2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-013-1772-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion: A preliminary report

Abstract: PEEK rods offer a similar radiological and clinical efficacy as titanium alloy rods. PEEK rods, as a semirigid implant with unique characteristics, may be an effective alternative treatment for patients with degenerative lumbar disease in lumbar fusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also biomechanical studies of the stability of PEEK rods. Static compressive bending (67° displacement) and torsion testing (30° rotation) did not break the rod and did not cause plastic deformation (30). Chou et al stated that there was no loss of stability in PEEK rods, whereas there was loss of stability in titanium rods in a fatigue test involving 90.000 flexion/extension cycles (11).…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are also biomechanical studies of the stability of PEEK rods. Static compressive bending (67° displacement) and torsion testing (30° rotation) did not break the rod and did not cause plastic deformation (30). Chou et al stated that there was no loss of stability in PEEK rods, whereas there was loss of stability in titanium rods in a fatigue test involving 90.000 flexion/extension cycles (11).…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highsmith et al was the first to report positive results in only three patients (17). After that, biomechanical studies were carried out on cadavers and using the finite element model with the PEEK rod, which was compared to rigid systems and measured patient satisfaction (16,22,28,30,37). In these studies, PEEK rods were determined to have several advantages with regard to load sharing compared with rigid systems.…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the titanium rod (114 GPa), the less rigid PEEK rod (3.2 GPa) may alter load-bearing and control abnormal motion, which in consequence may promote the intervertebral bone fusion rate according to Wolff’s law [ 10 12 ]. Several clinical studies concerning the use of PEEK rod systems for fusion procedure are available in the published literature [ 13 16 ]. However, due to their small sample size, short follow-up and conflicting results, clinical outcomes are still controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are attractive advantages of PEEK, such as biocompatible to the spinal cord (Rivard CH, 2002) and radiolucent for evaluation of bony fusion (Ferguson SJ, 2006). PEEK was initially used as intervertebral cages in the cervical and lumbar spine, then rods in posterior and anterior screw-rod fixations of lumbar spine (De Iure F, 2012; Qi L, 2013;Ormond DR, 2015), and is often considered as a semi-rigid fixation which reduces stress shielding (Turner JL, 2010;Abode-Iyamah K, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%