Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;19(5):2639-2656.
doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12610. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes

Affiliations
Review

A review of research on plant-based meat alternatives: Driving forces, history, manufacturing, and consumer attitudes

Jiang He et al. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

The topic of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) has been discussed for several decades, but it has only recently become one of the hottest topics in the food and research communities. With the purpose of investigating the current situation of scientific research on PBMA and determining future research opportunities, the driving forces for PBMA development, a brief history of its progression, key technologies required for production, and the resulting consumer attitudes are summarized. Environmental, human health, and animal welfare concerns are the main factors that have driven the development of PBMA. Although its history can trace back to ancient Asian civilizations, the first generation of PBMA originated in 1960s and a new generation of PBMA designed for carnivore was developed in recently years. Structuring methods such as extrusion and shear cell techniques have been widely studied, but improvements toward the overall appearance and flavor, biological and chemical safety control, as well as the selection of protein sources are also very important for PBMA production. The consumer acceptance of PBMA remains unsatisfactory but is continually improving. Based on those knowledge, future research opportunities include developing more effective strategies for consumer education, providing more scientific evidence for the health properties of PBMA, finding more suitable protein sources to improve the quality of the final products, improving the appearance and flavor, further examining and securing the chemical safety, exploring the structure formation mechanism during the extraction or shearing processes, and developing methods and standards for a quality evaluation of PBMA.

Keywords: color; consumer attitude; driving forces; flavor; food safety; history of development; plant-based meat alternative; structuring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aaslyng, M. D., & Meinert, L. (2017). Meat flavour in pork and beef-From animal to meal. Meat Science, 132, 112-117.
    1. Andrée, S., Jira, W., Schwind, K. H., Wagner, H., & Schwägele, F. (2010). Chemical safety of meat and meat products. Meat Science, 86(1), 38-48.
    1. Asgar, M., Fazilah, A., Huda, N., Bhat, R., & Karim, A. (2010). Nonmeat protein alternatives as meat extenders and meat analogs. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science And Food Safety, 9(5), 513-529.
    1. Babu, P. D., Bhakyaraj, R., & Vidhyalakshmi, R. (2009). A low cost nutritious food “tempeh”-A review. World Journal of Dairy & Food Sciences, 4(1), 22-27.
    1. Berk, Z. (2018). Extrusion. In Z. Berk (Ed.), Food process engineering and technology (3rd ed., pp. 373-349). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

LinkOut - more resources