Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 5;153(6):715-718.
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa064.

Assessment of Specimen Pooling to Conserve SARS CoV-2 Testing Resources

Baha Abdalhamid  1   2 , Christopher R Bilder  3 , Emily L McCutchen  1   2 , Steven H Hinrichs  1 , Scott A Koepsell  1 , Peter C Iwen  1   2
Affiliations

Assessment of Specimen Pooling to Conserve SARS CoV-2 Testing Resources

Baha Abdalhamid et al. Am J Clin Pathol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To establish the optimal parameters for group testing of pooled specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Methods: The most efficient pool size was determined to be five specimens using a web-based application. From this analysis, 25 experimental pools were created using 50 µL from one SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal specimen mixed with 4 negative patient specimens (50 µL each) for a total volume of 250 µL. Viral RNA was subsequently extracted from each pool and tested using the CDC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay. Positive pools were consequently split into individual specimens and tested by extraction and PCR. This method was also tested on an unselected group of 60 nasopharyngeal specimens grouped into 12 pools.

Results: All 25 pools were positive with cycle threshold (Ct) values within 0 and 5.03 Ct of the original individual specimens. The analysis of 60 specimens determined that 2 pools were positive followed by identification of 2 individual specimens among the 60 tested. This testing was accomplished while using 22 extractions/PCR tests, a savings of 38 reactions.

Conclusions: When the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection is 10% or less, group testing will result in the saving of reagents and personnel time with an overall increase in testing capability of at least 69%.

Keywords: COVID-19; Group testing; SARS CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Optimal sample pool size. Graphical comparison of initial pool size compared to expected number of tests per individual using the Shiny application for pooled testing available at https://www.chrisbilder.com/shiny. The optimal sample pool size was determined based on the least number of tests and the following parameters: prevalence rate (5%), a lower limit of detection of 1 to 3 RNA copies/µL, an assay sensitivity of either 95% or 100%, and an assay specificity of 100%.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Del Rio C, Malani PN. COVID-19: new insights on a rapidly changing epidemic. JAMA. 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3072. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharfstein JM, Becker SJ, Mello MM. Diagnostic testing for the novel coronavirus. JAMA. 2020. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3864. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iwen PC, Stiles KL, Pentella MA. Safety considerations in the laboratory testing of specimens suspected or known to contain the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;153:567-570. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van TT, Miller J, Warshauer DM, et al. . Pooling nasopharyngeal/throat swab specimens to increase testing capacity for influenza viruses by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:891-896. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dwyre DM, Fernando LP, Holland PV. Hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV transfusion-transmitted infections in the 21st century. Vox Sang. 2011;100:92-98. - PubMed

MeSH terms