Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 29:7:302.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00302. eCollection 2020.

Inter-Rater Reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale in Cats Undergoing Dental Extractions

Affiliations

Inter-Rater Reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale in Cats Undergoing Dental Extractions

Ryota Watanabe et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS) in cats undergoing dental extractions and the effects of the caregiver's presence on the FGS scores. Twenty-four cats (6 ± 3.3 years old; 4.9 ± 1.7 kg) undergoing oral treatment were included in a prospective, blinded, randomized, clinical study. They underwent treatment under general anesthesia (acepromazine-hydromorphone-propofol-isoflurane-meloxicam-local anesthetic blocks) at day 1 and were discharged at day 6. Images of cat faces were captured from video recordings with or without the caregiver's presence at 6 h postoperatively (day 1), day 6, and before and after rescue analgesia. Images were randomized and independently evaluated by four raters using the FGS [five action units (AU): ear position, orbital tightening, muzzle tension, whiskers change, and head position; score 0-2 for each]. Inter-rater reliability and the effects of the caregiver's presence were analyzed with intraclass correlation coefficient [single measures (95% confidence interval)] and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively (p < 0.05). A total of 91 images were scored. Total FGS scores showed good inter-rater reliability [0.84 (0.77-0.89)]. Reliability for each AU was: ears [0.68 (0.55-0.78)], orbital tightening [0.76 (0.65-0.84)], muzzle [0.56 (0.43-0.69)], whiskers [0.64 (0.50-0.76)], and head position [0.74 (0.63-0.82)]. The FGS scores were not different with [0.075 (0-0.325)] or without [0.088 (0-0.525)] the caregivers' presence (p = 0.12). The FGS is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cats undergoing dental extractions. The caregiver's presence did not affect FGS scores.

Keywords: Feline Grimace Scale; analgesia; dental pain; dentistry; facial expression; feline; pain assessment; periodontal disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of images captured from 24 cats with oral disease included in the study. Images with (a) and (b) were included for the analyses of inter-rater reliability and the effect of caregiver's presence, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bellows J, Berg ML, Dennis S, Harvey R, Lobprise HB, Snyder CJ, et al. . 2019 AAHA dental care guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. (2019) 55:49–69. 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-6933 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watanabe R, Doodnaught G, Proulx C, Auger JP, Monteiro B, Dumais Y, et al. . A multidisciplinary study of pain in cats undergoing dental extractions: a prospective, blinded, clinical trial. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:e0213195. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213195 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watanabe R, Frank D, Steagall P. Pain behaviors before and after treatment of oral disease in cats using video assessment: a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial. BMC Vet Res. (2020) 16:100. 10.1186/s12917-020-02302-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reid J, Scott EM, Calvo G, Nolan AM. Definitive Glasgow acute pain scale for cats: validation and intervention level. Vet Rec. (2017) 180:449. 10.1136/vr.104208 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brondani JT, Mama KR, Luna SP, Wright BD, Niyom S, Ambrosio J, et al. . Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats. BMC Vet Res. (2013) 9:143. 10.1186/1746-6148-9-143 - DOI - PMC - PubMed