Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 Sep;41(3):303-7.
doi: 10.1136/gut.41.3.303.

Ten years' experience of screening patients with Barrett's oesophagus in a university teaching hospital

C E Macdonald  1 , A C Wicks, R J Playford
Affiliations

Ten years' experience of screening patients with Barrett's oesophagus in a university teaching hospital

C E Macdonald et al. Gut. 1997 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Barrett's metaplasia is a premalignant condition for which screening is recommended.

Aims/methods: Annual screening endoscopies have been performed on all subjects suitable for surgery for many years. To examine the benefits to patients of continuing this policy 10 years' experience of screening for Barrett's oesophagus was reviewed.

Results: Of the 29,374 endoscopies performed over this period, Barrett's metaplasia was present in 1.4%. There was an approximate equal sex distribution with the majority of cases being identified in patients over 50 years old. Thirty five per cent of these patients were suitable to enter a yearly screening programme. During screening, the length of oesophagus involved did not vary over time. As a result of 379 endoscopies performed for screening purposes, only one patient was identified as developing carcinoma solely as a result of the screening programme. Two further patients had carcinoma identified as a result of progressive dysphagia requiring additional endoscopies. All three patients who developed carcinoma while in the screening programme had "long segment" (> 8 cm) regions of Barrett's metaplasia with a stricture present at the initial endoscopy.

Conclusions: The poor yield from this screening programme suggests that the policy should be reconsidered. Resources may be better spent on focusing on patients who present with ulceration or stricture in addition to Barrett's metaplasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
: Number of new patients identified in our endoscopy unit as having Barrett's metaplasia present over the period 1984-1994. Black columns represent male patients and white columns female patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
: Age of patients at time of initial diagnosis of Barrett's metaplasia. Black columns represent male patients and white columns female patients.
Figure 3
Figure 3
: Symptoms or clinical indication for the initial endoscopy which led to the recognition of the presence Barrett's metaplasia. Black columns represent male patients and white columns female patients. GORD, symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Review, repeat endoscopy to confirm healing of benign gastric ulceration where Barrett's metaplasia was not commented on at the initial endoscopy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
: Pie chart showing the percentage of potentially suitable patients who entered the screening programme and the main reason for exclusion in the rest.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Gastroenterology. 1984 Oct;87(4):927-33 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1950 Oct;38(150):175-82 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1985 Oct 3;313(14):857-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1986 Aug 7;315(6):362-71 - PubMed
    1. Gut. 1989 Jan;30(1):14-8 - PubMed

Publication types