Baricitinib treatment resolves lower-airway macrophage inflammation and neutrophil recruitment in SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques

doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.007

. 2021 Jan 21;184(2):460-475.e21.

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Baricitinib treatment resolves lower-airway macrophage inflammation and neutrophil recruitment in SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques

Timothy N Hoang¹, Maria Pino¹, Arun K Boddapati², Elise G Viox¹, Carly E Starke³, Amit A Upadhyay², Sanjeev Gumber⁴, Michael Nekorchuk³, Kathleen Busman-Sahay³, Zachary Strongin¹, Justin L Harper¹, Gregory K Tharp², Kathryn L Pellegrini², Shannon Kirejczyk⁵, Keivan Zandi⁶, Sijia Tao⁶, Tristan R Horton², Elizabeth N Beagle², Ernestine A Mahar¹, Michelle Y H Lee¹, Joyce Cohen⁷, Sherrie M Jean⁷, Jennifer S Wood⁷, Fawn Connor-Stroud⁷, Rachelle L Stammen⁷, Olivia M Delmas¹, Shelly Wang¹, Kimberly A Cooney⁸, Michael N Sayegh⁸, Lanfang Wang⁸, Peter D Filev⁹, Daniela Weiskopf¹⁰, Guido Silvestri¹¹, Jesse Waggoner⁸, Anne Piantadosi¹², Sudhir P Kasturi¹, Hilmi Al-Shakhshir¹³, Susan P Ribeiro¹³, Rafick P Sekaly¹³, Rebecca D Levit⁸, Jacob D Estes¹⁴, Thomas H Vanderford¹, Raymond F Schinazi¹⁵, Steven E Bosinger¹⁶, Mirko Paiardini¹⁷

Affiliations

¹ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
² Yerkes Genomics Core Laboratory, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
³ Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
⁴ Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Division of Pathology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
⁵ Division of Pathology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
⁶ Center for AIDS Research, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
⁷ Division of Animal Resources, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
⁸ Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
⁹ Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
¹⁰ Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
¹¹ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
¹² Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
¹³ Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
¹⁴ Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA; Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
¹⁵ Center for AIDS Research, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: rschina@emory.edu.
¹⁶ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Yerkes Genomics Core Laboratory, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: steven.bosinger@emory.edu.
¹⁷ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: mirko.paiardini@emory.edu.

PMID: 33278358
PMCID: PMC7654323
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.007

Baricitinib treatment resolves lower-airway macrophage inflammation and neutrophil recruitment in SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques

Timothy N Hoang et al. Cell. 2021.

. 2021 Jan 21;184(2):460-475.e21.

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
² Yerkes Genomics Core Laboratory, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
³ Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
⁴ Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Division of Pathology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
⁵ Division of Pathology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
⁶ Center for AIDS Research, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
⁷ Division of Animal Resources, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
⁸ Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
⁹ Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
¹⁰ Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
¹¹ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
¹² Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
¹³ Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
¹⁴ Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA; Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
¹⁵ Center for AIDS Research, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: rschina@emory.edu.
¹⁶ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Yerkes Genomics Core Laboratory, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: steven.bosinger@emory.edu.
¹⁷ Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: mirko.paiardini@emory.edu.

PMID: 33278358
PMCID: PMC7654323
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.007

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2-induced hypercytokinemia and inflammation are critically associated with COVID-19 severity. Baricitinib, a clinically approved JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is currently being investigated in COVID-19 clinical trials. Here, we investigated the immunologic and virologic efficacy of baricitinib in a rhesus macaque model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Viral shedding measured from nasal and throat swabs, bronchoalveolar lavages, and tissues was not reduced with baricitinib. Type I interferon (IFN) antiviral responses and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses remained similar between the two groups. Animals treated with baricitinib showed reduced inflammation, decreased lung infiltration of inflammatory cells, reduced NETosis activity, and more limited lung pathology. Importantly, baricitinib-treated animals had a rapid and remarkably potent suppression of lung macrophage production of cytokines and chemokines responsible for inflammation and neutrophil recruitment. These data support a beneficial role for, and elucidate the immunological mechanisms underlying, the use of baricitinib as a frontline treatment for inflammation induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; baricitinib; immune activation; immunology; inflammation; nonhuman primate; pathogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests R.F.S. served as an unpaid consultant for Eli Lilly whose drugs are being evaluated in the research described in this paper. In addition, R.F.S. owns shares in Eli Lilly. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by Emory University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. Eli Lilly had no role in the design of this study and did not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results. All other authors do not have any conflicts to declare.

Figures

**Figure 1**
Baricitinib is detectable in plasma and tissues from SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs but has no impact on viral kinetics (A) Study design; 8 RMs were infected intranasally and intratracheally with SARS-CoV-2, and at 2 days after infection, 4 RMs began daily baricitinib administration (4 mg). Longitudinal collections performed are indicated in circles. (B and C) Concentration of baricitinib 24 h after dosing in plasma (6 days after infection closed symbol; 8 days after infection open symbol) (B) and at necropsy in upper and lower lungs of baricitinib-treated SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs (C). (D and E) Daily cage-side assessment and physical examination scores (D) and changes in body weight from baseline (E) in baricitinib-treated (blue symbols; n = 4) and untreated (red symbols; n = 4) SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs. (F) Longitudinal pulse oximetry readings. (G–J) After SARS-CoV-2 inoculation, nasal, throat, bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs), and rectal swabs were collected, and viral loads were quantified by qRT-PCR. (K) Viral loads in tissues measured at necropsy (10–11 days after infection). Abbreviation is as follows: Ct, cycle threshold. Different symbols represent individual RMs. Thick lines represent the average of the baricitinib-treated (blue lines) and untreated (red lines) groups. Bars in (B), (C), and (K) represent the average of the treated and untreated groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. See also Figures S1 and S2A and Tables S1, S2, and S3.

**Figure S1**
Baricitinib was well-tolerated and detectable in the central nervous system in SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs, related to Figure 1 (A) Left, concentration of baricitinib 2 hours after dosing in brain and CSF and, right, 24 hours after dosing in CSF. (B–D) Longitudinal frequency of (B) monocytes, (C) neutrophils, and (D) lymphocytes in blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected RMs. (E–H) In (E), red blood cell counts (RBC), (F) hematocrit (HCT), (G) hemoglobin (HGB) and (H) alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were analyzed throughout the study. (I) Longitudinal rectal temperatures. Different symbols represent individual animals. Bold lines represent the average of the baricitinib treated group (blue), and the untreated group (red).

**Figure S2**
Baricitinib reduced lung neutrophil and macrophage infiltration, preserved IFN responses but did not reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication in RMs, related to Figures 1 and 2 (A–I) In (A), representative images of *in situ* RNA hybridization (RNAscope) targeting viral RNA strands identifying clusters of infected cells within the lung parenchyma in both treated and untreated SARS-CoV-2 infected RMs. Scale bars: 100 um. Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images of (B) neutrophils (myeloperoxidase+, MPO, cells) (D) macrophages (ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1+, Iba-1, cells), (F) proliferating (Ki-67), and (H) Interferon-induced GTP-binding protein+ (Mx1), cells in lungs of baricitinib treated and untreated SARS-CoV-2 infected RMs, and uninfected RMs. Scale bars 500 μm. Quantification of (C) neutrophils (MPO+ positive cells/mm²), (E) macrophages (lba-1+ cells/mm²), (G) proliferating (Ki-67⁺), and (I) Interferon-induced protein Mx1 (% area total lung Mx1+) in IHC lung images of baricitinib treated, and untreated controls of SARS-CoV-2 infected RMs, and uninfected RMs.

**Figure 2**
Reduced respiratory disease and lower levels of lung pathology in baricitinib-treated RMs (A) Representative ventrodorsal radiograph of an untreated RM before SARS-CoV-2 infection (5 days before infection), and at 4, and 7 days after infection. Red squares indicate regions of pulmonary infiltrates and opacity. (B and C) Daily (B) and cumulative (C) radiograph scores; ventrodorsal and lateral radiographs were scored for the presence of pulmonary infiltration by a clinical radiologist according to a standard scoring system (0: normal; 1: mild interstitial pulmonary infiltrates; 2: moderate pulmonary infiltrates with partial cardiac border effacement and small areas of pulmonary consolidation; 3: severe interstitial infiltrates, large areas of pulmonary consolidation, alveolar patterns, and air bronchograms). (D and E) Fold change to 2 days after infection for ferritin (D) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (E). (F and G) Panel (F) shows 100× magnification, and (G) shows 200× magnification (zoomed in from F), representative lung lesions in an untreated SARS-Cov-2-infected RM with focally extensive interstitial pneumonia, type 2 pneumocytes hyperplasia, alveolar septal thickening, syncytia formation (arrow), neutrophils, and macrophages infiltrations (arrowhead). (H) 200× magnification, Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 (TTF-1) staining with prominent type 2 pneumocyte hyperplasia (brown) in a control SARS-CoV-2-infected RM. (I and J) Panel (I) shows 100× magnification, and (J) shows 200× magnification (zoomed in from I), treatment effects of baricitinib in SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs with a reduction in pulmonary lesions, lesser inflammatory infiltrates (arrowhead), and reduced type 2 pneumocyte hyperplasia. (K) 200× magnification, TTF-1 staining with lesser type 2 pneumocyte hyperplasia (brown) after baricitinib treatment. (L) Average pathology score per lobe. (M) Total pathology score. (N) Pathology scores for individual parameters. Scale bar, (F) and (I): 100 μM; (G), (H), (J), and (K): 50 μM. Bars in (D), (E), (L), (M), and (N) indicate mean values for baricitinib-treated (blue) and untreated (red) SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs. Each symbol represents individual animals. Statistical analysis in (D), (E), and (L)–(N) were performed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Statistical analyses were performed two-sided with p ≤ 0.05 deemed significant. Ranges of significance were graphically annotated as follows: ^∗p < 0.05. See also Figures S2B–S2I.

**Figure 3**
Baricitinib treatment suppresses gene expression of inflammation and neutrophil degranulation in the BALs of SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs Bulk RNA-seq profiles of BAL cell suspensions from RMs obtained at day −5 prior to SARS-CoV-2 inoculation (baseline), at 2 days after infection, prior to baricitinib treatment, and at 4 days after infection, 2 days after initiation of baricitinib. (A) Venn diagrams indicating the number of differential expression genes (DEGs) detected at 2 or 4 days after infection relative to −5 days after infection in the untreated (red) and baricitinib-treated (blue) groups. The total DEGs for each comparison are shown in parentheses. (B) Bar plots showing enrichment of top scoring inflammatory and immunological gene signatures from the MSIGDB (Hallmark and Canonical Pathways) and databases, and custom gene sets (interferon-stimulated genes [ISGs]; see below) ranked by GSEA comparisons of gene expression in the 4 days after infection versus 2 days after infection samples from the untreated (red bars) and baricitinib-treated (blue bars) groups. The x axis depicts the normalized enrichment score (NES); a positive enrichment score indicated higher expression at 4 days after infection relative to 2 days after infection (bars facing right); conversely, negative scores of a pathway indicate cumulatively higher expression in 2 days after infection samples relative to 4 days after infection (bars facing left). Nominal p values are indicated. (C–F) GSEA enrichment plots depicting pairwise comparison of gene expression of 2 days after infection versus 4 days after infection samples for the untreated group and for the baricitinib-treated group. The top-scoring (i.e., leading edge) genes are indicated by solid dots. The hash plot under GSEA curves indicates individual genes and their rank in the dataset. Left-leaning curves (i.e., positive enrichment scores) indicate higher expression of pathways at 4 days after infection; right-leaning curves (negative enrichment scores) indicate higher expression at 2 days after infection. Sigmoidal curves indicate equivalent expression between the groups being compared. The NES and nominal p values testing the significance of each comparison are indicated. (C) REACTOME_ NEUTROPHIL_DEGRANULATION (MSIDB #M27620). (D) GSEA line plot of HALLMARK_TNFA_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB pathway (MSIGDB #M5890). (E) GSEA line plot of HALLMARK_IL6_JAK_STAT3_SIGNALING (MSIGDB #M5897). (F) A custom gene set of ISGs from prior NHP studies (Nganou-Makamdop et al., 2018; Palesch et al., 2018; Sandler et al., 2014). (G–J) Heatmaps of top-scoring (i.e., leading edge) from the untreated 4 days after infection versus 2 days after infection GSEA analyses. The color scale indicates the log2 expression relative to the median of all baseline samples. See also Figure S3.

**Figure S3**
Baricitinib Suppressed the expression of inflammatory mediators and neutrophil degranulation genes in BALs from SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs, related to Figure 3 Cross-sectional GSEA analysis comparing 4 days after infection untreated versus 4 days after infection baricitinib treated, or 2 days after infection untreated versus 2 days after infection baricitinib treated in bulk BAL from SARS-CoV-2 infected RMs. (A–C) GSEA comparisons of 4 days after infection untreated versus 4 days after infection baricitinib treated are shown as black symbols, and comparisons of or 2 days after infection untreated versus 2 days after infection baricitinib treated are shown as gray symbols. (A) GSEA enrichment plots for the GSEA line plot of HALLMARK_IL6_JAK_STAT3_SIGNALING pathway (MSIGDB #M5897). (B) GSEA line plot of HALLMARK_TNFA_SIGNALING_VIA_NFKB pathway (MSIGDB #M5890). (C) GSEA line plot of REACTOME NEUTROPHIL DEGRANULATION gene set (REACTOME #M27620). (D) Heatmap of leading edge genes for REACTOME NEUTROPHIL DEGRANULATION gene set based on untreated 4 days after infection versus baseline contrast. The log2 expression and the reference is the median of all baseline samples as indicated at right. The top 35 genes are shown in order of GSEA analysis of the cross-sectional 4 days after infection comparison. (E and F) GSEA analysis for KEGG Rheumatoid Arthritis gene set (E) GSEA contrasting 4 days after infection versus 2 days after infection for untreated and treated arms. GSEA curves are colored by experimental arm. Leading edge genes are indicated by solid dots. The hash plot under GSEA curves indicate individual genes and their rank in the dataset. Left-leaning curves (i.e., positive enrichment scores) indicate enrichment at 4 days after infection, right-leaning curves (negative enrichment scores) indicate higher enrichment at 2 days after infection, and sigmoidal curves indicate a lack of enrichment, i.e., equivalent expression between the groups being compared. The normalized enrichment scores and nominal p values testing the significance of each comparison are indicated. (F) GSEA comparisons of 4 days after infection untreated versus 4 days after infection baricitinib treated samples (black symbols); comparisons of 2 days after infection untreated versus 2 days after infection baricitinib treated samples (gray symbols). (G) plot showing log10 average normalized counts obtained from DESeq2 for leading edge genes at 2 days after infection in untreated and treated samples, and (H) at 4 days after infection.

**Figure 4**
Baricitinib treatment abolishes inflammatory cytokine and neutrophil chemoattractant expression in bronchoalveolar macrophages Single-cell suspensions from BALs of SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs were subject to 10× Genomics capture and sequencing. (A) UMAP showing major cell types in BAL samples (n = 10 samples; untreated, baseline n = 3; untreated, 4 days after infection n = 3; treated, baseline n = 2; treated, 4 days after infection n=2). (B) UMAP showing clusters in BAL samples by treatment days (n = 10). (C) UMAP projection of pro-inflammatory cytokines in macrophages. (D) UMAP projection of neutrophil chemoattractant and pro-inflammatory chemokines. (E and F) Expression of chemokines and interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in treated and untreated samples at baseline and 4 days after infection. The colored expression scale of expression in UMAPs is depicted on a per gene basis: the scale represents the per cell reads for each gene divided by the total reads for of that cell, scaled to the factor shown and natural log-transformed. See also Figures S4 and S5.

**Figure S4**
Baricitinib inhibited the expression of inflammatory and macrophage/neutrophil chemokine genes while preserving ISGs in lung macrophages from SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs, related to Figure 4 (A) Expression as UMAP projection of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) in macrophages for treated and untreated samples at baseline and 4 days after infection. (B) Heatmap showing average expression of genes of interest in macrophages for treated and untreated samples at baseline and 4 days after infection. (C–E) Dot plots representing gene expression levels and percentage of cells expressing genes associated with inflammation, chemokine response and interferon stimulation

**Figure S5**
Baricitinib reduced the expression of inflammatory and chemokine gGenes while maintaining ISGs in BALs from SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs, related to Figure 4 (A–C) Expression as UMAP projection of inflammation, chemokine and interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) across major cell types in BAL for treated and untreated samples at baseline and 4 days after infection.

**Figure 5**
Baricitinib-treated RMs have decreased infiltration of innate immune cells and lowered neutrophil NETosis (A) UMAP analysis of BALs in baricitinib-treated (n = 4) and untreated (n = 4) SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs before infection (D −5 PI; baseline), and at 4 and 10 days after infection. (B) Longitudinal levels of neutrophils within BAL samples depicted as a percentage of CD45⁺ cells (C) Fold change to 2 days after infection of neutrophils in blood of baricitinib-treated and untreated SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs. (D) Longitudinal levels of CD14⁺CD16^– monocytes within BAL samples depicted as a percentage of CD45⁺ cells. (E) Representative microscopy images of NETS by Sytox green assay in baricitinib-treated and untreated SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs. Scale bar, 200 μm. (F) Quantification of NETosis activity upon staining extracellular DNA with Sytox in isolated stimulated neutrophils from blood. Fold change of Sytox levels to −5 days after infection. (G) Quantification of citrullinated H3 in plasma. (H) Staining of citrullinated H3 in lungs at 10–11 days after infection. In (B)–(D), (F), and (G), each symbol represents individual animals. Thick lines represent the average of the baricitinib-treated (blue line) and untreated groups (red line). Bars in (C) and (F) represent the average of the treated and untreated groups. Statistical analysis in (B), (C), (F), and (G) was performed using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Statistical analyses were performed two-sided with p ≤ 0.05 deemed significant. Ranges of significance were graphically annotated as follows: ^∗p < 0.05. See also Figures S6A and S6B.

**Figure S6**
Flow cytometry gating strategy for innate and adaptive cells, related to Figures 5 and 6 Representative gating strategy of (A) neutrophils, (B) neutrophil infiltration in BAL at baseline, and 4 and 10 days after infection, and (C) T cell populations analyzed in the study.

**Figure 6**
Decreased levels of T cell proliferation and activation in baricitinib-treated RMs (A and B) Longitudinal levels of (A) circulating CD4⁺ T cells and (B) CD4⁺ T_Reg (CD45⁺CD3⁺CD4⁺ CD95⁺ CD127^– CD25⁺ FoxP3⁺; representative staining in Figure S6C) cells measured by flow cytometry of baricitinib-treated (blue) and untreated (red) SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs. (C) Fold changes to 2 days after infection of circulating CD4⁺ T_Reg cells. (D and E) Levels of circulating CD8⁺ T cells (D) and proliferating (Ki-67⁺) memory CD8⁺ T cells (E). (F and G) Levels of CD4⁺ T cells (F) and HLA-DR^–CD38⁺ memory CD4⁺ T cells (G) in bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) measured by flow cytometry. (H–J) Levels of CD8⁺ T cells (H), proliferating (Ki-67⁺) memory CD8⁺ T cells (I), and HLA-DR^–CD38⁺ memory CD8⁺ T cells (J) in BALs. Each symbol represents individual animals. Thick lines represent the average of the baricitinib-treated (blue line) and untreated groups (red line). (K–M) Representative staining of Ki-67 and CD38 by HLA-DR. Bars in (C) represent the average of the treated and untreated groups. Statistical analysis in (C), (E), and (G) was performed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney test. Statistical analyses were performed two-sided with p ≤ 0.05 deemed significant. Ranges of significance were graphically annotated as follows: ^∗p < 0.05. See also Figures S6C and S7.

**Figure S7**
Baricitinib treatment did not affect the immune T cell responses in SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs, related to Figure 6 (A–C) Frequency of circulating CD4+ T cells spontaneously (without stimulation) producing pro-inflammatory Th17 related cytokines (A) IL-17⁺, (B) IL-17⁺IL-21⁺, (C) IL-17⁺IL- 22⁺ at necropsy (days 10–11 after infection) in baricitinib (blue) and untreated (red) SARS-CoV-2 infected RMs. (D) Representative flow cytometry staining of IFNγ, TNFα, IL-2, IL-4 and IL-17a in CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells of a SARS-CoV-2 infected RM following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 S peptide pool. IFNγ, Unstimulated background values were subtracted from S peptide stimulated values to determine T cell cytokine. (E and F) IFNγ, TNFα, IL-2, IL-4 and IL-17a frequency levels in (E) CD4⁺ and (F) CD8⁺T cells following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 S peptide pool. (G–L) IFNγ, TNFα, IL-2, IL-4 and IL-17a frequency levels in (G) CD4⁺ and (H) CD8⁺T cells following stimulation with PMA/Ionomycin. Values from unstimulated controls were subtracted in all cases. Granzyme B and PD-1 levels in (I and J) blood and (K and L) BAL memory CD8⁺T cells measured by flow cytometry. Each symbol represents individual animals. Thick lines represent the average of the baricitinib treated (blue line), and untreated groups (red line). Bars represent the average of the treated and untreated groups. Statistical analysis was performed using a non-parametric Mann-Whitney Test.

**Figure 7**
Effect of baricitinib treatment on the lower airway of SARS-CoV-2-infected RMs (A) SARS-Cov-2 infection in RMs results in an accumulation of inflammatory macrophages and neutrophils in the lower airway. These airway macrophages produce high amounts of inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil-attracting chemokines and show upregulated type I interferon signaling. Neutrophil NETs and the inflammation induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection both contribute to lung pathology. (B) Baricitinib treatment reduced the levels of macrophages producing inflammatory cytokines and neutrophil-attracting chemokines, decreased the infiltration of neutrophils into the lung, and reduced T cell activation. The Netosis activity of neutrophils was also reduced. In treated animals, the antiviral interferon response was maintained, viral replication was not impacted, and lung pathology was mild.

See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Baricitinib treatment resolves lower airway inflammation and neutrophil recruitment in SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques.
Hoang TN, Pino M, Boddapati AK, Viox EG, Starke CE, Upadhyay AA, Gumber S, Busman-Sahay K, Strongin Z, Harper JL, Tharp GK, Pellegrini KL, Kirejczyk S, Zandi K, Tao S, Horton TR, Beagle EN, Mahar EA, Lee MY, Cohen J, Jean SM, Wood JS, Connor-Stroud F, Stammen RL, Delmas OM, Wang S, Cooney KA, Sayegh MN, Wang L, Weiskopf D, Filev PD, Waggoner J, Piantadosi A, Kasturi SP, Al-Shakhshir H, Ribeiro SP, Sekaly RP, Levit RD, Estes JD, Vanderford TH, Schinazi RF, Bosinger SE, Paiardini M. Hoang TN, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Sep 16:2020.09.16.300277. doi: 10.1101/2020.09.16.300277. bioRxiv. 2020. Update in: Cell. 2021 Jan 21;184(2):460-475.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.007. PMID: 32995780 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.

Cited by

Care of the Seriously Ill Patient with SARS-CoV-2.
Leither LM, Buckel W, Brown SM. Leither LM, et al. Med Clin North Am. 2022 Nov;106(6):949-960. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 10. Med Clin North Am. 2022. PMID: 36280338 Free PMC article. Review.
COVID-19 and the potential of Janus family kinase (JAK) pathway inhibition: A novel treatment strategy.
Khaledi M, Sameni F, Yahyazade S, Radandish M, Owlia P, Bagheri N, Afkhami H, Mahjoor M, Esmaelpour Z, Kohansal M, Aghaei F. Khaledi M, et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 30;9:961027. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.961027. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36111104 Free PMC article. Review.
COVID-19 as a mediator of interferon deficiency and hyperinflammation: Rationale for the use of JAK1/2 inhibitors in combination with interferon.
Hasselbalch HC, Skov V, Kjær L, Ellervik C, Poulsen A, Poulsen TD, Nielsen CH. Hasselbalch HC, et al. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021 Aug;60:28-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021. PMID: 33992887 Free PMC article. Review.
Monitoring and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of laboratory rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Oh DQP, Grothe I, Lukaß H, Kreiter AK, Hoffmann M, Wegener D. Oh DQP, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3274. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30473-7. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36841887 Free PMC article.
Efficacy and safety of baricitinib plus standard of care for the treatment of critically ill hospitalised adults with COVID-19 on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an exploratory, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Ely EW, Ramanan AV, Kartman CE, de Bono S, Liao R, Piruzeli MLB, Goldman JD, Saraiva JFK, Chakladar S, Marconi VC; COV-BARRIER Study Group. Ely EW, et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Apr;10(4):327-336. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00006-6. Epub 2022 Feb 3. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. PMID: 35123660 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Aran D., Looney A.P., Liu L., Wu E., Fong V., Hsu A., Chak S., Naikawadi R.P., Wolters P.J., Abate A.R. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:163–172. - PMC - PubMed
1. Arunachalam P.S., Wimmers F., Mok C.K.P., Perera R.A.P.M., Scott M., Hagan T., Sigal N., Feng Y., Bristow L., Tak-Yin Tsang O. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans. Science. 2020;369:1210–1220. - PMC - PubMed
1. Bost P., Giladi A., Liu Y., Bendjelal Y., Xu G., David E., Blecher-Gonen R., Cohen M., Medaglia C., Li H. Host-Viral Infection Maps Reveal Signatures of Severe COVID-19 Patients. Cell. 2020;181:1475–1488. - PMC - PubMed
1. Bronte V., Ugel S., Tinazzi E., Vella A., De Sanctis F., Cane S., Batani V., Trovato R., Fiore A., Petrova V. Baricitinib restrains the immune dysregulation in severe COVID-19 patients. J. Clin. Invest. 2020 - PMC - PubMed
1. Cantini F., Niccoli L., Matarrese D., Nicastri E., Stobbione P., Goletti D. Baricitinib therapy in COVID-19: A pilot study on safety and clinical impact. J. Infect. 2020;81:318–356. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Substances

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- H1 Connect
- scite Smart Citations
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information
Molecular Biology Databases
- NIAID Data Ecosystem - Find datasets on Infectious and Immune-mediated Diseases
Research Materials
- NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

[1] Aran D., Looney A.P., Liu L., Wu E., Fong V., Hsu A., Chak S., Naikawadi R.P., Wolters P.J., Abate A.R. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:163–172. - PMC - PubMed

[2] Aran D., Looney A.P., Liu L., Wu E., Fong V., Hsu A., Chak S., Naikawadi R.P., Wolters P.J., Abate A.R. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:163–172. - PMC - PubMed

[3] Arunachalam P.S., Wimmers F., Mok C.K.P., Perera R.A.P.M., Scott M., Hagan T., Sigal N., Feng Y., Bristow L., Tak-Yin Tsang O. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans. Science. 2020;369:1210–1220. - PMC - PubMed

[4] Arunachalam P.S., Wimmers F., Mok C.K.P., Perera R.A.P.M., Scott M., Hagan T., Sigal N., Feng Y., Bristow L., Tak-Yin Tsang O. Systems biological assessment of immunity to mild versus severe COVID-19 infection in humans. Science. 2020;369:1210–1220. - PMC - PubMed

[5] Bost P., Giladi A., Liu Y., Bendjelal Y., Xu G., David E., Blecher-Gonen R., Cohen M., Medaglia C., Li H. Host-Viral Infection Maps Reveal Signatures of Severe COVID-19 Patients. Cell. 2020;181:1475–1488. - PMC - PubMed

[6] Bost P., Giladi A., Liu Y., Bendjelal Y., Xu G., David E., Blecher-Gonen R., Cohen M., Medaglia C., Li H. Host-Viral Infection Maps Reveal Signatures of Severe COVID-19 Patients. Cell. 2020;181:1475–1488. - PMC - PubMed

[7] Bronte V., Ugel S., Tinazzi E., Vella A., De Sanctis F., Cane S., Batani V., Trovato R., Fiore A., Petrova V. Baricitinib restrains the immune dysregulation in severe COVID-19 patients. J. Clin. Invest. 2020 - PMC - PubMed

[8] Bronte V., Ugel S., Tinazzi E., Vella A., De Sanctis F., Cane S., Batani V., Trovato R., Fiore A., Petrova V. Baricitinib restrains the immune dysregulation in severe COVID-19 patients. J. Clin. Invest. 2020 - PMC - PubMed

[9] Cantini F., Niccoli L., Matarrese D., Nicastri E., Stobbione P., Goletti D. Baricitinib therapy in COVID-19: A pilot study on safety and clinical impact. J. Infect. 2020;81:318–356. - PMC - PubMed

[10] Cantini F., Niccoli L., Matarrese D., Nicastri E., Stobbione P., Goletti D. Baricitinib therapy in COVID-19: A pilot study on safety and clinical impact. J. Infect. 2020;81:318–356. - PMC - PubMed

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Baricitinib treatment resolves lower-airway macrophage inflammation and neutrophil recruitment in SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques

Affiliations

Baricitinib treatment resolves lower-airway macrophage inflammation and neutrophil recruitment in SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus macaques

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Figures

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Molecular Biology Databases

Research Materials

Miscellaneous

Abstract

Conflict of interest statement

Figures

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Molecular Biology Databases

Research Materials

Miscellaneous