You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could the packages/install target work with custom git repos?
Use Case
I was playing with idea of having a fork of https://github.com/cloudposse/packages.
In general I like the idea of submitting PR's back to this repo, but wondering if these will get a bit too specific to my own use-cases. For now I've got my own fork that I would like to use with build-harness to install packages for my project needs.
Describe Ideal Solution
Would love to set an variable in the top-level build-harnessMakefile that could control this:
Currently I do this as a module override, but it generates a lot of noise:
... /build-harness-extensions/modules/packages/Makefile:9: warning: overriding recipe for target 'packages/install'
... /build-harness/modules/packages/Makefile:15: warning: ignoring old recipe for target 'packages/install'
Questions
1 - Is there any way to avoid printing out those warnings when overriding recipes?
2 - Would you accept a PR for making package-vendor/repo configurable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the Feature
Could the
packages/install
target work with custom git repos?Use Case
I was playing with idea of having a fork of
https://github.com/cloudposse/packages
.In general I like the idea of submitting PR's back to this repo, but wondering if these will get a bit too specific to my own use-cases. For now I've got my own fork that I would like to use with build-harness to install packages for my project needs.
Describe Ideal Solution
Would love to set an variable in the top-level build-harness
Makefile
that could control this:Then in the
modules/packages/install
Currently I do this as a module override, but it generates a lot of noise:
Questions
1 - Is there any way to avoid printing out those warnings when overriding recipes?
2 - Would you accept a PR for making package-vendor/repo configurable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: