-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize the parse_attributes method to use Source#match
to parse XML.
#119
Optimize the parse_attributes method to use Source#match
to parse XML.
#119
Conversation
lib/rexml/parsers/baseparser.rb
Outdated
msg = "Duplicate attribute #{name.inspect}" | ||
raise REXML::ParseException.new(msg, @source, self) | ||
end | ||
if attributes[name] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why did you change .has_key?
to []
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed it to attributes[name]
rather than attributes.has_key?(name)
because it is faster to process and shorter to write.
Should I not have mixed it with this PR?
$ cat benchmark/attributes.yaml
loop_count: 100000
contexts:
- name: No YJIT
prelude: |
$LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib"))
require 'rexml'
- name: YJIT
prelude: |
$LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib"))
require 'rexml'
RubyVM::YJIT.enable
prelude: |
attributes = {}
name = :a
benchmark:
'attributes[name]' : attributes[name]
'attributes.has_key?(name)' : attributes.has_key?(name)
$ benchmark-driver benchmark/attributes.yaml
Calculating -------------------------------------
No YJIT YJIT
attributes[name] 51.680M 54.437M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.001935s 0.001837s
attributes.has_key?(name) 46.019M 45.683M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.002173s 0.002189s
Comparison:
attributes[name]
YJIT: 54436580.8 i/s
No YJIT: 51679591.0 i/s - 1.05x slower
attributes.has_key?(name)
No YJIT: 46019327.8 i/s
YJIT: 45682957.4 i/s - 1.01x slower
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh... It's surprising...
Both of them just calls hash_stlike_lookup()
:
Hash#[]
: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/b4f3f3c1031cc9ef5c6741042236db497be6602b/hash.c#L2135-L2146
Hash#has_key?
: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/b4f3f3c1031cc9ef5c6741042236db497be6602b/hash.c#L3671-L3675
Could you split this to another PR for now? I want to take a look at it later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I See.
cce06cd
to
7137490
Compare
## Why? Improve maintainability by consolidating processing into `Source#match`. ## [Benchmark] ``` RUBYLIB= BUNDLER_ORIG_RUBYLIB= /Users/naitoh/.rbenv/versions/3.3.0/bin/ruby -v -S benchmark-driver /Users/naitoh/ghq/github.com/naitoh/rexml/benchmark/parse.yaml ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin22] Calculating ------------------------------------- before after before(YJIT) after(YJIT) dom 10.891 10.622 16.356 17.403 i/s - 100.000 times in 9.182130s 9.414177s 6.113806s 5.746133s sax 30.335 29.845 49.749 54.877 i/s - 100.000 times in 3.296483s 3.350595s 2.010071s 1.822259s pull 35.514 34.801 61.123 66.908 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.815793s 2.873484s 1.636041s 1.494591s stream 35.141 34.475 52.110 56.836 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.845646s 2.900638s 1.919017s 1.759456s Comparison: dom after(YJIT): 17.4 i/s before(YJIT): 16.4 i/s - 1.06x slower before: 10.9 i/s - 1.60x slower after: 10.6 i/s - 1.64x slower sax after(YJIT): 54.9 i/s before(YJIT): 49.7 i/s - 1.10x slower before: 30.3 i/s - 1.81x slower after: 29.8 i/s - 1.84x slower pull after(YJIT): 66.9 i/s before(YJIT): 61.1 i/s - 1.09x slower before: 35.5 i/s - 1.88x slower after: 34.8 i/s - 1.92x slower stream after(YJIT): 56.8 i/s before(YJIT): 52.1 i/s - 1.09x slower before: 35.1 i/s - 1.62x slower after: 34.5 i/s - 1.65x slower ``` - YJIT=ON : 1.06x - 1.10x faster - YJIT=OFF : 0.97x - 0.98x faster
7137490
to
a94c5b6
Compare
Thanks! |
## Why? `attributes[name]` is faster than `attribute.has_key?(name)` in Micro Benchmark. However, the Benchmark did not show a significant difference. Would like to merge if possible, how about it? See: ruby#119 (comment) ## Micro Benchmark ``` $ cat benchmark/attributes.yaml loop_count: 100000 contexts: - name: No YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' - name: YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' RubyVM::YJIT.enable prelude: | attributes = {} name = :a benchmark: 'attributes[name]' : attributes[name] 'attributes.has_key?(name)' : attributes.has_key?(name) ``` ``` $ benchmark-driver benchmark/attributes.yaml Calculating ------------------------------------- No YJIT YJIT attributes[name] 53.362M 53.562M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.001874s 0.001867s attributes.has_key?(name) 45.025M 45.005M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.002221s 0.002222s Comparison: attributes[name] YJIT: 53561863.6 i/s No YJIT: 53361791.1 i/s - 1.00x slower attributes.has_key?(name) No YJIT: 45024765.3 i/s YJIT: 45004502.0 i/s - 1.00x slower ``` ## Benchmark ``` RUBYLIB= BUNDLER_ORIG_RUBYLIB= /Users/naitoh/.rbenv/versions/3.3.0/bin/ruby -v -S benchmark-driver /Users/naitoh/ghq/github.com/naitoh/rexml/benchmark/parse.yaml ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin22] Calculating ------------------------------------- before after before(YJIT) after(YJIT) dom 10.786 10.783 18.196 17.959 i/s - 100.000 times in 9.270908s 9.273657s 5.495854s 5.568326s sax 30.213 30.430 57.030 56.672 i/s - 100.000 times in 3.309845s 3.286240s 1.753459s 1.764551s pull 35.211 35.259 70.817 70.784 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.840056s 2.836136s 1.412098s 1.412754s stream 34.281 34.475 63.084 62.978 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.917067s 2.900689s 1.585196s 1.587860s Comparison: dom before(YJIT): 18.2 i/s after(YJIT): 18.0 i/s - 1.01x slower before: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower after: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower sax before(YJIT): 57.0 i/s after(YJIT): 56.7 i/s - 1.01x slower after: 30.4 i/s - 1.87x slower before: 30.2 i/s - 1.89x slower pull before(YJIT): 70.8 i/s after(YJIT): 70.8 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 35.3 i/s - 2.01x slower before: 35.2 i/s - 2.01x slower stream before(YJIT): 63.1 i/s after(YJIT): 63.0 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 34.5 i/s - 1.83x slower before: 34.3 i/s - 1.84x slower ``` - YJIT=ON : 0.98x - 1.00x faster - YJIT=OFF : 1.00x - 1.00x faster
## Why? `attributes[name]` is faster than `attribute.has_key?(name)` in Micro Benchmark. However, the Benchmark did not show a significant difference. Would like to merge if possible, how about it? See: #119 (comment) ## Micro Benchmark ``` $ cat benchmark/attributes.yaml loop_count: 100000 contexts: - name: No YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' - name: YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' RubyVM::YJIT.enable prelude: | attributes = {} name = :a benchmark: 'attributes[name]' : attributes[name] 'attributes.has_key?(name)' : attributes.has_key?(name) ``` ``` $ benchmark-driver benchmark/attributes.yaml Calculating ------------------------------------- No YJIT YJIT attributes[name] 53.362M 53.562M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.001874s 0.001867s attributes.has_key?(name) 45.025M 45.005M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.002221s 0.002222s Comparison: attributes[name] YJIT: 53561863.6 i/s No YJIT: 53361791.1 i/s - 1.00x slower attributes.has_key?(name) No YJIT: 45024765.3 i/s YJIT: 45004502.0 i/s - 1.00x slower ``` ## Benchmark ``` RUBYLIB= BUNDLER_ORIG_RUBYLIB= /Users/naitoh/.rbenv/versions/3.3.0/bin/ruby -v -S benchmark-driver /Users/naitoh/ghq/github.com/naitoh/rexml/benchmark/parse.yaml ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin22] Calculating ------------------------------------- before after before(YJIT) after(YJIT) dom 10.786 10.783 18.196 17.959 i/s - 100.000 times in 9.270908s 9.273657s 5.495854s 5.568326s sax 30.213 30.430 57.030 56.672 i/s - 100.000 times in 3.309845s 3.286240s 1.753459s 1.764551s pull 35.211 35.259 70.817 70.784 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.840056s 2.836136s 1.412098s 1.412754s stream 34.281 34.475 63.084 62.978 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.917067s 2.900689s 1.585196s 1.587860s Comparison: dom before(YJIT): 18.2 i/s after(YJIT): 18.0 i/s - 1.01x slower before: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower after: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower sax before(YJIT): 57.0 i/s after(YJIT): 56.7 i/s - 1.01x slower after: 30.4 i/s - 1.87x slower before: 30.2 i/s - 1.89x slower pull before(YJIT): 70.8 i/s after(YJIT): 70.8 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 35.3 i/s - 2.01x slower before: 35.2 i/s - 2.01x slower stream before(YJIT): 63.1 i/s after(YJIT): 63.0 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 34.5 i/s - 1.83x slower before: 34.3 i/s - 1.84x slower ``` - YJIT=ON : 0.98x - 1.00x faster - YJIT=OFF : 1.00x - 1.00x faster
Why?
Improve maintainability by consolidating processing into
Source#match
.[Benchmark]