2015
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing a Video and Text Version of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Intervention for Obesity Prevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: BackgroundWeb-based computer-tailored interventions often suffer from small effect sizes and high drop-out rates, particularly among people with a low level of education. Using videos as a delivery format can possibly improve the effects and attractiveness of these interventionsObjectiveThe main aim of this study was to examine the effects of a video and text version of a Web-based computer-tailored obesity prevention intervention on dietary intake, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI) among Dutch adul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It showed that the intervention (video version) resulted in significantly lower BMI (B = −0.25 with a Cohen’s d effect size of 0.10). The study also showed that both versions of the intervention (video and text) resulted in significantly lower average daily energy intake from energy-dense food products, compared to a control group (video, B = −175.58, Cohen’s d of 0.40; text, B = −163.05, Cohen’s d of 0.36), with no interaction effects of educational level on any of the outcome variables [ 20 ]. Yet, intervention effects of the 12-month follow-up are not yet investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed that the intervention (video version) resulted in significantly lower BMI (B = −0.25 with a Cohen’s d effect size of 0.10). The study also showed that both versions of the intervention (video and text) resulted in significantly lower average daily energy intake from energy-dense food products, compared to a control group (video, B = −175.58, Cohen’s d of 0.40; text, B = −163.05, Cohen’s d of 0.36), with no interaction effects of educational level on any of the outcome variables [ 20 ]. Yet, intervention effects of the 12-month follow-up are not yet investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to ensure that sessions were retained, lectures and graphics representing the statistics, and video clips were used as educational methods and materials, to stimulate learning motivation and attention in teachers [24]. In addition, to share their opinions and experience and to induce active participation, discussion was incorporated into the AOMEP.…”
Section: Educational Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may be related to the late digital inclusion of developing countries, since netizens are more prone to access health information for solving their own conditions in comparison to new Internet users, which usually belong to lower socioeconomic groups (Perrin & Bertoni, 2017). In a second time, the lower level of education can influence the preferences of users in relation to Web media, favoring the consumption of videos instead of reading materials (Walthouwer et al, 2015). This pattern could explain the similarities of YouTube-based searches between both country groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferences of Web users can be influenced by distinct factors of populations, such as the ability of obtaining, processing, and understanding health information adequately (Levin-Zamir & Bertschi, 2018). Frequently, participants of Web-based computer-tailored preventive programs report their preference on video contents instead of texts, considering their usefulness, involvement, and attractiveness (Walthouwer et al, 2015). With a similar way of reasoning, people access video-sharing platforms as open sources of health information (Madathil et al, 2015), expecting to find contents with minimum correctness and clear presentation about their questions (Azer et al, 2013;Sahin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%