Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 17;36(6):1520-1529.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab026.

Semen impairment and occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in semen after recovery from COVID-19

Affiliations

Semen impairment and occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 virus in semen after recovery from COVID-19

M Gacci et al. Hum Reprod. .

Abstract

Study question: How is the semen quality of sexually active men following recovery from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection?

Summary answer: Twenty-five percent of the men with recent SARS-Cov-2 infections and proven healing were oligo-crypto-azoospermic, despite the absence of virus RNA in semen.

What is known already: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in human semen and its role in virus contagion and semen quality after recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still unclear. So far, studies evaluating semen quality and the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in semen of infected or proven recovered men are scarce and included a limited number of participants.

Study design, size, duration: A prospective cross-sectional study on 43 sexually active men who were known to have recovered from SARS-CoV2 was performed. Four biological fluid samples, namely saliva, pre-ejaculation urine, semen, and post-ejaculation urine, were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Female partners were retested if any specimen was found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. Routine semen analysis and quantification of semen leukocytes and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels were performed.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Questionnaires including International Index of Erectile Function and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire Short Form were administered to all subjects. The occurrence of virus RNA was evaluated in all the biological fluids collected by RT-PCR. Semen parameters were evaluated according to the World Health Organization manual edition V. Semen IL-8 levels were evaluated by a two-step ELISA method.

Main results and the role of chance: After recovery from COVID-19, 25% of the men studied were oligo-crypto-azoospermic. Of the 11 men with semen impairment, 8 were azoospermic and 3 were oligospermic. A total of 33 patients (76.7%) showed pathological levels of IL-8 in semen. Oligo-crypto-azoospermia was significantly related to COVID-19 severity (P < 0.001). Three patients (7%) tested positive for at least one sample (one saliva; one pre-ejaculation urine; one semen and one post-ejaculation urine), so the next day new nasopharyngeal swabs were collected. The results from these three patients and their partners were all negative for SARS-CoV-2.

Limitations, reasons for caution: Although crypto-azoospermia was found in a high percentage of men who had recovered from COVID-19, clearly exceeding the percentage found in the general population, the previous semen quality of these men was unknown nor is it known whether a recovery of testicular function was occurring. The low number of enrolled patients may limit the statistical power of study.

Wider implications of the findings: SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in saliva, urine, and semen in a small percentage of men who recovered from COVID-19. One-quarter of men who recovered from COVID-19 demonstrated oligo-crypto-azoospermia indicating that an assessment of semen quality should be recommended for men of reproductive age who are affected by COVID-19.

Study funding/competing interest(s): None.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus disease 2019; fertility; oligo-crypto-azoospermia; semen; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; sexual transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of screening, eligibility, and the inclusion process for the study sample of men who recovered from COVID-19. Age is in years. CODIV-19: coronavirus disease 2019, SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Timeline in days of the period between the first positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 and sample collection. Urine pre: urine collected before semen collection; urine post: urine collected after semen collection. Timeline (days) from first positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 and the sample collection for each patient. In the first column, the origin of the samples is reported. White box: not hospitalized patient; ‘H’: patient hospitalized in medicine units; ‘I’: patient hospitalized in intensive care unit. Red squares indicate the period between the first positive nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 and the second negative nasopharyngeal swab, while the green ones represent the period between the second negative nasopharyngeal swab and the date of sample collection. The symbols ‘+’ and ‘−’ indicate a positive or a negative nasopharyngeal swab result for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. ‘S’: azoospermic; ‘S*’: oligospermic; ●: sample collection time; #: median proven healing time: 31 days (range 3–65); §: median SARS-CoV-2-free time: 35 days (range: 24–43).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The 95% CIs for mean interleukin-8 concentration in semen of the enrolled patients (N = 43). Data were stratified by clinical management (not hospitalized N = 12, medicine department N = 26, intensive care unit N = 5) (A) and need of oxygen support (no oxygen N = 19, low flow O2 N = 10, high flow O2 N = 14) (B) for COVID-19. The time of collection is shown in Fig. 2. IL-8: interleukin-8. aCalculated using ANOVA test. Low flow O2 Therapy includes nasal cannula, simple face mask, and partial rebreather mask. High flow oxygen/invasive O2 includes trans tracheal catheters, venturi mask, aerosol mask, tracheostomy collars, non-rebreathing mask with reservoir and one way valve and high humidity face tents.

Comment in

  • COVID-19: semen impairment may not be related to the virus.
    Bendayan M, Boitrelle F. Bendayan M, et al. Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):2063-2064. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab082. Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33793791 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Male Infertility.
    Niederberger C. Niederberger C. J Urol. 2022 Feb;207(2):449-451. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002320. Epub 2021 Nov 17. J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34784732 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carlsen E, Andersson AM, Petersen JH, Skakkebaek NE.. History of febrile illness and variation in semen quality. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2089–2092. - PubMed
    1. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU); https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594... (1 October 2020, date last accessed).
    1. Feldmann H. Virus in semen and the risk of sexual transmission. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1440–1441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garolla A, Pizzol D, Bertoldo A, Menegazzo M, Barzon L, Foresta C.. Sperm viral infection and male infertility: focus on HBV, HCV, HIV, HPV, HSV, HCMV, and AAV. J Reprod Immunol 2013;100:20–29. - PubMed
    1. Grande G, Milardi D, Baroni S, Luca G, Pontecorvi A.. Identification of seminal markers of male accessory gland inflammation: from molecules to proteome. Am J Reprod Immunol 2018;80:e12992. - PubMed