Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;25(7):907.e1-907.e6.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.016. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

Sera from different age cohorts in Belgium show limited cross-neutralization between the mumps vaccine and outbreak strains

Affiliations
Free article

Sera from different age cohorts in Belgium show limited cross-neutralization between the mumps vaccine and outbreak strains

T Vermeire et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Mumps used to affect children between 2 and 15 years old. The mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) vaccine is available, with vaccine coverage rate of about 85% after two vaccine doses. Recently new mumps outbreaks have emerged in highly vaccinated populations; the causes for these new outbreaks are yet unknown. We tested if a difference in seroneutralizing capacity against the vaccine and wild-type viruses existed and if waning immunity could be detected.

Methods: In this study, 570 serum samples (age group 2-3 years (n = 96), 8-9 years (n = 95), 13-14 years (n = 94), 18-20 years (n = 96), 24-26 years (n = 92) and 50 + years (n = 97)) in Belgium were tested in the rapid fluorescent foci inhibition test for their neutralizing capacity against the vaccine and wild-type viruses.

Results: Neutralizing antibodies against the vaccine strain were present in 84% (81/97) of the 2-3-year, 74% (70/95) of the 8-9-year, 81% (76/94) of the 13-14-year, 76% (73/96) of the 18-20-year, 67% (62/92) of the 24-26-year and 77% (75/97) of the 50+-year age group serum samples. For all age groups, only about half of these serum samples were also positive for the wild-type virus. The geometric mean titres for the vaccine and wild-type virus for all younger age groups, except for 24-26 years, were significantly different, demonstrating poor in vitro cross-neutralization.

Conclusions: A possible contribution of antigenic differences between the genotype A and G mumps virus as well as other immune factors, in addition to lower-than-optimal vaccination coverage and waning immunity, could explain the poor in vitro cross-neutralization and should be further studied.

Keywords: Mumps virus; Neutralizing antibody; Outbreaks; Protection; RFFIT; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources