Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Mar; 10(2): 131–148.
PMCID: PMC1338293
PMID: 4962063

Attack, avoidance, and escape reactions to aversive shock1

Abstract

Aversive stimuli are known to produce the behaviors of both escape and attack. The interaction between these two basic reactions was studied with rats and monkeys using many shock-escape and shock-avoidance procedures. All procedures produced attack if a target was present, the attacks occurring shortly after shock delivery. The number of attacks during escape or avoidance was a direct function of the number and duration of shocks received. Consequently, any aspect of the procedure that produced many shocks also produced many attacks such as initial acquisition, extinction, or an increase of the response requirement for escape. The escape tendency acquired prepotency over the tendency to attack since successful escape eliminated attack behavior. The attack tendency retarded escape behavior only during acquisition when the preoccupation with attack precluded the opportunity to learn the escape response. This mutual interference of escape and attack was eliminated when the attack and avoidance tendencies were combined by using biting attack as the shock-avoidance response. The result was unusually rapid conditioning of the biting-attack response. These interactions indicate that both the attack and escape tendency should be considered whenever aversive stimulation is delivered.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • AZRIN NH, HOLZ WC, HAKE DF, AYLLON T. Fixed-ratio escape reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:449–456. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • AZRIN NH, HUTCHINSON RR, MCLAUGHLIN R. THE OPPORTUNITY FOR AGGRESSION AS AN OPERANT REINFORCER DURING AVERSIVE STIMULATION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 May;8:171–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • AZRIN NH, HUTCHINSON RR, SALLERY RD. PAIN-AGGRESSION TOWARD INANIMATE OBJECTS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:223–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • AZRIN NH, ULRICH RE, HUTCHINSON RR, NORMAN DG. EFFECT OF SHOCK DURATION ON SHOCK-INDUCED FIGHTING. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:9–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • BRADY JV. Ulcers in executive monkeys. Sci Am. 1958 Oct;199(4):95–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • CAMPBELL BA. The fractional reduction in noxious stimulation required to produce "just noticeable" learning. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Jun;48(3):141–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dinsmoor JA, Winograd E. Shock Intensity in Variable-interval Escape Schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Apr;1(2):145–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • HAKE DF, AZRIN NH. An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkevs. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:297–298. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison JM, Abelson RM. The maintenance of behavior by the termination and onset of intense noise. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Jan;2(1):23–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • HOFFMAN HS, FLESHLER M. A relay sequencing device for scrambling grid shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jul;5:329–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson RR, Azrin NH, Hake DF. An automatic method for the study of aggression in squirrel monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):233–237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • KAPLAN M. The maintenance of escape behavior under fixed-ratio reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):153–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • REYNOLDS GS, CATANIA AC, SKINNER BF. Conditioned and unconditioned aggression in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:73–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SAWREY WL, WEISZ JD. An experimental method of producing gastric ulcers. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Jun;49(3):269–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SEWARD JP, RASKIN DC. The role of fear in aversive behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1960 Aug;53:328–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SIDMAN M. Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal. Science. 1953 Aug 7;118(3058):157–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SIDMAN M. Some properties of the warning stimulus in avoidance behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Dec;48(6):444–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SIDMAN M, HERRNSTEIN RJ, CONRAD DG. Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shocks. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1957 Dec;50(6):553–557. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SOLOMON RL, KAMIN LJ, WYNNE LC. Traumatic avoidance learning: the outcomes of several extinction procedures with dogs. J Abnorm Psychol. 1953 Apr;48(2):291–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ULRICH RE, AZRIN NH. Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:511–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ULRICH RE, CRAINE WH. BEHAVIOR: PERSISTENCE OF SHOCK-INDUCED AGGRESSION. Science. 1964 Feb 28;143(3609):971–973. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ULRICH RE, HOLZ WC, AZRIN NH. STIMULUS CONTROL OF AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:129–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ulrich RE, Stachnik TJ, Brierton GR, Mabry JH. Fighting and avoidance in response to aversive stimulation. Behaviour. 1966;26(1):124–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WEISS B, LATIES VG. Titration behavior on various fractional escape programs. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Jul;2:227–248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior