Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test cases for OGC Test Suit #391

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: 317-add-tests-for-the-ogc-kml-22-conformance-test-suite
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

apurvabanka
Copy link
Contributor

@apurvabanka apurvabanka commented Nov 20, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

Introduce test cases for OGC KML conformance and update test dependencies.

Build:

  • Add 'xmldiff' to the list of test dependencies in the pyproject.toml file.

Tests:

  • Add new test cases for OGC KML conformance, including tests for document cleanliness, empty placemarks, deprecated documents, places, KML samples, and linear rings with 1D tuples.

Copy link

semanticdiff-com bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Changed Files
File Status
  tests/ogc_conformance/ogc_kml_test.py  2% smaller
  pyproject.toml Unsupported file format

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Nov 20, 2024

Hello @apurvabanka! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

Line 20:9: F841 local variable 'formatter' is assigned to but never used
Line 24:9: F841 local variable 'diff' is assigned to but never used
Line 35:9: F841 local variable 'formatter' is assigned to but never used
Line 50:9: F841 local variable 'formatter' is assigned to but never used
Line 54:9: F841 local variable 'diff' is assigned to but never used
Line 85:9: F841 local variable 'diff' is assigned to but never used
Line 102:9: F841 local variable 'diff' is assigned to but never used
Line 121:1: W391 blank line at end of file
Line 121:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace

Comment last updated at 2024-12-24 12:46:12 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR adds test cases for OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium) KML compliance testing. The implementation includes various test cases that validate KML document parsing, serialization, and schema validation using the fastkml library. The tests compare parsed and serialized KML documents with expected XML outputs using xmldiff for comparison.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added new dependency for XML comparison
  • Added xmldiff package to the test dependencies
pyproject.toml
Implemented OGC KML test suite
  • Created test class TestLxml extending from base Lxml class
  • Added test for clean document parsing and validation
  • Added test for empty placemark without ID
  • Added test for deprecated document handling
  • Added test for document places with precision handling
  • Added test for KML samples parsing and validation
  • Added test for LinearRing with 1D tuple handling
  • Implemented bulk KML sample file testing from models directory
tests/ogc_conformance/ogc_kml_test.py

Possibly linked issues


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

Preparing review...

1 similar comment
Copy link

Preparing review...

@cleder cleder changed the base branch from develop to 317-add-tests-for-the-ogc-kml-22-conformance-test-suite November 21, 2024 09:19
@cleder cleder requested a review from Copilot November 21, 2024 12:12
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 suggestions.

assert fastkml.validator.validate(file_to_validate=clean_doc)
assert fastkml.validator.validate(element=doc.etree_element())

def test_docunemt_empty_placemark_without_id(self) -> None:
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Nov 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The method name 'test_docunemt_empty_placemark_without_id' contains a typo. It should be 'test_document_empty_placemark_without_id'.

Suggested change
def test_docunemt_empty_placemark_without_id(self) -> None:
def test_document_empty_placemark_without_id(self) -> None:

Copilot is powered by AI, so mistakes are possible. Review output carefully before use.

Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
expected_xml,
)

# assert diff is None
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Nov 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commented-out assertion should either be removed or uncommented and corrected to 'assert diff == []' to be consistent with other tests.

Suggested change
# assert diff is None
assert diff == []

Copilot is powered by AI, so mistakes are possible. Review output carefully before use.

Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options

# assert diff is None
assert fastkml.validator.validate(file_to_validate=linearring_1d_tuples)
# assert fastkml.validate.validate(element=doc.etree_element())
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Nov 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The commented-out assertion should either be removed or uncommented and corrected to 'assert fastkml.validator.validate(element=doc.etree_element())'.

Suggested change
# assert fastkml.validate.validate(element=doc.etree_element())
assert fastkml.validator.validate(element=doc.etree_element())

Copilot is powered by AI, so mistakes are possible. Review output carefully before use.

Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Summary

This PR adds OGC KML conformance test cases and test data to validate KML 2.2 document handling, focusing on parsing and validation capabilities.

  • Fixed typo in test method name test_docunemt_empty_placemark_without_id should be test_document_empty_placemark_without_id
  • Unused formatter objects created in multiple test methods need to be removed or utilized
  • Test class docstring incorrectly states "Test with the standard library" when using lxml
  • Missing assertion for diff result in test_document_clean method
  • Several commented-out assertions (# assert diff is None) should be properly implemented or removed

💡 (1/5) You can manually trigger the bot by mentioning @greptileai in a comment!

2 file(s) reviewed, 5 comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Comment on lines +14 to +15
class TestLxml(Lxml):
"""Test with the standard library."""
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logic: Class docstring is incorrect - this tests with lxml, not the standard library

assert fastkml.validator.validate(file_to_validate=clean_doc)
assert fastkml.validator.validate(element=doc.etree_element())

def test_docunemt_empty_placemark_without_id(self) -> None:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

syntax: 'docunemt' is misspelled in method name

Suggested change
def test_docunemt_empty_placemark_without_id(self) -> None:
def test_document_empty_placemark_without_id(self) -> None:

@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ tests = [
"pytest-cov",
"pytz",
"tzdata",
"xmldiff",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: xmldiff dependency lacks version constraint. Add minimum version requirement to prevent compatibility issues.

Comment on lines +47 to +60
def test_document_deprecated(self) -> None:
deprecated_doc = KMLFILEDIR / "Document-deprecated.kml"
expected_xml = deprecated_doc.open("rb").read()
formatter = formatting.DiffFormatter(normalize=formatting.WS_BOTH)

doc = fastkml.kml.KML.parse(deprecated_doc)

diff = main.diff_texts(
doc.to_string(),
expected_xml,
)

# assert diff is None

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logic: Test is incomplete - missing assertions for deprecated document handling


# assert diff is None
assert fastkml.validator.validate(file_to_validate=linearring_1d_tuples)
# assert fastkml.validate.validate(element=doc.etree_element())
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

syntax: Typo in commented validation call - 'validate.validate' should be 'validator.validate'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants