Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 10:799:149386.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149386. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

Comparative analysis of rapid concentration methods for the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 and quantification of human enteric viruses and a sewage-associated marker gene in untreated wastewater

Warish Ahmed  1 , Aaron Bivins  2 , Stuart L Simpson  3 , Wendy J M Smith  4 , Suzanne Metcalfe  4 , Brian McMinn  5 , Erin M Symonds  6 , Asja Korajkic  5
Affiliations

Comparative analysis of rapid concentration methods for the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 and quantification of human enteric viruses and a sewage-associated marker gene in untreated wastewater

Warish Ahmed et al. Sci Total Environ. .

Abstract

To support public-health-related disease surveillance and monitoring, it is crucial to concentrate both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses from domestic wastewater. To date, most concentration methods were developed for non-enveloped viruses, and limited studies have directly compared the recovery efficiency of both types of viruses. In this study, the effectiveness of two different concentration methods (Concentrating pipette (CP) method and an adsorption-extraction (AE) method amended with MgCl2) were evaluated for untreated wastewater matrices using three different viruses (SARS-CoV-2 (seeded), human adenovirus 40/41 (HAdV 40/41), and enterovirus (EV)) and a wastewater-associated bacterial marker gene targeting Lachnospiraceae (Lachno3). For SARS-CoV-2, the estimated mean recovery efficiencies were significantly greater by as much as 5.46 times, using the CP method than the AE method amended with MgCl2. SARS-CoV-2 RNA recovery was greater for samples with higher titer seeds regardless of the method, and the estimated mean recovery efficiencies using the CP method were 25.1 ± 11% across ten WWTPs when wastewater samples were seeded with 5 × 104 gene copies (GC) of SARS-CoV-2. Meanwhile, the AE method yielded significantly greater concentrations of indigenous HAdV 40/41 and Lachno3 from wastewater compared to the CP method. Finally, no significant differences in indigenous EV concentrations were identified in comparing the AE and CP methods. These data indicate that the most effective concentration method varies by microbial analyte and that the priorities of the surveillance or monitoring program should be considered when choosing the concentration method.

Keywords: COVID-19; Concentration method; Enveloped virus; Murine hepatitis virus; Recovery; SARS-CoV-2; Wastewater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Unlabelled Image
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Virus concentration methods used in this study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Recovery (mean ± SD) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from ten wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) using a concentrating pipette (CP method). Each WWTP was sampled three times.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ahmed W., Harwood V.J., Gyawali P., Sidhu J.P., Toze S. Comparison of concentration methods for quantitative detection of sewage-associated viral markers in environmental waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81(6):2042–2049. (9), 327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed W., Angel N., Edson J., Bibby K., Bivins A., Brien J.W.O., Choi P.M., Kitajima M., Simpson S.L., Li J., Tscharke B., Verhagen R., Smith W.J.M., Zaugg J., Dierens L., Hugenholtz P., Thomas K.V., Mueller J.F. First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: a proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;728 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed W., Bertsch P.M., Bivins A., Bibby K., Farkas K., Gathercole A., Haramoto E., Gyawali P., Korajkic A., McMinn B.R., Mueller J.F., Simpson S.L., Smith W.J.M., Symonds E.M., Thomas K.V., Verhagen R., Kitajima M. Comparison of virus concentration methods for the RT-qPCR based recovery of murine hepatitis virus, a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2 from untreated wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;739 - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Society for Testing and Materials . 2020. Guidance on SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Selection.https://www.astm.org/COMMIT/GuidanceCOVID19SurrogateSel_April242020press... Available from.
    1. Besselsen D.G., Wagner A.M., Loganbill J.K. Detection of rodent coronaviruses by use of fluorogenic reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. Comp. Med. 2002;52(2):111–116. - PubMed