I need help editing a data analysis project

I did a work and got feedback. I need guidance and help incorporating it. Attached is the work I did in Word Document, and a PPT I did. You'll also ensure citations and references are in APA 7th Ed. Here is the Feedback: Nothing much was actually done based on what I said last: For example: 1. There is a difference between mediation and moderation for God's sakes....Which one was done? And whichever one was done is an "interaction" and the interaction effects ought to have its own table. I can't see that. 2. Under data, only LEMAS, CLETA, and LEOKA were itemized. You said you outsourced. How about others? How about the sample sizes of each of them? How were the variables coded from them? 3. Now, if you look at page 26 of the report, I can't find the model....and the path (which was a critical component of what ought to be in the slide).... We need to see the Latent Class Analysis (that was emphasized today), how it was done, results, and BIC tests shown in a table....none! 4. About the hypothesis, where is the table of value confirming it, and how was it tested? 5. And for the variables: A. The "community demographics "....where is the percentage table showing this? How was it measured and coded?  B. What is "Community-level disadvantage"? How is it measured in literature? I think you meant socio-economic status and in literature, it is measured using poverty, unemployment, low income, etc....no showing how it is derived and coded! C. Crime rate- what kind of crime? Burglary, robbery....etc. From what data source and how is it coded?  6. And the tables, please you should examine some tables in Criminology or Sociology journals and even from some of the articles I sent....and arrange appropriately.  More: And table 1 result is strictly descriptive statistics. You can use the command: "Corr varibles, m" on STATA so that it will give you both descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. You can then briefly talk about them. THERE SHOULD BE NO MENTION of LCA under this table please....as the current work shows. This should come after justifying and working on the contentious variables and how they are coded. And you should name the tables appropriately Eg: Table showing.... And under each, you can mention source or any other info.. Same with all figures... And in the discussion, you can present results like a discussion. You needn't state the research questions again. You can see such under previous studies such as Li et al, 2021. And, you clearly stated in the slides that the study does not imply causality (which is correct). But the language employed in the discussion outrightly infer causality. Where you needed to use terms like "connection" or "association" or even technical but explained use of "effect," you used the word "cause!" You should fix this please I also noticed some values in exponentioal figures such as 2.4e-11, how do we interpret this? As it ought to be interpreted. Dataset and Stata file will be sent to writer chosen if requested. Please ensure the final report adheres to the APA style guide.