Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples
- PMID: 8178788
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117069
Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples
Abstract
Many authors have pointed out that relative-risk estimates derived from ecologic data are vulnerable to biases not found in estimates derived from individual-level data. Nevertheless, biases in ecologic studies still are often dealt with in the same manner as biases in other observational studies, and so are not given adequate treatment. This commentary reviews and illustrates some of the more recent findings about bias in ecologic estimates. Special attention is given to problems of ecologic confounder control when individual risks follow a nonlinear model, and to misconceptions about ecologic bias that have appeared in the literature.
Comment in
-
Re: Ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Mar 1;143(5):522-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008773. Am J Epidemiol. 1996. PMID: 8610668 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Invited commentary: in defense of ecologic studies for testing a linear-no threshold theory.Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):765-8; discussion 769-71. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117071. Am J Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 7710475 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Divergent biases in ecologic and individual-level studies.Stat Med. 1992 Jun 30;11(9):1209-23. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780110907. Stat Med. 1992. PMID: 1509221
-
Re: Ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Mar 1;143(5):522-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008773. Am J Epidemiol. 1996. PMID: 8610668 No abstract available.
-
Bias magnification in ecologic studies: a methodological investigation.Environ Health. 2007 Jul 5;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-6-17. Environ Health. 2007. PMID: 17615079 Free PMC article.
-
Ecologic studies in epidemiology: concepts, principles, and methods.Annu Rev Public Health. 1995;16:61-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.16.050195.000425. Annu Rev Public Health. 1995. PMID: 7639884 Review.
-
Ecologic studies revisited.Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:75-90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090821. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008. PMID: 17914933 Review.
Cited by
-
The association of voter turnout with county-level coronavirus disease 2019 occurrence early in the pandemic.Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;49:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jul 1. Ann Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32951804 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial agent exposure and the emergence and spread of resistant microorganisms: issues associated with study design.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;32(5):581-95. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1795-3. Epub 2012 Dec 27. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23268203 Review.
-
Understanding trends in neighborhood child maltreatment rates: A three-wave panel study 1990-2010.Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Oct;84:170-181. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Aug 10. Child Abuse Negl. 2018. PMID: 30103090 Free PMC article.
-
Designs for the combination of group- and individual-level data.Epidemiology. 2011 May;22(3):382-9. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182125cff. Epidemiology. 2011. PMID: 21490533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modeling type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence in youth: an application of Bayesian hierarchical regression for sparse small area data.Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;2(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2010.09.008. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21505641 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources