-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance version comparison logic for Safety CLI check-updates command #605
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@dylanpulver has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes enhance the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
safety/cli.py (1)
Line range hint
771-793
: Improved version comparison logic and user feedback.The changes in this section significantly improve the version comparison logic and user feedback. Here's a breakdown of the improvements:
- The code now correctly compares versions using
packaging_version.parse()
, which is more reliable than string comparison for semantic versioning.- It handles three scenarios: update available, downgrade available, and already on the latest version.
- Clear and actionable messages are provided for each scenario.
Consider extracting the version comparison logic and message generation into a separate function for better maintainability. For example:
def get_version_status(current_version, latest_version): if packaging_version.parse(latest_version) > packaging_version.parse(current_version): return "update", f"Update available: Safety version {latest_version}" elif packaging_version.parse(latest_version) < packaging_version.parse(current_version): return "downgrade", f"Latest stable version is {latest_version}. If you want to downgrade to this version, you can run: pip install safety=={latest_version}" else: return "latest", "You are already using the latest stable version of Safety." status, message = get_version_status(VERSION, latest_available_version) console.print(message) if status == "update": console.print(f"If Safety was installed from a requirements file, update Safety to version {latest_available_version} in that file.") console.print(f"Pip: To install the updated version of Safety directly via pip, run: pip install safety=={latest_available_version}")This refactoring would make the main function cleaner and easier to maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- safety/cli.py (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
safety/cli.py (4)
17-17
: Good addition of packaging library.The addition of
from packaging import version as packaging_version
is a good practice. This library provides reliable tools for working with version strings in Python.
780-788
: Clear update instructions provided.The code provides clear instructions for updating Safety, both for requirements file installations and direct pip installations. This is helpful for users and improves the overall user experience.
789-791
: Appropriate handling of downgrade scenario.The code now correctly handles the case where the user's current version is newer than the latest stable version. It provides information about downgrading if needed, which is a good practice for maintaining version consistency across different environments.
Line range hint
1-814
: Overall improvement in version checking functionality.The changes made to the
check_updates
function have significantly improved the version comparison logic and user feedback without negatively impacting other parts of the code. The modifications are well-contained and align with the PR objectives of enhancing the version comparison process.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dylanpulver asked for some exception handling. Thanks
083c921
to
d986d19
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
safety/cli.py (1)
772-772
: Improved version comparison logic incheck_updates
functionThe implementation of version comparison using
packaging.version.parse
is a significant improvement. It allows for accurate semantic versioning comparisons. The function now handles three scenarios:
- A newer version is available
- The current version is newer than the latest stable version
- The user is on the latest stable version
The error handling for
InvalidVersion
is also a good addition for robustness.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the version comparison logic for better code readability. For example:
# Compare versions using semantic versioning rules if packaging_version.parse(latest_available_version) > packaging_version.parse(VERSION): # ... (rest of the code)Also applies to: 781-799
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- safety/cli.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
safety/cli.py
799-799: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
f
prefix(F541)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
safety/cli.py (2)
17-18
: New imports added for version comparisonThe addition of
packaging
andInvalidVersion
imports is appropriate for handling version comparisons. This change aligns with the new functionality in thecheck_updates
function.
Line range hint
772-799
: Overall improvement in version comparison logicThe changes to the
check_updates
function significantly improve its functionality and robustness. By using thepackaging
library for version comparison, the function now correctly handles semantic versioning, which is crucial for accurate update checks. The addition of error handling for invalid version formats also enhances the reliability of the function.These improvements will provide users with more accurate and helpful information about available updates, including cases where they might be using a newer version than the latest stable release.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
799-799: f-string without any placeholders
Remove extraneous
f
prefix(F541)
7537f2d
to
18127fc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Summary:
This PR improves the logic for comparing the current Safety CLI version with the latest available version during the check-updates command. Instead of just checking for the presence of a latest_available_version, we now ensure that the version comparison is accurate using the packaging library. This allows for better handling of upgrade and downgrade scenarios.
Key Changes:
Why these changes were made:
Summary by CodeRabbit