Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Apr;152(4):293-6.
doi: 10.1007/BF01956736.

Does constitutional delayed puberty cause segmental disproportion and short stature?

Affiliations

Does constitutional delayed puberty cause segmental disproportion and short stature?

A Albanese et al. Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Apr.

Abstract

We have reviewed the growth of 98 boys and 34 girls with constitutional delay of growth and puberty followed until final height. At presentation chronological age was 14.1 (1.3) years (SD) in the boys and 13.0 (1.3) years in the girls. At presentation all patients were either prepubertal or in early pubertal maturation (4 ml testicular volume in the boys and breast stage II in the girls). Twenty-nine boys (30%) and 2 girls (6%) were treated with either sex or anabolic steroids. Mean height SDS in the boys at presentation was -2.7 (0.7) which rose to -1.9 (0.9) at final height attainment. This was significantly lower than the predicted final height SDS of -1.4 (0.8) and mid-parental height SDS of -0.5 (0.7). Similar results were obtained for the girls with a height SDS at presentation of -3.2 (0.8) which increased to -2.3 (0.7) at final height which was significantly lower than predicted final height SDS of -1.7 (0.6) and mid-parental height SDS of -0.8 (0.8). Both sexes had a relatively short sitting height at presentation; sitting height SDS -3.4 (1.0) and subischial leg length SDS -2.2 (1.0) in the boys and sitting height SDS -3.6 (1.1) and subischial leg length SDS -2.5 (0.7) in the girls. The relative disproportion between the segments had no significant change at final height. We are unable to explain the failure to achieve final height potential and the relatively disproportionate stature. Our data suggest that the late timing of the onset of puberty may be deleterious to spinal growth and consequently final height.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1984 Mar;73(2):185-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 1991 Aug;150(10):708-12 - PubMed
    1. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1988;347:25-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1990 Oct;65(10):1109-12 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Pediatr. 1992 Jan;151(1):15-8 - PubMed

Publication types