Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):6669-74.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6669.

Assembly, subunit composition, and footprint of human DNA repair excision nuclease

M Wakasugi  1 , A Sancar
Affiliations

Assembly, subunit composition, and footprint of human DNA repair excision nuclease

M Wakasugi et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The assembly and composition of human excision nuclease were investigated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and DNase I footprinting. Individual repair factors or any combination of up to four repair factors failed to form DNA-protein complexes of high specificity and stability. A stable complex of high specificity can be detected only when XPA/RPA, transcription factor IIH, XPC.HHR23B, and XPG and ATP are present in the reaction mixture. The XPF.ERCC1 heterodimer changes the electrophoretic mobility of the DNA-protein complex formed with the other five repair factors, but it does not confer additional specificity. By using proteins with peptide tags or antibodies to the repair factors in electrophoretic mobility shift assays, it was found that XPA, replication protein A, transcription factor IIH, XPG, and XPF.excision repair cross-complementing 1 but not XPC.HHR23B were present in the penultimate and ultimate dual incision complexes. Thus, it appears that XPC.HHR23B is a molecular matchmaker that participates in the assembly of the excision nuclease but is not present in the ultimate dual incision complex. The excision nuclease makes an assymmetric DNase I footprint of approximately 30 bp around the damage and increases the DNase I sensitivity of the DNA on both sides of the footprint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Damage-specific binding and excision. (A) Binding of human excision repair factors to damaged DNA. Repair factors were incubated for 30 min with either a 136-bp control DNA or a duplex containing (–4) photoproduct and were analyzed on a nondenaturing gel (lanes 1–14). (B) Excision reaction by repair factors used in binding assay. The (–4) substrate was incubated for 2 h with the five repair factors (RFI–V: XPA, RPA, TFIIH, XPC, XPG) at the concentration used in binding experiment and XPF⋅ERCC1 (RFVI). Excision products were analyzed on 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Quantitative analysis shows that 93% of the damage was excised.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detection of preincision complexes 1 and 2 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. (A) Weak PIC1 forms with RFI-IV (XPA, RPA, TFIIH, and XPC) (lane 2), which is stabilized by XPG to form PIC2 (lane 3). No PIC2 can be detected with unmodified DNA (lane 5). (B) Formation of PIC2 requires all five repair factors. (C) PIC2 formation is ATP-dependent. Reaction mixtures were incubated in the presence or absence of ATP and separated on a 3.5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel as indicated. Open arrow shows the binding by a minor contaminant in the TFIIH factor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Detection of preincision complex 3 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. The substrate was incubated with RFI-IV (XPA, RPA, TFIIH, XPC) and either wild-type or mutant XPG at 30°C to form PIC2 (1st incubation), then XPF⋅ERCC1 was added on ice as indicated (second incubation), and the DNA–protein complexes were analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Detection of repair factors in PIC3. (A) The PIC3 formed with MBP-XPA migrates slower than the complex formed with smaller (His)6–XPA. (B) Antibodies to p70 and p34 subunits of RPA supershift PIC3. (C) Polyclonal antibodies to the XPB subunit of TFIIH supershift (lane 4); monoclonal XPB and polyclonal p62 antibodies disrupt PIC3 (lanes 3 and 5). PIC3* indicates supershifted PIC3.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Evidence for lack of XPC in PIC3. (A) PIC3s formed with either XPC⋅HHR23B or XPC have the same electrophoretic mobility. (B) Anti-XPC antibodies do not supershift PIC3. (C and D) Band mobility shift assays with T<>T(5′-10) “bubble” substrate. (C) PIC3s formed with (lane 2) and without (lane 3) XPC⋅HHR23B have the same electrophoretic mobility. (D) XPC⋅HHR23B (lane 3) and XPG (lane 4) cause supershift in PIC1 formed without XPC⋅HHR23B, but the combination of the two does not cause further retardation (lane 5).
Figure 6
Figure 6
DNase I footprint of PIC2. The 136-bp substrate with 5′ label either in the strand containing the (–4) photoproduct (top strand) or in the complementary strand (bottom strand) was incubated with the five repair factors (no XPF⋅ERCC1) and digested with DNase I, and then bound and unbound fractions were separated on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels; DNA was eluted from the free and bound fractions and analyzed on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. (A) Footprinting gels along with G+A sequence ladder. Solid and open arrows show the site of (–4) photoproduct. Brackets and arrow indicate protected region and prominent hypersensitive sites. (B) Schematic illustration of footprint of human excinuclease indicating incision sites and protected region.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Model for reaction mechanism of human excinuclease. XPC⋅HHR23B is a molecular matchmaker that is not present in either the penultmate or the ultimate dual incision complex. A, B, and D, XPA, XPB, and XPD, respectively; C/23B, XPC⋅HHR23B, G, XPG; and F/E1, XPF⋅ERCC1 complex.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sancar A. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996;65:43–81. - PubMed
    1. Huang J C, Svoboda D L, Reardon J T, Sancar A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:3664–3668. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mu D, Park C H, Matsunaga T, Hsu D S, Reardon J T, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:2415–2418. - PubMed
    1. Mu D, Hsu D S, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:8285–8294. - PubMed
    1. Moggs J G, Yarema K J, Essigmann J M, Wood R D. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:7177–7186. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources