Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 11;9(5):e01560-18.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.01560-18.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Induces Reactivation of Human Cytomegalovirus Independently of Myeloid Cell Differentiation following Posttranscriptional Establishment of Latency

Affiliations

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Induces Reactivation of Human Cytomegalovirus Independently of Myeloid Cell Differentiation following Posttranscriptional Establishment of Latency

Eleonora Forte et al. mBio. .

Abstract

We used the Kasumi-3 model to study human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) latency and reactivation in myeloid progenitor cells. Kasumi-3 cells were infected with HCMV strain TB40/Ewt-GFP, flow sorted for green fluorescent protein-positive (GFP+) cells, and cultured for various times to monitor establishment of latency, as judged by repression of viral gene expression (RNA/DNA ratio) and loss of virus production. We found that, in the vast majority of cells, latency was established posttranscriptionally in the GFP+ infected cells: transcription was initially turned on and then turned off. We also found that some of the GFP- cells were infected, suggesting that latency might be established in these cells at the outset of infection. We were not able to test this hypothesis because some GFP- cells expressed lytic genes and thus it was not possible to separate them from GFP- quiescent cells. In addition, we found that the pattern of expression of lytic genes that have been associated with latency, including UL138, US28, and RNA2.7, was the same as that of other lytic genes, indicating that there was no preferential expression of these genes once latency was established. We confirmed previous studies showing that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) induced reactivation of infectious virus, and by analyzing expression of the progenitor cell marker CD34 as well as myeloid cell differentiation markers in IE+ cells after treatment with TNF-α, we showed that TNF-α induced transcriptional reactivation of IE gene expression independently of differentiation. TNF-α-mediated reactivation in Kasumi-3 cells was correlated with activation of NF-κB, KAP-1, and ATM.IMPORTANCE HCMV is an important human pathogen that establishes lifelong latent infection in myeloid progenitor cells and reactivates frequently to cause significant disease in immunocompromised people. Our observation that viral gene expression is first turned on and then turned off to establish latency suggests that there is a host defense, which may be myeloid cell specific, responsible for transcriptional silencing of viral gene expression. Our observation that TNF-α induces reactivation independently of differentiation provides insight into molecular mechanisms that control reactivation.

Keywords: cytomegalovirus; latency; reactivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
HCMV latency is established after activation of transcription at 14 days postinfection. (A) Schematic outlining the infection model used for studies of latency and reactivation in Kasumi-3 cells. GFP+ infected cells were purified by flow cytometry at 1 dpi. On day 14, latently infected cells were treated with TNF-α for 3 days to induce reactivation. (B) Representative FACS analysis of GFP expression in Kasumi-3 infected cells at 1 dpi compared to uninfected cells. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; SSC, side scatter. (C) Release of viral particles into the medium was measured by a TCID50 assay on MRC-5 cells after 2 weeks. (D) UL122 mRNA expression and DNA amount were analyzed at the indicated times postinfection and expressed relative to day 1 after normalization to GAPDH or RNase P. (E) RNA/DNA ratios of UL123, UL54, and UL32 over the course of infection. For panels C to E, statistical significance was calculated by a one-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test (n = 4). The error bars represent standard errors of the means, and the asterisks indicate P values (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001) calculated by the comparison to the peak (day 4 for RNA, day 8 for DNA and virus, and day 1 for the RNA/DNA ratio).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Analysis of GFP infected cells at 1 and 4 dpi. (A) Schematic outlining the sorting strategy to purify GFP cells at day 1 and day 4 postinfection. (B) Representative FACS analysis of GFP sorting at day 1 and day 4 postinfection. (C to E) DNA amount (C), mRNA expression (D), and RNA/DNA ratio (E) of UL122, UL54, UL32, US28, UL138, and RNA2.7 analyzed at the indicated times postinfection and expressed relative to day 1. RNA expression values were normalized to GAPDH, and the DNA amount was normalized to RNase P. The statistical significance was calculated by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (n = 3). The error bars represent the standard errors of the means, and the asterisks indicate P values (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001) calculated by comparison of the different genes at each time point.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Expression of latency-associated RNAs. mRNA expression (A), DNA amount (B), and RNA/DNA ratio (C) of UL32, RNA2.7, UL138, and US28 analyzed at the indicated times postinfection and expressed relative to day 1. RNA expression values were normalized to GAPDH, and the DNA amount was normalized to RNase P. The statistical significance was calculated by two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (n = 3). The error bars represent the standard errors of the means, and the asterisks indicate P values (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001) calculated by comparison of the different genes at each time point.
FIG 4
FIG 4
TNF-α induces reactivation independently of differentiation. (A) Latently infected cells (14 dpi) were treated or not with TNF-α for 3 days. On day 17, DNA and RNA from infected cells were analyzed for DNA copy number and expression of viral genes as decribed in Materials and Methods. The release of viral particles in the supernatant was measured by a TCID50 assay. The statistical significance was calculated by unpaired t test (n = 4). The error bars represent the standard errors of the means, and the asterisks indicate P values (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). (B) Representative FACS analysis of uninfected cells, latently infected cells, and TNF-α-treated cells for the expression of the hematopoietic progenitor marker CD34 and the viral immediate early proteins IE1/2. Reactivating cells were immunophenotyped by gating on the CD34+ and IE1/2+ population and analyzing expression of markers of myeloid differentiation (CD64, CD14, CD15, CD11c, and CD1c). (C) Percentage of undifferentiated cells within the IE1/2-expressing population in the TNF-α-treated cells (CD14, CD64, CD15, CD11c, and CD1c). The error bars represent the standard errors of the means calculated from 3 experiments.
FIG 5
FIG 5
TNF-α-mediated reactivation is correlated with activation of NF-κB and ATM signaling. Latently infected cells (14 dpi) were treated for 3 days with or without TNF-α at 5 ng/ml. (A to D) Flow cytometry analysis was performed to assess the activation of NF-κB (p65) and DDR (ATM, KAP-1, and γ-H2AX). The activation of p65, ATM, and KAP-1 was expressed as the ratio of phosphoprotein to total protein in comparison with untreated cells (p-p65-S536/p65, pATM-S1981/ATM, and p-Kap-S824/Kap1). γ-H2AX is expressed as the ratio of mean fluorescence intensity compared to untreated cells. The error bars represent the standard errors of the means calculated from 3 independent experiments (*, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eid AJ, Razonable RR. 2010. New developments in the management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation. Drugs 70:965–981. doi:10.2165/10898540-000000000-00000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gilbert GL, Hayes K, Hudson IL, James J. 1989. Prevention of transfusion-acquired cytomegalovirus infection in infants by blood filtration to remove leucocytes. Neonatal Cytomegalovirus Infection Study Group. Lancet i:1228–1231. - PubMed
    1. Hahn G, Jores R, Mocarski ES. 1998. Cytomegalovirus remains latent in a common precursor of dendritic and myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3937–3942. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.7.3937. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mendelson M, Monard S, Sissons P, Sinclair J. 1996. Detection of endogenous human cytomegalovirus in CD34+ bone marrow progenitors. J Gen Virol 77:3099–3102. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-77-12-3099. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sindre H, Tjøonnfjord GE, Rollag H, Ranneberg-Nilsen T, Veiby OP, Beck S, Degré M, Hestdal K. 1996. Human cytomegalovirus suppression of and latency in early hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood 88:4526–4533. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources