Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;52(5):e12658.
doi: 10.1111/cpr.12658. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co-cultured MSCs-derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells

Affiliations

Enhanced bone tissue regeneration of a biomimetic cellular scaffold with co-cultured MSCs-derived osteogenic and angiogenic cells

Limei Li et al. Cell Prolif. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: The bone tissue engineering primarily focuses on three-dimensional co-culture systems, which physical and biological properties resemble the cell matrix of actual tissues. The complex dialogue between bone-forming and endothelial cells (ECs) in a tissue-engineered construct will directly regulate angiogenesis and bone regeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether co-culture between osteogenic and angiogenic cells derived by bone mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) could affect cell activities and new bone formation.

Materials and methods: Mesenchymal stem cells were dually induced to differentiate into osteogenic cells (OMSCs) and ECs; both cell types were co-cultured at different ratios to investigate their effects and underlying mechanisms through ELISA, RT-qPCR and MTT assays. The selected cell mixture was transplanted onto a nano-hydroxyapatite/polyurethane (n-HA/PU) scaffold to form a cell-scaffold construct that was implanted in the rat femoral condyles. Histology and micro-CT were examined for further verification.

Results: ELISA and gene expression studies revealed that co-cultured OMSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) significantly elevated the transcription levels of osteogenic genes such as ALP, Col-I and OCN, as well as transcription factors Msx2, Runx2 and Osterix; it also upregulated angiogenic factors of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and CD31 when compared with cells cultured alone or in other ratios. The optimized OMSCs/ECs group had more abundant calcium phosphate crystal deposition, further facilitated their bone formation in vivo.

Conclusions: The OMSCs/ECs-scaffold constructs at an optimal cell ratio (0.5/1.5) achieved enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic factor expression and biomineralization, which resulted in more effective bone formation.

Keywords: angiogenic cells; biomimetic scaffold; bone tissue engineering; co-culture; osteogenesis; stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the in vitro and in vivo experimental procedure. A, MSCs isolation and dual induced differentiation. B, Co‐culture model systems used for the analysis of cell‐to‐cell interactions and their mixtures at optimal ratios co‐cultured with the n‐HA/PU scaffold. C, In vivo experimental procedure
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of ECs in the mixed co‐culture with fixed numbers of total ECs and OMSCs. A, ELISA for ALP, OCN and VEGF markers after 3 d. B, RT‐qPCR for osteogenic (ALP, OCN, Col‐I, Msx2, Runx2 and Osterix) and angiogenic (CD31 and VEGF) markers after 14 d. The number of total cells was fixed at 2.0 × 105 and “2.0:0” indicates that 2.0 × 105 OMSCs were co‐cultured with 0 ECs. C, Effects of ECs in a mixed co‐culture with OMSCs on cell proliferation in the OM on days 4, 7 and 14. The total cells proliferated with increased ECs numbers. The bar represents the mean ± SD. N = 3; *significantly greater than OMSCs mono‐culture; #significantly lower than OMSCs monoculture
Figure 3
Figure 3
A, SEM micrographs and (B) fluorescent images (Live/Dead staining) of cells on the surface of the n‐HA/PU scaffold for 7 d: (a) MSCs group, (b) OMSCs group, (c) ECs group, (d) MSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) group and (e) OMSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) group. Effects of ECs in mixed co‐culture with OMSCs on cell proliferation and mineralization in OM medium. The flower‐like apatites are made up of flake apatite and inserted into the cell layers. One cell type mono‐culture and MSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) as the control, MSCs, ECs and MSCs/ECs cultured in α‐MEM, OMSCs cultured in OM medium
Figure 4
Figure 4
A, Micro‐CT images of the regenerated bone tissue and (B) relevant bone parameters of BV/TV (bone tissue volume/total volume), Tb.Th (trabecular thickness) and Tb.Sp (trabecular separation). C, Histological evaluation (HE staining) of new bone formation within the pore at 4 wk: (a) pure scaffold, (b) MSCs scaffold, (c) OMSCs scaffold, (d) ECs scaffold, (e) MSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) scaffold and (f) OMSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) scaffold. HB—host bone; S—scaffold; black arrows—new bone. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
Figure 5
Figure 5
A, Micro‐CT images of the regenerated bone tissue and (B) relevant bone parameters of BV/TV (bone tissue volume/total volume), Tb.Th (trabecular thickness) and Tb.Sp (trabecular separation). C, Histological evaluation (HE staining) of new bone formation within the pore at 8 wk: (a) pure scaffold, (b) MSCs scaffold, (c) OMSCs scaffold, (d) ECs scaffold, (e) MSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) scaffold and (f) OMSCs/ECs (0.5/1.5) scaffold. HB—host bone; S—scaffold; black arrows—new bone; red arrows—capillary vessels. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gerstenfeld LC, Cullinane DM, Barnes GL, Graves DT, Einhorn TA. Fracture healing as a post‐natal developmental process: molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88:873‐884. - PubMed
    1. Wei XW, Zhao DW, Wang BJ, et al. Tantalum coating of porous carbon scaffold supplemented with autologous bone marrow stromal stem cells for bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo. Exp Biol Med. 2016;1‐11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lü LX, Deegan A, Musa F, Xu T, Yang Y. The effects of biomimetically conjugated VEGF on osteogenesis and angiogenesis of MSCs (human and rat) and HUVECs co‐culture models. Colloid Surface B. 2018;167:550‐559. - PubMed
    1. Yang CC, Han B, Cao CL, Yang D, Qu XZ, Wang XY. An injectable double‐network hydrogel for the co‐culture of vascular endothelial cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for simultaneously enhancing vascularization and osteogenesis. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:7811. - PubMed
    1. Grellier M, Bordenave L, Amedee J. Cell‐to‐cell communication between osteogenic and endothelial lineages: implications for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:562‐571. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources