-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#688 update copyright #688
Conversation
Starting 3-day comment window. |
Thank you so much for this license change!! May I suggest using one of the following licenses instead of "public domain" just to make sure it's clearly public domain, and so automated tools can reliably pick up the change? |
@douglascrockford In case the above comment is of interest to you. |
I would also like to support using a more common public domain license like CC0 |
I also like a more common public domain license like CC0 |
Some countries, for example Japan, have no definition of Public Domain in law. |
The original author of the application, Douglas Crockford, selected the license. Please reach out to him if you would like to see any changes. |
The JSON license was included for the `org.json` transitive dependency, but that [no longer uses this license](stleary/JSON-java#688). Changes: - Removed support for this license (so that the build will fail if re-introduced) - Removed license text from `thirdparty-template` Fixes hazelcast#25343
The JSON license was included for the `org.json` transitive dependency, but that [no longer uses this license](stleary/JSON-java#688). Changes: - Removed support for this license (so that the build will fail if re-introduced) - Removed license text from `thirdparty-template` Fixes #25343
See stleary/JSON-java#688 for details.
What problem does this code solve?
Replaces license and copyright with Public Domain throughout the repo, per request of the author.
Risks
None
Changes to the API?
No
Will this require a new release?
No
Should the documentation be updated?
Yes - check the FAQ
Does it break the unit tests?
N/A
Was any code refactored in this commit?
N/A
Review status
APPROVED - by myself