Digital Twin ISO 25023 Compliance Test Setup for cloudpoints-based 3d objects -- 2

I'm in need of a professional who can set up test cases for ISO 25023 certification for Digital Twins of 3D cloudpoints-based objects. This project is predominantly focused on: - Compliance certification: The primary goal of these test cases is to ensure that the 3D objects are compliant with ISO 25023 standards. - Desktop applications: The 3D objects are intended for use in desktop applications. - Industrial components: The type of 3D objects we are working with are industrial components. Ideal candidates for this project should possess: - Robust knowledge of ISO 25023 standards. - Proficiency in setting up test cases for compliance certification. - Experience with 3D cloudpoints-based industrial components. - Expertise in targeting desktop applications. The successful setup of these test cases will ensure quality control and enhance the overall performance of our digital twins, paving the way for seamless compliance certification. here’s the requirement scenario; Test Cases for ISO 25023 Based on Given Performance Goals Objective: Ensure that the digital twin system meets performance goals, including high accuracy in virtual-real correspondence, precise 3D scanning, and support for concurrent user connections. 1. Functional Suitability Test Case 1: Verify Correspondence Between Real and Virtual Environments Objective: Assess whether the virtual environment achieves a 90% match to the physical site. Steps: 1. Identify key measurement points (e.g., walls, machinery) in the physical space. 2. Obtain the real-world dimensions and spatial layout using 3D scanning or manual measurements. 3. Compare these measurements with the corresponding points in the virtual space using VR tools. 4. Calculate the percentage of similarity between real and virtual environments based on aligned points. 5. Document the equipment and tools used for measuring and scanning the physical space. Expected Result: • The virtual space matches the physical site within a 90% similarity threshold for all measured points. 2. Accuracy Test Case 2: Verify Precision of 3D Scanned Models Objective: Confirm that the 3D scanning achieves a precision of 5mm or less. Steps: 1. Use a calibrated tool to scan a reference object (e.g., a box with known dimensions). 2. Import the scanned model into the virtual environment. 3. Measure the dimensions and compare them to the object’s actual dimensions. 4. Record deviations at multiple points across the model. Expected Result: • The maximum deviation at any point is within 5mm of the actual object dimensions. 3. Performance Efficiency Test Case 3: Validate System Performance with 50+ Concurrent Users Objective: Ensure the system maintains acceptable performance under simultaneous access by at least 50 users. Steps: 1. Simulate 50+ user connections using a load-testing tool or real participants. 2. Monitor system response times, frame rates, and latency during peak activity. 3. Have users perform tasks such as navigating, interacting with objects, and updating data. 4. Identify any system slowdowns, crashes, or errors. Expected Result: • Average system response time is under 500ms per user. • Frame rates remain above 30 FPS with no crashes or critical errors. 4. Usability Test Case 4: Evaluate User Experience in Crowded Scenarios Objective: Assess the usability of the virtual environment with 50+ active users. Steps: 1. Simulate 50+ users exploring the virtual space simultaneously. 2. Monitor ease of movement, interaction, and communication among users. 3. Collect feedback on user experience, such as lag, collision issues, or confusion in navigation. Expected Result: • Users can navigate and interact smoothly without interference from other users. • User satisfaction scores exceed 80% based on a post-session survey. 5. Reliability Test Case 5: Verify System Stability During Prolonged Use Objective: Test system stability with prolonged activity and concurrent connections. Steps: 1. Maintain 50+ concurrent connections for at least 2 hours. 2. Continuously monitor resource utilization (CPU, memory, bandwidth). 3. Observe for crashes, memory leaks, or performance degradation over time. Expected Result: • The system runs continuously for 2+ hours without crashes or performance dips. • Resource utilization remains within acceptable limits (e.g., CPU < 80%, memory < 75%). Would you like to expand on stress tests, edge cases, or any specific technical validation for these goals?