shared amongst animals, a striking finding given that Hydractinia has a higher proportion of phylum-specific genes than any of the other 41 animals in our orthology analysis. These results indicate that Hydractinia's stem cells and early progenitor cells may use a toolkit shared with all animals, making it a promising model organism for future exploration of stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. The genomic and transcriptomic resources for Hydractinia presented here will enable further studies of their regenerative capacity, colonial morphology, and ability to distinguish self from nonself.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of Hydractinia, phylogenetic analysis, synteny analysis, and analysis of repetitive elements. (A) Hydractinia echinata colony (top); Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus colony (bottom). (B) Maximum likelihood phylogeny estimated from a data set of single-copy orthologs as inferred by OrthoFinder2 showing that the two Hydractinia species cluster together with Clytia hemisphaerica and Hydra vulgaris branching next to them within the Hydrozoa. Divergence times were estimated using the r8s program (Sanderson 2003). The age of Cnidaria was fixed at 570 million years ago (MYA) and the age of Hydrozoa constrained to 500 MYA based upon work by Cartwright and Collins (2007). (C) Syntenic dot plots comparing H. symbiolongicarpus with four cnidarian species: H. echinata, C. hemisphaerica, H. vulgaris, and Nematostella vectensis. Colored boxes indicate linkage groups. (D) Stacked bar chart showing proportions of different transposable element classes in each Hydractinia genome using RepeatMasker de novo analysis. ARTEFACT refers to elements often found in cloning vectors that may contaminate sequencing projects. (E) Repeat landscape analysis showing overall a highly similar evolutionary history of invasion of repetitive elements in the two species. In H. symbiolongicarpus, there was a species-specific recent expansion (at ∼10% nucleotide substitution) of LTR retrotransposons.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of orthogroup evolution across a subset of sampled taxa. (Left) Changes in gene family size estimated using CAFE. Pie charts represent changes along the branch leading to a given node or tip for all 8433 orthogroups inferred to be present in the common ancestor of this tree. Branch lengths are as depicted in Figure 1B. (Right) Proportion of input proteome sequences assigned by OrthoFinder to different orthogroup categories. For results for every species included in the OrthoFinder analysis, see Supplemental Figure S16; for the number of input sequences in each proteome, see Supplemental Table S12. The data used to create these figures can be found in Supplemental Table S12. Aurelia aurita Pacific genome from Gold et al. (2019); Baltic/Atlantic genome from Khalturin et al. (2019).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Genomic organization of Hox and ParaHox genes in five cnidarian genomes. Solid lines sharing homeobox genes represent genomic scaffolds. The scaffold and gene ID numbering in Hydractinia genomes are shown above gene boxes. Broken lines depict homologous cnidarian-specific Hox genes. Alternative gene names are shown above gene boxes for C. hemisphaerica, N. vectensis, and Acropora digitifera.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Hydractinia single-cell atlas represented as a labeled UMAP and validation of several cell-type markers using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). (A) Hydractinia single-cell atlas UMAP with 18 clusters (C0–C17). (BF) UMAP expression of select marker genes (left) and spatial expression pattern of marker gene in polyps via FISH (right). Blue staining indicates Hoechst; pink, marker gene. Piwi1 (B) and PCNA (C) expression in the i-cell band in the middle of the body column of a feeding polyp. (D) Ncol1 expression in nematoblasts in the lower body column of a feeding polyp. (E) SLC9C1 expression in mature sperm cells in gonads of male sexual polyps. (F) Nematocilin A expression in a subset of nematocytes in the tentacles of a feeding polyp. Close-up view of tentacles in panels F′′ and F′′′ both show higher magnification images from the same polyp as in panel F′, showing expression is specific to cnidocytes. Panel F′′′ adds DIC. (G) ARSTNd2-like expression in a subset of nematocytes in the body column of a feeding polyp. Panels G′′ and G′′′ both show higher magnification images from the same polyp as in panel G′, showing expression is specific to cnidocytes. Panel G′′′ adds DIC. (H) Chitinase1 expression in gland cells in the endodermal epithelial cell layer of a feeding polyp. Panel H′′ and H′′′ both show higher magnification images from the same polyp as in panel H′, showing expression is specific to gland cells. Panel H′′′ adds DIC. All images shown were projected from confocal stacks. All scale bars = 100 µm. Abbreviations in A: (ecEP) ectodermal epithelial cell, (enEP) endodermal epithelial cell, (germ) germ cell, (ISC) interstitial stem cell, (Mgc) mucous gland cell, (nb) nematoblast, (nem) nematocyte, (prog) progenitor, (sprm) sperm, and (Zgc) zymogen gland cell.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Results from the lineage-specificity analysis using OrthoFinder results and the UMAP cluster marker genes. (A) Stacked bar chart showing the percentage of H. symbiolongicarpus single-cell atlas cluster markers shared among animal phyla. The bottom legend shows eight different categories, dividing the markers into different groups depending on how the orthologs are shared among the species. The “not assigned to orthogroup” category represents markers that could not be placed into an orthogroup. The other categories are markers that have at least one homolog between H. symbiolongicarpus and that category, except for the “symbio-specific” category, which represents markers that fell into orthogroups containing only H. symbiolongicarpus genes. For example, hypothetical marker gene A from H. symbiolongicarpus would be an “other multispecies orthogroup” marker if it was found in H. symbiolongicarpus and at least one animal outside of cnidaria, but it would be a “Cnidarian-specific” marker if it was found in H. symbiolongicarpus and at least one cnidarian outside the Medusozoa. Stacked bars represent the seven major cell types split into nine groups, followed by all individual clusters and, finally, the total genes expressed in the Hydractinia single-cell data set (16,069 genes) and total genes predicted from the Hydractinia genome (22,022 genes). The marker gene count bars on the right indicate how many markers are present in each major cell type and cluster. (B) Histogram dividing the 317 orthogroup-assigned i-cell (clusters C6 and C7) markers by how many are shared by a given number of species. Legend is the same as for panel A, but the following categories are excluded from this chart: unassigned genes (two genes) and H. symbiolongicarpus-specific genes (none).

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beagley CT, Okimoto R, Wolstenholme DR. 1998. The mitochondrial genome of the sea anemone Metridium senile (Cnidaria): introns, a paucity of tRNA genes, and a near-standard genetic code. Genetics 148: 1091–1108. 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1091 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benson G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 573–580. 10.1093/nar/27.2.573 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bermudez-Santana C, Attolini CS-O, Kirsten T, Engelhardt J, Prohaska SJ, Steigele S, Stadler PF. 2010. Genomic organization of eukaryotic tRNAs. BMC Genomics 11: 270. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-270 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradshaw B, Thompson K, Frank U. 2015. Distinct mechanisms underlie oral vs. aboral regeneration in the cnidarian Hydractinia echinata. eLife 4: e05506. 10.7554/eLife.05506 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bridge D, Cunningham CW, Schierwater B, DeSalle R, Buss LW. 1992. Class-level relationships in the phylum Cnidaria: evidence from mitochondrial genome structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89: 8750–8753. 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8750 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources