Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;149(2):593-608.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04162-3. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Gene signature of m6A-related targets to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in ovarian cancer

Affiliations

Gene signature of m6A-related targets to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in ovarian cancer

Wei Tan et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to construct a risk score model based on m6A-related targets to predict overall survival and immunotherapy response in ovarian cancer.

Methods: The gene expression profiles of 24 m6A regulators were extracted. Survival analysis screened 9 prognostic m6A regulators. Next, consensus clustering analysis was applied to identify clusters of ovarian cancer patients. Furthermore, 47 phenotype-related differentially expressed genes, strongly correlated with 9 prognostic m6A regulators, were screened and subjected to univariate and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression. Ultimately, a nomogram was constructed which presented a strong ability to predict overall survival in ovarian cancer.

Results: CBLL1, FTO, HNRNPC, METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, ZC3H13, RBM15B and YTHDC2 were associated with worse overall survival (OS) in ovarian cancer. Three m6A clusters were identified, which were highly consistent with the three immune phenotypes. What is more, a risk model based on seven m6A-related targets was constructed with distinct prognosis. In addition, the low-risk group is the best candidate population for immunotherapy.

Conclusion: We comprehensively analyzed the m6A modification landscape of ovarian cancer and detected seven m6A-related targets as an independent prognostic biomarker for predicting survival. Furthermore, we divided patients into high- and low-risk groups with distinct prognosis and select the optimum population which may benefit from immunotherapy and constructed a nomogram to precisely predict ovarian cancer patients' survival time and visualize the prediction results.

Keywords: Immunotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Prognosis; RNA N6-methyladenosine; Tumor mutation burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Moody SE, Dunn IF et al (2009) Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature 462(7269):108–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08460 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Batlle E, Massague J (2019) Transforming growth factor-beta signaling in immunity and cancer. Immunity 50(4):924–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.024 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bi X, Lv X, Liu D, Guo H, Yao G, Wang L et al (2021) METTL3-mediated maturation of miR-126-5p promotes ovarian cancer progression via PTEN-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Cancer Gene Ther 28(3–4):335–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-020-00222-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Charoentong P, Finotello F, Angelova M, Mayer C, Efremova M, Rieder D et al (2017) Pan-cancer immunogenomic analyses reveal genotype-immunophenotype relationships and predictors of response to checkpoint blockade. Cell Rep 18(1):248–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Y, Lin Y, Shu Y, He J, Gao W (2020a) Interaction between N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) modification and noncoding RNAs in cancer. Mol Cancer 19(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01207-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources