Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
- PMID: 30689971
- DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.042
Accuracy of FibroScan Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement in Assessing Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Abstract
Background & aims: We estimated the accuracy of FibroScan vibration-controlled transient elastography controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSMs) in assessing steatosis and fibrosis in patients with suspected nonalcoholic liver disease (NAFLD).
Methods: We collected data from 450 consecutive adults who underwent liver biopsy analysis for suspected NAFLD at 7 centers in the United Kingdom from March 2014 through January 2017. FibroScan examinations with M or XL probe were completed within the 2 weeks of the biopsy analysis (404 had a valid examination). The biopsies were scored by 2 blinded expert pathologists according to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network criteria. Diagnostic accuracy was estimated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for the categories of steatosis and fibrosis. We assessed effects of disease prevalence on positive and negative predictive values. For LSM, the effects of histological parameters and probe type were appraised using multivariable analysis.
Results: Using biopsy analysis as the reference standard, we found that CAP identified patients with steatosis with an AUROC of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.92) for S≥S1, 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.82) for S≥S2, and 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.75) for S=S3. Youden cutoff values for S≥S1, S≥S2, and S≥S3 were 302 dB/m, 331 dB/m, and 337 dB/m, respectively. LSM identified patients with fibrosis with AUROCs of 0.77 (95% CI 0.72-0.82) for F≥F2, 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.84) for F≥F3, and 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.93) for F=F4. Youden cutoff values for F≥F2, F≥F3, and F=F4 were 8.2 kPa, 9.7 kPa, and 13.6 kPa, respectively. Applying the optimal cutoff values, determined from this cohort, to populations of lower fibrosis prevalence increased negative predictive values and reduced positive predictive values. Multivariable analysis found that the only parameter that significantly affected LSMs was fibrosis stage (P<10-16); we found no association with steatosis or probe type.
Conclusions: In a prospective analysis of patients with NAFLD, we found CAP and LSM by FibroScan to assess liver steatosis and fibrosis, respectively, with AUROC values ranging from 0.70 to 0.89. Probe type and steatosis did not affect LSM.
Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01985009.
Keywords: Biomarker; NASH; Noninvasive; VCTE.
Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Utility of transient elastography (fibroscan) and impact of bariatric surgery on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in morbidly obese patients.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Jan;14(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 11. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018. PMID: 29126863
-
Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement and controlled attenuation parameter using FibroScan® M/XL probes to diagnose liver fibrosis and steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicenter prospective study.J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr;55(4):428-440. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01635-0. Epub 2019 Oct 25. J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 31654131
-
Assessment of transient elastography in diagnosing MAFLD and the early effects of sleeve gastrectomy on MAFLD among the Chinese population.Int J Surg. 2024 Apr 1;110(4):2044-2054. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001078. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38215263 Free PMC article.
-
When the liver gets stiff, the tough get moving.J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;35(6):953-959. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14963. Epub 2020 Feb 11. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 31867782 Review.
-
Performance of FibroScan in grading steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis.Arab J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov;24(4):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Nov 22. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37996351 Review.
Cited by
-
Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Quantification of Steatosis: Which Cut-Offs to Use?Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Mar 26;2021:6662760. doi: 10.1155/2021/6662760. eCollection 2021. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 33834008 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Usefulness of Different Imaging Modalities in Evaluation of Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Biomedicines. 2020 Aug 21;8(9):298. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8090298. Biomedicines. 2020. PMID: 32839409 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening patients in general practice for advanced chronic liver disease using an innovative IT solution: The Liver Toolkit.Hepatol Commun. 2024 Jun 27;8(7):e0482. doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000482. eCollection 2024 Jul 1. Hepatol Commun. 2024. PMID: 38934697 Free PMC article.
-
Exclusive liquor and cocktail consumption is associated with at-risk fibrosis among nonheavy alcohol users with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024 Jan;48(1):88-97. doi: 10.1111/acer.15220. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2024. PMID: 38206286 Free PMC article.
-
Association between phthalates exposure and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease under different diagnostic criteria: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2017 to 2018.Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;12:1407976. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1407976. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39386944 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous