Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Apr 29;345(8957):1078-83.
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90818-8.

HIV-1 subtypes and male-to-female transmission in Thailand

Affiliations

HIV-1 subtypes and male-to-female transmission in Thailand

C Kunanusont et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

We examined the risk factors for heterosexual transmission of HIV in a case-control study of couples in Thailand. 90 HIV-positive men and their regular sex partners were enrolled at the immune clinic, Chulalongkorn Hospital, where 92% of male index cases had HIV-1 serotype A (subtype E). Most index cases had acquired HIV through sexual intercourse. 95 couples were enrolled at 15 detoxification clinics, where 79% of them had HIV-1 serotype B (subtype B). Most men had acquired HIV through injecting drug use (IDU).

PIP: A case control study was conducted during February 1992-April 1993 in Bangkok, Thailand, among 62 couples of which both partners were HIV seropositive (concordant couples [cases]) and 46 couples of which the man was HIV seropositive and the woman was HIV seronegative. The subjects were patients in the Immune Clinic in Chulalongkorn Hospital and in 15 drug detoxification (IDU) clinics. Couples in the immune clinic were more likely to be HIV seroconcordant than those in the IDU clinics (69% vs. 48%; 67% vs. 27%, after excluding females who were intravenous [IV] drug users; p 0.01). HIV-1 serotype B (subtype B) was more common among men in the IDU clinics while HIV-1 serotype A (subtype E) (79%) was more common among men in the immune clinic (92%). Seroconcordance was much more common when HIV-1 was of serotype A than when it was of serotype B (70% vs. 52%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; p 0.05). Further, when the researchers did not include couples of which the woman was an IV drug user, the difference in concordance was even greater (70% vs. 26%, OR = 6.8; p 0.01). These differences in concordance suggest that HIV-1 serotype A may be more efficiently transmitted than HIV-1 serotype B. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors of HIV seroconcordance were HIV-1 serotype A of male partners (adjusted OR = 3.1) and history of IV drug use in female partners (AOR = 4.8). HIV-1 subtype E may be linked to a higher risk of heterosexual transmission than subtype B. If so, the predominance of HIV-1 subtype E in Thailand could explain the rapid spread of HIV infection in Thailand.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types