Package homepage at PyPI -- Source code at github -- Written by Steve Byrnes

This package implements units and dimensional analysis in an unconventional way that has the following unique advantages:

• Compatible with everything: Compatible with virtually any numerical calculation routine, including numpy and scipy, and even including routines not written in Python! That means, for example, if you have a decades-old closed-source C routine for numerical integration, you can pass it a quantity with units of velocity and an integration range with units of time, and the final answer will magically have units of distance. This extreme compatibility is possible because if the variable x represents a quantity with dimensions (like "3.3 kg"), x is actually stored internally as an ordinary floating-point number. The dimension is encoded in the value as a multiplicative factor. When two numbers are multiplied, their dimensions are automatically multiplied, and so on.
• Modular and non-intrusive: When you input data, you say what units they are in. When you display results, you say what units you want to display them in. These steps are very little trouble, and in fact help you create nice, self-documenting code. Other than that, you have to do nothing at all to pass dimensionful quantities into and out of any already-written programs or routines.
• Powerful tool for debugging: Not all calculation mistakes cause violations of dimensional analysis, but most do--for example, if you accidentally multiply two lengths instead of adding them, the result will have the wrong dimension. If you use this package, it will alert you to these sorts of mistakes.
• Zero storage overhead
• Zero calculation overhead

These great features come with the disadvantage that the interface is less slick than other unit packages. If you have a quantity with units, you cannot directly see what the units are. You are supposed to already know what the units are, and then the package will tell you whether you made a mistake. Even worse, you only get alerted to the mistake after running a calculation all the way through twice.

Therefore the package is not suggested for students exploring how units work. It is suggested for engineering and science professionals who want to make their code more self-documenting and self-debugging.

You can install from PyPI:

pip install numericalunits

Alternatively---since it's a single module that requires no setup or compilation---you can download numericalunits.py from PyPI or github and use it directly.

At the top of the code you're working on, write:

import numericalunits as nu
nu.reset_units()

Unit errors, like trying to add a length to a mass, will not immediately announce themselves as unit errors. Instead, you need to run the whole calculation (including the reset_units() part) twice. If you get the same final answers both times, then congratulations, all your calculations are almost guaranteed to pass dimensional analysis! If you get different answers every time you run, then you made a unit error! It is up to you to figure out where and what the error is.

To assign a unit to a quantity, multiply by the unit, e.g. my_length = 100 * mm. (In normal text you would write "100 mm", but unfortunately Python does not have "implied multiplication".)

To express a dimensionful quantity in a certain unit, divide by that unit, e.g. when you see my_length / cm, you pronounce it "my_length expressed in cm".

Example 1: What is 5 mL expressed in cubic nanometers?:

import numericalunits as nu
nu.reset_units()
x = 5 * nu.mL  # "Read: x is equal to 5 milliliters"
x / nu.nm**3   # "Read: x expressed in cubic nanometers is..." --> 5e21

Example 2: An electron is in a 1e5 V/cm electric field. What is its acceleration? (Express the answer in m/s^2.)

import numericalunits as nu
nu.reset_units()
efield = 1e5 * (nu.V / nu.cm)
force = nu.e * efield # (nu.e is the elementary charge)
accel = force / nu.me # (nu.me is the electron mass)
accel / (nu.m / nu.s**2) # Answer --> 1.7588e18

Example 3: You measured a voltage as a function of the position of dial: 10 volts when the dial is at 1cm, 11 volts when the dial is at 2cm, etc. etc. Interpolate from this data to get the expected voltage when the dial is at 41mm, and express the answer in mV.

import numericalunits as nu
nu.reset_units()
from numpy import array
from scipy.interpolate import interp1d
voltage_data = array([[1 * nu.cm, 10 * nu.V],
                      [2 * nu.cm, 11 * nu.V],
                      [3 * nu.cm, 13 * nu.V],
                      [4 * nu.cm, 16 * nu.V],
                      [5 * nu.cm, 18 * nu.V]])
f = interp1d(voltage_data[:,0], voltage_data[:,1])
f(41 * nu.mm) / nu.mV # Answer --> 16200

Example 4: A unit mistake ... what is 1 cm expressed in atmospheres?

import numericalunits as nu
nu.reset_units()
(1 * nu.cm) / nu.atm # --> a randomly-varying number
# The answer randomly varies every time you run this, indicating that you
# are violating dimensional analysis.

A complete set of independent base units (meters, kilograms, seconds, coulombs, kelvins) are defined as randomly-chosen positive floating-point numbers. All other units and constants are defined in terms of those. In a dimensionally-correct calculation, the units all cancel out, so the final answer is deterministic, not random. In a dimensionally-incorrect calculations, there will be random factors causing a randomly-varying final answer.

Includes a variety of common units, both SI and non-SI, everything from frequency to magnetic flux. Also includes common physical constants like Planck's constant and the speed of light. Browse the source code to see a complete list. It is very easy to add in any extra units and constants that were left out.

• The units should not be reset in the middle of a calculation. They should be randomly chosen once at the beginning, then carried through consistently. My advice on how to do that:
  • For little, self-contained calculations, follow the examples above. Put reset_units() at the beginning of the calculation, then check for dimensional errors by re-running the whole calculation (including the reset_units() part). Note that if you are using from-style imports, like from numericalunits import cm, you need to put them after reset_units() in the code.
  • For more complicated calculations, don't use reset_units() at all. Instead, check for dimensional errors by re-running the calculation in a new Python session. (By "complicated" I mainly mean "involving modules".)
    • (Why does this work? Because the first time numericalunits is imported in a given Python session, reset_units() is run automatically. That happens only once, so multiple modules can import numericalunits, and they will all share a random, but self-consistent, set of units.)
    • (If you want to check for dimensional errors but you really really don't want to open a new Python session, you need to reset_units() and reload every module that has dimensionful variables in its namespace. It's not impossible, but it's annoying and error-prone.)
• While debugging a program, it may be annoying to have intermediate values in the calculation that randomly vary every time you run the program. In this case, you can use reset_units('SI') instead of the normal reset_units(). This puts all dimensionful variables in standard (MKS) SI units: All times are in seconds, all lengths are in meters, all forces are in newtons, etc. Alternatively, reset_units(123) uses 123 as the seed for the random-number generator. Obviously, in these modes, you will not get any indication of dimensional-analysis errors.
• There are very rare, strange cases where the final answer does not seem to randomly vary even though there was a dimensional-analysis violation: For example, the expression (1 + 1e-50 * cm / atm) fails dimensional analysis, so if you calculate it the answer is randomly-varying. But, it is only randomly varying around the 50th decimal point, so the variation is hidden from view. You would not notice it as an error.
• Since units are normal Python float-type numbers, they follow the normal casting rules. For example, 2 * cm is a python float, not an int. This is usually what you would want and expect.
• You can give a dimension to complex numbers in the same way as real numbers--for example (2.1e3 + 3.9e4j) * ohm.
• I tested only in Python 2.7, but as far as I can tell it should be compatible with any Python version 2.x or 3.x. Please email me if you have checked.
• If you get overflows or underflows, you can edit the unit initializations. For example, the package sets the meter to a numerical value between 0.1 and 10. Therefore, if you're doing molecular simulation, most lengths you use will be tiny numbers. You should probably set the meter instead to be between, say, 1e8 and 1e10.
• Some numerical routines use a default absolute tolerance, rather than relative tolerance, to decide convergence. This can cause the calculation result to randomly vary even though there is no dimensional analysis error. When this happens, you should set the absolute tolerance to a value with the appropriate units. Alternatively, you can scale the data before running the algorithm and scale it back afterwards. Maybe this sounds like a hassle, but it's actually a benefit: If your final result is very sensitive to some numerical tolerance setting, then you really want to be aware of that.

• For electromagnetism, all units are intended for use in SI formulas. If you plug them into cgs-gaussian electromagnetism formulas, or cgs-esu electromagnetism formulas, etc., you will get nonsense results.
• The package does not keep track of "radians" as an independent unit assigned a random number. The reason is that the "radians" factor does not always neatly cancel out of formulas.
• The package does not keep track of "moles" as an independent unit assigned a random number; instead "mol" is just a pure number (~6e23), like you would say "dozen"=12. One consequence, for example, is that the ideal gas constant is exactly the same as the Boltzmann constant. There are two reasons for this behavior: (1) If you mistakenly miss a factor of Avogadro's number in a calculation, you will not need any help to see that something is wrong, since the answer will be wrong by 24 orders of magnitude! (2) It is nice to be able to convert between (for example) kcal/mol and eV, without having to explicitly multiply or divide by Avogadro's number.
• The package cannot convert temperatures between Fahrenheit, Celsius, and kelvin. The reason is that these scales have different zeros, so the units cannot be treated as multiplicative factors. It is, however, possible to convert temperature intervals, via the units degCinterval (which is a synonym of kelvin, K) and degFinterval.