slrkme

Art itself changes even within a lifetime.

AI generated art is probably not art, but remember photography used to not be considered art.  I think of it as a computer game which usually has jarring results.

AI art has two components of human creativity. One is framing words that result in someting acceptable. The other is finding meaning in that result.

it is the same challenge when reading or writing poetry or reading a mathematics textbook.  If it isn't apprehendable, it is just a random collage.

But I also read tea leaves, divine the future from the images in the dust as I sweep, and watch the auras of passing machines.

I have always enjoyed picking discrepancies in magazines and web images.  In a huge amount of images I see, there is that one person or building who has a different vanishing point than the rest of the picture.

Content I create, I mean me, myself and I doing the creating takes a lot of work.  I will put very little of it on the web.

The stuff spewed out with AI interfaces is glib, easy and prolific.  I don't have any attachment to it.  It, like life is full of inconsistancies. The picture I posted of the angel with the flaming sword is an example.  But it is fun, even if not serious.