Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 27;292(43):17928-17938.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.788877. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

SOCS1 is an inducible negative regulator of interferon λ (IFN-λ)-induced gene expression in vivo

Tanja Blumer  1   2 , Mairene Coto-Llerena  1   2 , Francois H T Duong  1   2 , Markus H Heim  3   2
Affiliations

SOCS1 is an inducible negative regulator of interferon λ (IFN-λ)-induced gene expression in vivo

Tanja Blumer et al. J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Type I (α and β) and type III (λ) IFNs are induced upon viral infection through host sensory pathways that activate IFN regulatory factors (IRFs) and nuclear factor κB. Secreted IFNs induce autocrine and paracrine signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway, leading to the transcriptional induction of hundreds of IFN-stimulated genes, among them sensory pathway components such as cGAS, STING, RIG-I, MDA5, and the transcription factor IRF7, which enhance the induction of IFN-αs and IFN-λs. This positive feedback loop enables a very rapid and strong host response that, at some point, has to be controlled by negative regulators to maintain tissue homeostasis. Type I IFN signaling is controlled by the inducible negative regulators suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), SOCS3, and ubiquitin-specific peptidase 18 (USP18). The physiological role of these proteins in IFN-γ signaling has not been clarified. Here we used knockout cell lines and mice to show that IFN-λ signaling is regulated by SOCS1 but not by SOCS3 or USP18. These differences were the basis for the distinct kinetic properties of type I and III IFNs. We found that IFN-α signaling is transient and becomes refractory after hours, whereas IFN-λ provides a long-lasting IFN-stimulated gene induction.

Keywords: Hepatitis C virus (HCV); IFN λ; JAK; STAT transcription factor; interferon; suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
IFN-α– but not IFN-λ–induced STAT1 phosphorylation becomes refractory to continuous stimulation. A, liver biopsies from chronic hepatitis C patients (n = 16) were divided into three groups based on their IFNL4 genotype (rs368234815; TT/TT, TT/dG, and dG/dG). Total RNA from biopsies and Huh7 and Huh7 LR cells were prepared. Expression of the IFNLR1 transcript was analyzed by quantitative PCR. Results (mean ± S.D.) are shown as copy numbers per 40 ng of total RNA. B and C, Huh7 LR cells were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml IFN-α or 100 ng/ml IFN-λ1 for the indicated times. B, p-STAT1, STAT1, p-STAT2, STAT2, p-STAT3, STAT3, USP18, SOCS1, SOCS3, and actin were visualized using specific antibodies. Shown are representative blots from two independent experiments. C, transcripts of interferon-stimulated genes (RSAD2, IFI27, and GBP5) were quantified by PCR. Results (mean ± S.D., n = 3) are shown as relative expression to GAPDH. ut, untreated.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Overexpression of SOCS1, SOCS3, and USP18 leads to a reduction of IFN-α– and IFN-λ–mediated STAT1 phosphorylation. A, Huh7 LR cells were transiently transfected with control, SOCS1, SOCS3, or USP18 expression plasmids. 24 h later, cells were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml IFN-α or 100 ng/ml IFN-λ1 for 30 min, and p-STAT1, STAT1, SOCS1, SOCS3, USP18, and actin were visualized by immunoblotting. Shown are representative blots from three independent experiments. B, Huh7 LR cells were transfected with SOCS1, SOCS3, or USP18 expression plasmids for 24 h. The mRNA expression levels of SOCS1, SOCS3, and USP18 were analyzed by quantitative PCR and compared with the endogenously induced SOCS1, SOCS3, or USP18 upon IFN-α or IFN-λ1 stimulation at the indicated time points. The results (mean ± S.D., n = 3) are shown as relative expression to GAPDH. Protein levels of SOCS1, SOCS3, and USP18 and actin were visualized using specific antibodies. ox, overexpression; ut, untreated.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
SOCS1 is a modulator of IFN-λ-signaling. Control, SOCS1−/−, SOCS3−/−, and USP18−/− cells were transfected with pGL3-ISRE-Mx1-Luc and pGL4-CMV-Renilla-Luc plasmids and, 20 h later, stimulated with 100 ng/ml IFN-λ1, 50 ng/ml IFN-λ4, or 1000 IU/ml IFN-α for 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h or left untreated. The firefly luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase, and the results (mean ± S.D., n = 2) are expressed as firefly/Renilla ratio. Unpaired t test; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
SOCS1 is a modulator of IFN-λ–induced ISGs expression in vitro. Control, SOCS1−/−, SOCS3−/−, and USP18−/− cells were stimulated with 1000 IU/ml IFN-α or 100 ng/ml IFN-λ1 for 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h or left untreated, and the expression levels of RSAD2, GBP5, and IFI27 were analyzed by quantitative PCR. The results (mean ± S.D., n = 2) are shown as relative expression to GAPDH. Unpaired t test; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Depletion of Socs-1 increased IFN-λ–induced ISGs expression in vivo. Control and Socs1−/− mice were subcutaneously injected with PBS, 1000 units/g mouse IFN-α, or 50 ng/g mouse IFN-λ2. The liver, the lung, and the gut were collected 4 h and 8 h after injection, and total RNA was prepared. The expression of Rsad2, Oas1, Stat1, Usp18, and Socs1 was measured by quantitative PCR. The results (mean ± S.D.) are shown as relative expression to Rpl19. Three to four animals were used per time point and condition. Unpaired t test with Welch's correction; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. ut, untreated.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Depletion of Usp18 increased IFN-α–induced ISGs expression in vivo. Control and Usp18−/− mice were subcutaneously injected with PBS, 1000 units/g mouse IFN-α, or 50 ng/g mouse IFN-λ2. The liver, the lung, and the gut were collected 4 h and 8 h after injection, and total RNA was prepared. The expression of Rsad2, Oas1, Stat1, Socs1, and Usp18 was measured by quantitative PCR. The results (mean ± S.D.) are shown as relative expression to Rpl19. Three to five animals were used per time point and condition. Unpaired t test with Welch's correction; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. ut, untreated.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Darnell J. E., Jr. (1997) STATs and gene regulation. Science 277, 1630–1635 - PubMed
    1. Krebs D. L., and Hilton D. J. (2001) SOCS proteins: negative regulators of cytokine signaling. Stem Cells 19, 378–387 - PubMed
    1. Kershaw N. J., Murphy J. M., Liau N. P., Varghese L. N., Laktyushin A., Whitlock E. L., Lucet I. S., Nicola N. A., and Babon J. J. (2013) SOCS3 binds specific receptor-JAK complexes to control cytokine signaling by direct kinase inhibition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 469–476 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dill M. T., Makowska Z., Trincucci G., Gruber A. J., Vogt J. E., Filipowicz M., Calabrese D., Krol I., Lau D. T., Terracciano L., van Nimwegen E., Roth V., and Heim M. H. (2014) Pegylated IFN-alpha regulates hepatic gene expression through transient Jak/STAT activation. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1568–1581 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarasin-Filipowicz M., Wang X., Yan M., Duong F. H., Poli V., Hilton D. J., Zhang D.-E., and Heim M. H. (2009) α Interferon induces long-lasting refractoriness of JAK-STAT signaling in the mouse liver through induction of USP18/UBP43. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 4841–4851 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances