Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):831-838.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0910.

Effect of Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibition vs Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibition vs Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Study

Eric X Chen et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition has not shown activities in advanced refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), other than in those patients who are microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H).

Objective: To evaluate whether combining programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition improved patient survival in metastatic refractory CRC.

Design, setting, and participants: A randomized phase 2 study was conducted in 27 cancer centers across Canada between August 2016 and June 2017, and data were analyzed on October 18, 2018. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; received all available standard systemic therapies (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab if appropriate; cetuximab or panitumumab if RAS wild-type tumors; regorafenib if available); were aged 18 years or older; had adequate organ function; had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and measurable disease.

Interventions: We randomly assigned patients to receive either 75 mg of tremelimumab every 28 days for the first 4 cycles plus 1500 mg durvalumab every 28 days, or best supportive care alone (BSC) in a 2:1 ratio.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and a 2-sided P<.10 was considered statistically significant. Circulating cell-free DNA from baseline plasma was used to determine microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB).

Results: Of 180 patients enrolled (121 men [67.2%] and 59 women [32.8%]; median [range] age, 65 [36-87] years), 179 were treated. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, the median OS was 6.6 months for durvalumab and tremelimumab and 4.1 months for BSC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 90% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = .07). Progression-free survival was 1.8 months and 1.9 months respectively (HR, 1.01; 90% CI, 0.76-1.34). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were significantly more frequent with immunotherapy (75 [64%] patients in the treatment group had at least 1 grade 3 or higher adverse event vs 12 [20%] in the BSC group). Circulating cell-free DNA analysis was successful in 168 of 169 patients with available samples. In patients who were microsatellite stable (MSS), OS was significantly improved with durvalumab and tremelimumab (HR, 0.66; 90% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = .02). Patients who were MSS with plasma TMB of 28 variants per megabase or more (21% of MSS patients) had the greatest OS benefit (HR, 0.34; 90% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = .004).

Conclusions and relevance: This phase 2 study suggests that combined immune checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab plus tremelimumab may be associated with prolonged OS in patients with advanced refractory CRC. Elevated plasma TMB may select patients most likely to benefit from durvalumab and tremelimumab. Further confirmation studies are warranted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02870920.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Chen participated in clinical trials sponsored by Merck, BMS, Boston Biomedical, AZ, and received research support (drugs only) from AZ. Dr Chen received honoraria from Eisai and Taiho. Dr Loree received research support from Ipsen and honoraria from Ipsen, Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, and Taiho. Dr Samson received honorarium from Taiho. Dr Goffin received honoraria from Merck and Amgen and nonfinancial support from AZ. Dr Samimi received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Ipsen, Apobiologix, Eisai, Taiho, and Roche. Dr Aubin received honoraria from Taiho, Shire, Amgen, BMS, and Celgene, and participated in clinical trials sponsored by Merck and BMS. Dr Aucoin received honoraria from AZ, Roche, BMS, Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Taiho, Celgene. Dr Wei received honoraria from Shire and Celgene, and nonfinancial support from Bayer. All other authors declared no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram for CCTG (Canadian Cancer Trials Group) CO.26 Study
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Overall Survival by Randomized Group
dMMR indicates DNA mismatch repair deficient; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; MSI-H, microsatellite-instability high; MSS, microsatellite stable; pMMR, DNA mismatch repair proficient. A, Overall survival; and B, overall survival by subgroups for patients treated with durvalumab and tremelimumab and best supportive care vs best supportive care alone.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(1):7-34. doi:10.3322/caac.21551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. . Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild-type advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317(23):2392-2401. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7105 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stintzing S, Modest DP, Rossius L, et al. ; FIRE-3 investigators . FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1426-1434. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30269-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. ; CORRECT Study Group . Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303-312. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data