Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

net-misc/seafile & net-misc/seafile-client: bump to version 9.0.11 #40268

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

clan
Copy link
Contributor

@clan clan commented Jan 23, 2025

for seafile-client: qtwebengine 6 is required if using qt6, see CMakeLists.txt

Please check all the boxes that apply:

  • I can submit this contribution in agreement with the Copyright Policy.
  • I have certified the above via adding a Signed-off-by line to every commit in the pull request.
  • This contribution has not been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence tools, in accordance with the AI policy.
  • I have run pkgcheck scan --commits --net to check for issues with my commits.

Please note that all boxes must be checked for the pull request to be merged.

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @clan
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: net-misc/seafile, net-misc/seafile-client

net-misc/seafile: @gentoo/proxy-maint (maintainer needed)
net-misc/seafile-client: @gentoo/proxy-maint (maintainer needed)

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 926674


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added maintainer-needed There is at least one affected package with no maintainer. Review it if you can. assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Jan 23, 2025
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2025-01-23 11:50 UTC
Newest commit scanned: a2bb3a9
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/f2e1606/output.html

KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86"
REQUIRED_USE="${PYTHON_REQUIRED_USE}"

RDEPEND="${PYTHON_DEPS}
Copy link
Contributor

@PPN-SD PPN-SD Jan 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

argon2 required since 9.0.10

Suggested change
RDEPEND="${PYTHON_DEPS}
RDEPEND="${PYTHON_DEPS}
app-crypt/argon2

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

Comment on lines 26 to 30
dev-qt/qtcore:5
dev-qt/qtdbus:5
dev-qt/qtgui:5
dev-qt/qtnetwork:5
dev-qt/qtwidgets:5
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
dev-qt/qtcore:5
dev-qt/qtdbus:5
dev-qt/qtgui:5
dev-qt/qtnetwork:5
dev-qt/qtwidgets:5
dev-qt/qtbase:6[dbus,gui,network,ssl,widgets]
dev-qt/qtwebengine:6[widgets]
dev-qt/qt5compat:6

Why not switch to Qt6 ? Build is ok with -DQT_VERSION_MAJOR=6. Only test failed (still Qt5).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it seems test failed for current stable version too, so I'll switch to qt6

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it seems test failed for current stable version too.

Maybe restrict it then.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no such thing as a half-switch, anyway. The first version of your PR, switching only dev-qt/qtwebengine to SLOT 6, would not have worked at all.

How did you test that?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, I did test and run it on my side, it did works IIRC. maybe my test PC have all the relevant packages installed, that's also the reason why argon2 is missed before (can be found by read git diff though); and thanks @PPN-SD 's point out, I understand more on the difference between qt5 & 6.

BTW, I'm new to qt, I know this is not the reason to made some silly mistakes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@clan clan Jan 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI: I did a test for the first version from a new chroot environment from stage3, "dev-qt/qt5compat:6" and "dev-qt/qttools:6[linguist]" are missing, qtbase6 is pulled in by qtwebengine, the unremoved qt5 dependencies are redunant.

Signed-off-by: Z. Liu <zhixu.liu@gmail.com>
Comment on lines 34 to 36
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
test? ( dev-qt/qttest:5 )"
BDEPEND="dev-qt/linguist-tools:5"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}
test? ( dev-qt/qttest:5 )"
BDEPEND="dev-qt/linguist-tools:5"
DEPEND="${RDEPEND}"
BDEPEND="dev-qt/qttools:6[linguist]"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

others Qt6 deps.


PATCHES=(
"${FILESDIR}/${PN}-9.0.11-select-qt6.patch"
"${FILESDIR}/${PN}-7.0.9-qt-5.15.patch"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"${FILESDIR}/${PN}-7.0.9-qt-5.15.patch"

Merged

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2025-01-23 16:00 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 284cfb1
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/ef720f8/output.html

1. qtwebengine is required if using Qt6
2. switch depend to Qt6
3. drop ~x86 KEYWORDS because of qtwebengine
4. remove USE="test", to be fixed

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926674
Signed-off-by: Z. Liu <zhixu.liu@gmail.com>
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2025-01-23 17:55 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 21178f8
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1c3b225/output.html

@clan
Copy link
Contributor Author

clan commented Jan 25, 2025

if anyone else want to be the maintainer of this package, feel free to take it, thanks.

BTW: test is removed in this PR, I can't make it success yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. maintainer-needed There is at least one affected package with no maintainer. Review it if you can.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants