Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make kube-proxy ipset parameters 'hashSize' 'maxElem' customizable #129390

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

weak-fox
Copy link

@weak-fox weak-fox commented Dec 25, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature
/kind api-change

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR allows IPSet hashSize, maxElem to be configurable via kube-proxy flags/config.
The following flags are being added:

      --ipvs-ipset-hashsize int32
      --ipvs-ipset-maxelements int32

The default value comes from the previous code:

func (set *IPSet) setIPSetDefaults() {
// Setting default values if not present
if set.HashSize == 0 {
set.HashSize = 1024
}
if set.MaxElem == 0 {
set.MaxElem = 65536
}
// Default protocol is IPv4
if set.HashFamily == "" {
set.HashFamily = ProtocolFamilyIPV4
}
// Default ipset type is "hash:ip,port"
if len(set.SetType) == 0 {
set.SetType = HashIPPort
}
if len(set.PortRange) == 0 {
set.PortRange = DefaultPortRange
}
}

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #129389

Special notes for your reviewer:

The PR introduces new API fields in the v1alpha1 API group for kube-proxy configuration. The changes are backward compatible as default values are provided.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

add kube-proxy flags --ipvs-ipset-hashsize --ipvs-ipset-maxelements to configure IPSet.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API labels Dec 25, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Dec 25, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Dec 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @weak-fox!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @weak-fox. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. area/code-generation area/ipvs area/kube-proxy sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 25, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

This PR may require API review.

If so, when the changes are ready, complete the pre-review checklist and request an API review.

Status of requested reviews is tracked in the API Review project.

@aroradaman
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 25, 2024
@aroradaman
Copy link
Member

/cc @uablrek

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from uablrek December 25, 2024 09:45
pkg/proxy/apis/config/validation/validation_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/proxy/apis/config/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/proxy/apis/config/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/proxy/apis/config/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: weak-fox
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign thockin for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@weak-fox weak-fox marked this pull request as draft December 26, 2024 08:05
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/contains-merge-commits Indicates a PR which contains merge commits. and removed cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 26, 2024
1. Change `MaxElem` to `MaxElements`
2. Change `IPVSIPSetConfiguration` to `KubeProxyIPSetConfiguration`;
3. Resolved inconsistent variable names in comments
@weak-fox weak-fox force-pushed the make_ipset_param_customizable branch from f2a1b40 to d98c544 Compare December 26, 2024 08:15
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/contains-merge-commits Indicates a PR which contains merge commits. labels Dec 26, 2024
@weak-fox
Copy link
Author

/retest-required

@weak-fox weak-fox marked this pull request as ready for review December 26, 2024 09:44
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 26, 2024
@weak-fox weak-fox requested a review from aroradaman December 26, 2024 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/code-generation area/ipvs area/kube-proxy cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make kube-proxy ipset parameters 'hashSize' and 'maxElem' customizable
4 participants