Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Followup regarding parallel_stable_sort from boost #219

Open
hendrikmuhs opened this issue May 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Followup regarding parallel_stable_sort from boost #219

hendrikmuhs opened this issue May 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@hendrikmuhs
Copy link
Contributor

see #215, boostorg/sort#54, #218

Due to a segfault in the indexer, we switched the parallel sorting algorithm in #218 at least until the root cause has been found. parallel_stable_sort uses less memory according to the documentation. However we haven't run the 2 in a benchmark. Revisit when the root cause got fixed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hendrikmuhs