Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump is a past, present and future threat to national security

Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump shaking hands

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the 2019 G20 summit in Oasaka, Japan.

Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

Psychological scientists who study human behavior concur that past actions are the best predictor of future actions. If past actions caused no problem, then all is well. If, however, a person demonstrated poor behavior in the past, well, buckle up. The odds are very great the person will continue to perform poorly if given the chance.

Donald Trump’s past behavior regarding just one area of protecting American citizens — specifically national defense — tells us that if he becomes the 47th president, we’re in a heap of trouble. Examining Trump’s past national security endeavors needs to be seriously examined by Americans before voting on Nov. 5.


A vast majority of Americans recall how Trump cozied up to Russia as our rival assisted in his 2016 election with disinformation, misinformation and propaganda about Hillary Clinton. It’s no surprise that Trump repeated that same behavior when he and his friend Vladimir Putin — who he referred to as a “genius” — had Russia interfere on Trump’s behalf in the 2020 election. As reported by the conservative-oriented Wall Street Journal, election interference by Russia is already being repeated for the 2024 election.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Of major concern to journalists who write for the Wall Street Journal, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation (Murdoch also owns Fox News), is Trump’s relationship with the CRINK nations — China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — and its effect on our national security.

Trump’s embrace of CRINK’s dictators as he plans for another term as president is disturbing as noted by the Journal article.

CRINK, along with a few of their allies, have formed an axis of evil that is in direct opposition to Western power, freedom and democracy. CRINK’s authoritarian-fascism rule is one Trump has embraced by the explicit praise he’s lathered on each of CRINK’s dictators.

Students of history know China has been trying to take control of Taiwan since 1954, Russia started attacking Ukraine in 2014, Iran began its anti-Israel stance in 1979 and the North Korea-South Korea conflict has been in existence since 1950. But Trump is not a student of history or international relationships; he’s a transactional individual who adores power-brokers.

On May 8, 2018, President Trump withdrew America from a 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. How’d that work out? On April 13, Iran launched more than 300 missiles on Israel. This act alone has caused U.S. intelligence services and international officials to conclude Iran poses a significant threat to America and its allies. For the record, Russia has a very large arsenal of around 6,000 nuclear warheads, China has over 400 and North Korea has 50.

Joseph Collins, a retired Army colonel who served as a deputy assistant secretary of defense for stability operations and is lifetime member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is critical of Trump’s record. He notes in addition to Trump ending the Iranian nuclear development agreement, little was gained by Trump withdrawing America from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia, the Paris Climate Accord, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the United Nations Human Rights Council and Health Organization.

Collins contends these series of Trump’s withdrawals has allowed “China and other powers to fill into the leadership vacuum. U.S. security partners are troubled by these developments and see them as evidence of a new, selfish neo-isolationism on the part of the nation that used to take pride in its leadership of the new world.”

Furthermore, Collins has seen first-hand that Trump has a dysfunctional decision-making style. It’s well documented the former president did not have long intelligence briefings, didn’t read detailed briefing materials, misplaced confidential documents, designated some secret national documents as personal, shared classified information with unauthorized foreigners, and made major decisions without consultation with allies and advisors.

In summary, Collins states “it is impossible to give the Trump national security policy good marks.”

Let’s face the reality of homeland security. America cannot stand alone. We desperately need to maintain a solid relationship with our 200-plus allies, increase Department of Defense appropriations and vigorously oppose CRINK’s advances or we will cease to exist as a democracy.

Should Trump return to the White House on Jan. 20, 2025, the safety and security of 342 million Americans is in jeopardy.

Now that you are fully aware of Trump’s national defense blunders and know past actions are the best predictor of future actions, is he our best choice to be leader of the free world? If Trump is elected, you can kiss democracy good-bye and “CRINK-U.S.” will be the newest acronym for authoritarian-fascism dictatorship-oriented countries.

Read More

People protesting with a large banner that reads "Voters Decide"

Protesters in Detroit rally to support the 2020 election results and other causes.

Why the cost of water for poor Black Detroit voters may be key to Kamala Harris winning – or losing – Michigan

Ronald Brown is a professor of political science at Wayne State University. R. Khari Brown is a professor of sociology at Wayne State University.

The threat of violence was in the air at the TCF Center in Detroit on Nov. 5, 2020, after former President Donald Trump claimed that poll workers in the city were duplicating ballots and that there was an unexplained delay in delivering them for counting.

Both claims were later debunked.

Emboldened by Trump’s rhetoric, dozens of mainly white Republican Trump supporters banged on doors and windows at the vote-tallying center, chanting, “Stop the count!”

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman speaking at a podium

Shirley Chisholm speaks at the 1972 Democratic National Convention.

Bettmann/Getty Images

A reflection: How Kamala Harris is carrying the torch

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

As the 2024 presidential campaign season heats up, with Vice President Kamala Harris emerging as a formidable contender, it's a moment to reflect on the enduring power of the feminist mantra that has shaped generations of women in politics: "The personal is political."

This potent idea, popularized by trailblazers like Shirley Chisholm and bell hooks, continues to resonate through women's leadership actions today. It's particularly relevant in the context of the 2024 election, as we witness Harris' campaign and the unmistakable impact of her personal experiences on her political vision.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mail delivery person in safety vest walking towards USPS delivery trucks

A mail delivery person walks towards USPS delivery trucks in Queens, N.Y.

Lindsey Nicholson/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Voting by mail? Election workers are worried about issues at the Postal Service.

Originally published by The 19th.

Top election officials recently sounded the alarm about ongoing delays within America’s mail delivery system and the potential effect on mail-in voting in the upcoming presidential election, a warning that comes as former President Donald Trump continues to sow distrust about how some of those ballots will be counted.

Some people who vote by mail may be disenfranchised this fall if the issues are not addressed, the officials said in a letter to the head of the United States Postal Service that detailed challenges with the delivery of mail-in ballots over the past year.

Keep ReadingShow less
"It's the economy, stupid!"; is written with a neon light in the countryside at dusk
marcoventuriniautieri/Getty Images

Voters views on key economic issues have shifted since 2020

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

This is the third in a series reviewing the 2024 US Celebrity & Politician Warmth & Competence Study. Created by The Fulcrum and the data analytics firm Fidelum Partners, the nationally representative study assesses the voting intentions of U.S adults and their perceptions toward 18 well-known celebrities and politicians.

A recent study of Americans’ views of politicians and celebrities concluded that the presidential election will be decided primarily by voters’ warmth, competence and admiration perceptions of the candidates, not just their specific policies or stances on social issues.

Eighty-three percent of respondents’ willingness to vote for Vice President Kamala Harris is driven by perceived warmth, competence and admiration for her. A nearly equal 82 percent of willingness to vote for former President Donald Trump is driven by those sentiments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Harris and Trump debate on TV
Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images

Trump and Harris vocabularies signal their different frames of mind

Friedrich is vice provost and a professor of sociolinguistics at Arizona State University.

In their campaigns, former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris project different emotions and moods. The contrast between them was particularly sharp during their debate on Sept. 10, 2024.

One candidate made appeals to the past, used more negative words and invoked fear. The other spoke more of the future, used more positive words and appealed to voters’ sense of hope.

Keep ReadingShow less