-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Getting Familiar][Refactor] list out hardcodings in the preprocessors #85
Comments
can i be assigned to this one? |
@tuxo any updates? |
Since @tuxo hasn't updated this issue in over a month, I thought I'd try it |
I noticed some other minor issues apart from hardcoding I highlighted under other |
Hi @GeorgiaMayDay, sorry I missed above comment. Will check soon. I hope you've joined over discord as well(I tend to respond quicker there) |
I'm up for this challange, @Udayraj123 .. |
@pranavajith please check discord for my reply. |
Code is updated with some of the hardcodings reduced. New contributors can help here by checking for more hardcodings in the fresh code. |
Hi @Udayraj123 I am happy to help. I will appreciate some resources if possible. |
Hi @esing1201, good to know! You can setup the repo if you haven't and discuss if you face any issues. Please join over discord to get quicker replies :) |
HI @Udayraj123 is the issue still open ? |
Hi @rakeshcj, yes the issue is still open. Most of the hardcodings are in pre-processors that still need attention. Do let me know if you're picking it up! |
Hi Udayraj,
I will work on it and send the pr.
Thanks for letting me know..
…On Sun, 28 Jan, 2024, 5:44 pm Udayraj Deshmukh, ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @rakeshcj <https://github.com/rakeshcj>, yes the issue is still open.
Most of the hardcodings are in pre-processors that still need attention. Do
let me know if you're picking it up!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#85 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKFLMA4GL6JDCRCLE4D2WRDYQY6IZAVCNFSM6AAAAAAQ7GJWSSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJTGU3TMMJUGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi @rakeshcj let me know if any blockers. |
Hi @Udayraj123, I am a beginner to open source, can you assign this issue to me so that I can try working on it? I would appreciate any help/resources if possible |
Hey @Darpana-iitgn, sure! |
Describe the bug
There are some hardcodings in the codebase(some of which are tagged by a todo comment). We need to remove them and pick them up from configuration/command line. The first step would be to list out the hardcoded values in a comment below.
Then we'll break it down into new issues to fix them in parts.
To Reproduce
One example is from
src/processors/CropPage.py
: the parameters passed tocv2.Canny
can be taken from something likeself.canny_params
Acceptance Criteria
A list of all hardcodings should be populated.
Screenshots
NA
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Additional context
NA
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: