Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 38105638
- PMCID: PMC10764124
- DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0135
Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF), which employs laparoscopic cameras to facilitate a less invasive approach, originally gained traction during the 1990s but has subsequently fallen out of favor. As the envelope for endoscopic approaches continues to be pushed, a recurrence of interest in laparoscopic and/or endoscopic anterior approaches seems possible. Therefore, evaluating the current evidence base in regard to this approach is of much clinical relevance. To this end, a systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the following keywords: "(laparoscopic OR endoscopic) AND (anterior AND lumbar)." Out of the 441 articles retrieved, 22 were selected for quantitative analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the radiographic fusion rate. The secondary outcome was the incidence of perioperative complications. Meta-analysis was performed using RStudio's "metafor" package. Of the 1,079 included patients (mean age, 41.8±2.9 years), 481 were males (44.6%). The most common indication for L-ALIF surgery was degenerative disk disease (reported by 18 studies, 81.8%). The mean follow-up duration was 18.8±11.2 months (range, 6-43 months). The pooled fusion rate was 78.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.9-90.4). Complications occurred in 19.2% (95% CI, 13.4-27.4) of L-ALIF cases. Additionally, 7.2% (95% CI, 4.6-11.4) of patients required conversion from L-ALIF to open surgery. Although L-ALIF does not appear to be supported by studies available in the literature, it is important to consider the context from which these results have been obtained. Even if these results are taken at face value, the failure of endoscopy to have a role in the ALIF approach does not mean that it should not be incorporated in posterior approaches.
Keywords: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Endoscopy; Interbody fusion; Laparoscopy; Lumbar spine; Meurosurgery; Spine surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20385. Neurosurg Focus. 2020. PMID: 32871569
-
Exploratory meta-analysis on dose-related efficacy and morbidity of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal arthrodesis surgery.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):457-75. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE141086. Epub 2015 Nov 27. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26613283
-
Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion.Spine J. 2022 Mar;22(3):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 30. Spine J. 2022. PMID: 34600110
-
Comparison of the safety outcomes between two surgical approaches for anterior lumbar fusion surgery: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF).Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25(5):1484-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4407-6. Epub 2016 Mar 17. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26983424 Review.
-
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications.World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074. Epub 2016 Oct 21. World Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 27777161 Review.
References
-
- Banczerowski P, Czigleczki G, Papp Z, Veres R, Rappaport HZ, Vajda J. Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2015;38:11–26. - PubMed
-
- Choy WJ, Abi-Hanna D, Cassar LP, Hardcastle P, Phan K, Mobbs RJ. History of integral fixation for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): the Hartshill Horseshoe. World Neurosurg. 2019;129:394–400. - PubMed
-
- Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;44:11–7. - PubMed
-
- Chan AY, Lien BV, Choi EH, et al. Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49:E3. - PubMed
-
- Chan AK, Mummaneni PV, Shaffrey CI. approach selection: multiple anterior lumbar interbody fusion to recreate lumbar lordosis versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy: when, why, how? Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29:341–54. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials