Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix multi-threading crash to desktop when publishing ATIS to hub #80

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

justinshannon
Copy link
Contributor

@justinshannon justinshannon commented Jan 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved ATIS timer management and publishing mechanism
    • Enhanced error handling during ATIS data publishing
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined timer configuration and disposal process
    • Simplified ATIS publishing logic

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes in the AtisStationViewModel.cs file focus on refactoring the timer management and ATIS publishing mechanism. The implementation modifies how the timer is created, managed, and disposed of, with a more direct approach to publishing ATIS information. The changes simplify the timer handling by removing an unnecessary boolean flag and ensuring proper disposal of the timer resource.

Changes

File Change Summary
vATIS.Desktop/Ui/ViewModels/AtisStationViewModel.cs - Changed _publishAtisTimer type from IDisposable? to Timer?
- Removed _isPublishAtisTriggeredInitially boolean flag
- Refactored PublishAtisToHub method to use new PublishAtis method
- Updated timer setup and disposal logic

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Timers and ATIS

Tick-tock goes the timer, clean and bright
Publishing ATIS with algorithmic might
Disposed with care, no flag in sight
A refactor that makes the code just right
Hop, hop, hooray for streamlined delight! 🕒


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
vATIS.Desktop/Ui/ViewModels/AtisStationViewModel.cs (1)

1149-1170: Consider enhancing the timer implementation.

While the current implementation is functional, consider these improvements:

  1. Extract the hardcoded 3-minute interval to a configuration value
  2. Add cancellation token support for graceful shutdown
  3. Consider using a different async pattern instead of async void

Here's a suggested implementation:

 private async Task PublishAtisToHub()
 {
     // Publish ATIS immediately
     await PublishAtis();

     // Dispose of the existing timer to start a new one.
     _publishAtisTimer?.Dispose();
     _publishAtisTimer = null;

+    // Get interval from configuration
+    var interval = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(_appConfig.AtisPublishInterval ?? 3);
+
     // Set up a new timer to re-publish ATIS
-    _publishAtisTimer = new Timer(PublishAtisTimerCallback, null, TimeSpan.FromMinutes(3), TimeSpan.FromMinutes(3));
+    _publishAtisTimer = new Timer(async _ => await PublishAtisWithErrorHandling(), null, interval, interval);
 }

-private async void PublishAtisTimerCallback(object? state)
+private async Task PublishAtisWithErrorHandling()
 {
     try
     {
         await PublishAtis();
     }
     catch (Exception ex)
     {
         Log.Error(ex, "Failed to publish ATIS to hub");
     }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 10b1d8f and 7442f44.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • vATIS.Desktop/Ui/ViewModels/AtisStationViewModel.cs (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (cpp)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
vATIS.Desktop/Ui/ViewModels/AtisStationViewModel.cs (3)

66-66: LGTM! Good type refinement.

Using the concrete Timer type instead of IDisposable interface improves code clarity and provides better access to timer-specific functionality.


579-581: LGTM! Proper resource cleanup.

The timer disposal is implemented correctly, following the proper IDisposable pattern by disposing of the timer and nullifying the reference.


1137-1147: LGTM! Well-structured timer management.

The implementation properly manages the timer lifecycle by:

  1. Publishing immediately before timer setup
  2. Cleaning up existing timer to prevent resource leaks
  3. Setting up a new timer with appropriate interval

This should fix the multi-threading crash by ensuring only one timer is active at a time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant