Diagnostic significance assessment of the circulating cell-free DNA in ovarian cancer: An updated meta-analysis
- PMID: 31330238
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.143993
Diagnostic significance assessment of the circulating cell-free DNA in ovarian cancer: An updated meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Recently, disagreements remain in increasing evidence about the potential value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a noninvasive diagnostic biomarker for ovarian cancer (OC). Here, this update meta-analysis was performed to further assess the diagnostic performance of circulating cfDNA in discriminating OC from non-cancerous individuals.
Methods: We performed a systemic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, OVID, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases to obtain 22 eligible articles including a total of 1125 patients and 1244 controls. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC) of the included studies for cfDNA in diagnosing OC patients were used to estimate the diagnostic value. The clinical utility of cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram. Heterogeneity was explored utilizing subgroup analysis and meta-regression.
Results: The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 73% and 90%, the DOR and AUROC were 25.29 and 0.90, respectively. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression, according to patients' region, study design, clinical stage, specimen types, detection indicators, simple size, publication year revealed there were no significant sources of heterogeneity. Additionally, subgroup analyses showed qualitative detection (methylation detection); TNM stage I-IV, publication year 2011-2018, serum-based cfDNA assays exhibited better diagnostic performance as compared to quantitative detection, TNM stage III-IV, publication year 2002-2010; plasma-based cfDNA assays, and more participants and prospective studies manifested superior diagnostic accuracy. The result of sensitivity analysis indicated no study exclusively contributed to the heterogeneity and Deeks' funnel plot suggested no evidence of significant publication bias.
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis found the qualitative detection (methylation); TNM stage I-IV, publication year 2011-2018 were related to more effective diagnostic accuracy for OC. However, serum-based cell-free DNA detection should be cautiously interpreted due to unclear factors. Hence, further large-scale longitudinal studies are required to validate the diagnostic potential of cell-free DNA. The present study provides to accrue knowledge of cell-free DNA levels for future researches.
Keywords: Circulating cell-free DNA; Diagnostic value; Meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Circulating Cell Free DNA as the Diagnostic Marker for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0155495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155495. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27253331 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Circulating HPV cDNA in the blood as a reliable biomarker for cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2020 Feb 6;15(2):e0224001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224001. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32027658 Free PMC article.
-
Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2018 May 11;9(36):24514-24524. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25314. eCollection 2018 May 11. Oncotarget. 2018. PMID: 29849957 Free PMC article.
-
Value of circulating cell-free DNA analysis as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 18;8(16):26625-26636. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15775. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28460452 Free PMC article.
-
The potential diagnostic accuracy of circulating microRNAs for prostate cancer: A meta-analysis.Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Apr;46(3):138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.05.005. Epub 2022 Mar 5. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022. PMID: 35260368 Review. English, Spanish.
Cited by
-
ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jul;31(7):961-982. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002565. Epub 2021 Jun 10. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34112736 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In Silico screening of circulating tumor DNA, circulating microRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs as diagnostic molecular biomarkers in ovarian cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 26;16(4):e0250717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250717. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33901236 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 10;23(19):12041. doi: 10.3390/ijms231912041. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36233339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Potential clinical utility of liquid biopsies in ovarian cancer.Mol Cancer. 2022 May 11;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01588-8. Mol Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35545786 Free PMC article. Review.
-
TP53 somatic evolution in cervical liquid-based cytology and blood from individuals with and without ovarian cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations.Oncogene. 2024 Jul;43(31):2421-2430. doi: 10.1038/s41388-024-03089-y. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Oncogene. 2024. PMID: 38918516 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical