Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Hi Peter, I don't really encourage anyone to play around with two libs yet,
still very buggy.
…On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:25 PM PeterSk ***@***.***> wrote:
Is it intentional that the precompiled, compact version/distribution of
Trealla from "tpl-linux-x64.zip" does not include clpz (and clpb) module?
From a user point of view:
?- use_module(library(clpz)).
Warning: module file not found: library/../library/clpz
false.
But even if I have the clpz module file in the library folder alongside
tpl executable, tpl can't see the module. Unless I run tpl with explicit
path to tpl executable on the command line (or if I open terminal in the
folder with tpl).
Maybe the problem is on my side. Not a Linux "power user", but I'm on
Ubuntu, and I have .bashrc file with the path to the folder with tpl
executable and there is no problem with other modules in this "loading
library" context.
Anyway, I see Trealla as a small, compact, interesting, out of the box
working Prolog; thank you .
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#343>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFNKSEWIROJM3UU35ZKC54DX3QP2HANCNFSM6AAAAAA5BMEWAY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Normally library files are compiled into the executable to avoid path
problems, but clpb.pl & clpz.pl aren't yet because I don't want to sanction
use. I believe it's close to working, there just seems to be the one major
hurdle to overcome.
…On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:25 PM PeterSk ***@***.***> wrote:
Is it intentional that the precompiled, compact version/distribution of
Trealla from "tpl-linux-x64.zip" does not include clpz (and clpb) module?
From a user point of view:
?- use_module(library(clpz)).
Warning: module file not found: library/../library/clpz
false.
But even if I have the clpz module file in the library folder alongside
tpl executable, tpl can't see the module. Unless I run tpl with explicit
path to tpl executable on the command line (or if I open terminal in the
folder with tpl).
Maybe the problem is on my side. Not a Linux "power user", but I'm on
Ubuntu, and I have .bashrc file with the path to the folder with tpl
executable and there is no problem with other modules in this "loading
library" context.
Anyway, I see Trealla as a small, compact, interesting, out of the box
working Prolog; thank you .
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#343>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFNKSEWIROJM3UU35ZKC54DX3QP2HANCNFSM6AAAAAA5BMEWAY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Hi Andrew, thank you for the answers. I was thinking in this direction, but I was not sure. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answer selected by
haijinSk
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is it intentional that the precompiled, compact version/distribution of Trealla from "tpl-linux-x64.zip" does not include clpz (and clpb) module?
From a user point of view:
But even if I have the clpz module file in the library folder alongside tpl executable, tpl can't see the module. Unless I run tpl with explicit path to tpl executable on the command line (or if I open terminal in the folder with tpl). And this is the case even if I compile/make the tpl from the source.
Maybe the problem is on my side. Not a Linux "power user", but I'm on Ubuntu, and I have .bashrc file with the path to the folder with tpl executable and there is no problem with other modules in this "loading library" context.
Anyway, I see Trealla as a small, compact, interesting, out of the box working Prolog; thank you .
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions