Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Aug 3;8(8):CD000567.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub7.

Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people

Sharon R Lewis et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Critically ill people may lose fluid because of serious conditions, infections (e.g. sepsis), trauma, or burns, and need additional fluids urgently to prevent dehydration or kidney failure. Colloid or crystalloid solutions may be used for this purpose. Crystalloids have small molecules, are cheap, easy to use, and provide immediate fluid resuscitation, but may increase oedema. Colloids have larger molecules, cost more, and may provide swifter volume expansion in the intravascular space, but may induce allergic reactions, blood clotting disorders, and kidney failure. This is an update of a Cochrane Review last published in 2013.

Objectives: To assess the effect of using colloids versus crystalloids in critically ill people requiring fluid volume replacement on mortality, need for blood transfusion or renal replacement therapy (RRT), and adverse events (specifically: allergic reactions, itching, rashes).

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and two other databases on 23 February 2018. We also searched clinical trials registers.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of critically ill people who required fluid volume replacement in hospital or emergency out-of-hospital settings. Participants had trauma, burns, or medical conditions such as sepsis. We excluded neonates, elective surgery and caesarean section. We compared a colloid (suspended in any crystalloid solution) versus a crystalloid (isotonic or hypertonic).

Data collection and analysis: Independently, two review authors assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and synthesised findings. We assessed the certainty of evidence with GRADE.

Main results: We included 69 studies (65 RCTs, 4 quasi-RCTs) with 30,020 participants. Twenty-eight studied starch solutions, 20 dextrans, seven gelatins, and 22 albumin or fresh frozen plasma (FFP); each type of colloid was compared to crystalloids.Participants had a range of conditions typical of critical illness. Ten studies were in out-of-hospital settings. We noted risk of selection bias in some studies, and, as most studies were not prospectively registered, risk of selective outcome reporting. Fourteen studies included participants in the crystalloid group who received or may have received colloids, which might have influenced results.We compared four types of colloid (i.e. starches; dextrans; gelatins; and albumin or FFP) versus crystalloids.Starches versus crystalloidsWe found moderate-certainty evidence that there is probably little or no difference between using starches or crystalloids in mortality at: end of follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.09; 11,177 participants; 24 studies); within 90 days (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14; 10,415 participants; 15 studies); or within 30 days (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.09; 10,135 participants; 11 studies).We found moderate-certainty evidence that starches probably slightly increase the need for blood transfusion (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.39; 1917 participants; 8 studies), and RRT (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.48; 8527 participants; 9 studies). Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether either fluid affected adverse events: we found little or no difference in allergic reactions (RR 2.59, 95% CI 0.27 to 24.91; 7757 participants; 3 studies), fewer incidences of itching with crystalloids (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.82; 6946 participants; 2 studies), and fewer incidences of rashes with crystalloids (RR 1.61, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.89; 7007 participants; 2 studies).Dextrans versus crystalloidsWe found moderate-certainty evidence that there is probably little or no difference between using dextrans or crystalloids in mortality at: end of follow-up (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.11; 4736 participants; 19 studies); or within 90 days or 30 days (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12; 3353 participants; 10 studies). We are uncertain whether dextrans or crystalloids reduce the need for blood transfusion, as we found little or no difference in blood transfusions (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; 1272 participants, 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence). We found little or no difference in allergic reactions (RR 6.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 144.93; 739 participants; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence). No studies measured RRT.Gelatins versus crystalloidsWe found low-certainty evidence that there may be little or no difference between gelatins or crystalloids in mortality: at end of follow-up (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.08; 1698 participants; 6 studies); within 90 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.09; 1388 participants; 1 study); or within 30 days (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.16; 1388 participants; 1 study). Evidence for blood transfusion was very low certainty (3 studies), with a low event rate or data not reported by intervention. Data for RRT were not reported separately for gelatins (1 study). We found little or no difference between groups in allergic reactions (very low-certainty evidence).Albumin or FFP versus crystalloidsWe found moderate-certainty evidence that there is probably little or no difference between using albumin or FFP or using crystalloids in mortality at: end of follow-up (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.06; 13,047 participants; 20 studies); within 90 days (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.04; 12,492 participants; 10 studies); or within 30 days (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06; 12,506 participants; 10 studies). We are uncertain whether either fluid type reduces need for blood transfusion (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.80; 290 participants; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence). Using albumin or FFP versus crystalloids may make little or no difference to the need for RRT (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.27; 3028 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), or in allergic reactions (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.17 to 3.33; 2097 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: Using starches, dextrans, albumin or FFP (moderate-certainty evidence), or gelatins (low-certainty evidence), versus crystalloids probably makes little or no difference to mortality. Starches probably slightly increase the need for blood transfusion and RRT (moderate-certainty evidence), and albumin or FFP may make little or no difference to the need for renal replacement therapy (low-certainty evidence). Evidence for blood transfusions for dextrans, and albumin or FFP, is uncertain. Similarly, evidence for adverse events is uncertain. Certainty of evidence may improve with inclusion of three ongoing studies and seven studies awaiting classification, in future updates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Sharon R Lewis: none known Michael W Pritchard: none known Andrew R Butler: none known Phil Alderson: none known Andrew F Smith: none known Ian Roberts: none known

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. We did not make judgements for studies that did not report outcomes of interest in the review, which are indicated by blank spaces
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study. We did not make judgements for studies that did not report outcomes of interest in the review, which are indicated by blank spaces
4
4
Funnel plot of comparison 1. Starches vs crystalloid, outcome: 1.1 mortality at end of follow‐up
5
5
Funnel plot of comparison 2. Dextrans vs crystalloid, outcome: 2.1 mortality at end of follow‐up
6
6
Funnel plot of comparison 4. Albumin and FFP vs crystalloid, outcome: 4.1 mortality at end of follow‐up

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Alpar 2004 {published data only}
    1. Alpar EK, Killampalli VV. Effects of hypertonic dextran in hypovolaemic shock: a prospective clinical trial. Injury 2004;35(5):500‐6. [PUBMED: 15081328] - PubMed
Annane 2013 {published data only}
    1. Annane D, Siami S, Jaber S, Martin C, Elatrous S, Declere AD, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA 2013;310(17):1809‐17. [PUBMED: 24108515] - PubMed
    1. Heming N, Elatrous S, Jaber S, Dumenil AS, Cousson J, Forceville X, et al. Haemodynamic response to crystalloids or colloids in shock: an exploratory subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017;7(10):e016736. [PUBMED: 28988172] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heming N, Elatrous S, Jaber S, Dumenil AS, Cousson J, Forceville X, et al. Hemodynamic effects of crystalloids vs colloids: a subgroup analysis of the CRISTAL trial. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 2014;2:115‐6. [PUBMED: 28988172] - PubMed
Baker 2009 {published data only}
    1. Baker AJ, Rhind SG, Morrison LJ, Black S, Crnko NT, Shek PN, et al. Resuscitation with hypertonic saline‐dextran reduces serum biomarker levels and correlates with outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients. Journal of Neurotrauma 2009;26(8):1227‐40. [PUBMED: 19637968] - PubMed
Bechir 2013 {published data only}
    1. Bechir M, Puhan MA, Fasshauer M, Schuepbach RA, Stocker R, Neff TA. Early fluid resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) in severe burn injury: a randomized, controlled, double‐blind clinical trial. Critical Care 2013;17(6):R299. [PUBMED: 24365167] - PMC - PubMed
Bentsen 2006 {published data only}
    1. Bentsen G, Breivik H, Lundar T, Stubhaug A. Hypertonic saline (7.2%) in 6% hydroxyethyl starch reduces intracranial pressure and improves hemodynamics in a placebo‐controlled study involving stable patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Critical Care Medicine 2006;34(12):2912‐7. [17075367] - PubMed
Brunkhorst 2008 {published data only}
    1. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, Meier‐Hellmann A, Ragaller M, Weiler N, et al. Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;358(2):125‐39. [PUBMED: 351096686] - PubMed
Bulger 2008 {published data only}
    1. Bulger EM, Cuschieri J, Warner K, Maier RV. Hypertonic resuscitation modulates the inflammatory response in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Annals of Surgery 2007;245(4):635‐41. [PUBMED: 17414614] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulger EM, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Copass MK, Hanson S, Cooper C, et al. Hypertonic resuscitation of hypovolemic shock after blunt trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Surgery 2008;143(2):139‐48. [18283138] - PubMed
Bulger 2010 {published data only}
    1. Bulger EM, May S, Brasel KJ, Schreiber M, Kerby JD, Tisherman SA, et al. Out‐of‐hospital hypertonic resuscitation following severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304(13):1455‐64. [PUBMED: 20924011] - PMC - PubMed
Bulger 2011 {published data only}
    1. Bulger EM, May S, Kerby JD, Emerson S, Stiell IG, Schreiber MA, et al. Out‐of‐hospital hypertonic resuscitation after traumatic hypovolemic shock: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Annals of Surgery 2011;253(3):431‐41. [PUBMED: 21178763] - PMC - PubMed
Caironi 2014 {published data only}
    1. Caironi P, Masson S, Tommaso M, Bottazzi B, Roberto L, Michela M, et al. Pentraxin 3 in patients with severe sepsis or shock: the ALBIOS trial. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 2017;47(1):73‐83. [PUBMED: 27864924] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caironi P, Tognoni G, Masson S, Fumagalli R, Pesenti A, Romero M, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;370(15):1412‐21. [PUBMED: 24635772] - PubMed
Chavez‐Negrete 1991 {published data only}
    1. Chavez‐Negrete A, Majluf Cruz S, Frati Munari A, Perches A, Arguero R. Treatment of hemorrhagic shock with intraosseous or intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline dextran solution. European Surgical Research 1991;23(2):123‐9. [PUBMED: 1718756] - PubMed
Cifra 2003 {published data only}
    1. Cifra HL, Velasco JN. A comparative study of the efficacy of 6% Haes‐Steril and Ringer's lactate in the management of dengue shock syndrome 555. Critical Care and Shock 2003;2:95‐100.
Cooper 2006 {published data only}
    1. Cooper AB, Cohn SM, Zhang HS, Hanna K, Stewart TE, Slutsky AS. Five percent albumin for adult burn shock resuscitation: lack of effect on daily multiple organ dysfunction score. Transfusion 2006;46(1):80‐9. [PUBMED: 16398734] - PubMed
Du 2011 {published data only}
    1. Du XJ, Hu WM, Xia Q, Huang ZW, Chen GY, Jin XD, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch resuscitation reduces the risk of intra‐abdominal hypertension in severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2011;40(8):1220‐5. [PUBMED: 21775917] - PubMed
Dubin 2010 {published data only}
    1. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Murias G, Palizas F Jr, Moseinco MC, et al. Comparison of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and saline solution for resuscitation of the microcirculation during the early goal‐directed therapy of septic patients. Journal of Critical Care 2010;25(4):659.e1‐8. [PUBMED: 20813485] - PubMed
Dung 1999 {published data only}
    1. Dung NM, Day NP, Tam DT, Loan HT, Chau HT, Minh LN, et al. Fluid replacement in dengue shock syndrome: a randomized, double‐blind comparison of four intravenous‐fluid regimens. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1999;29(4):787‐94. [PUBMED: 10589889] - PubMed
Ernest 1999 {published data only}
    1. Ernest D, Belzberg AS, Dodek PM. Distribution of normal saline and 5% albumin infusions in septic patients. Critical Care Medicine 1999;27(1):46‐50. [PUBMED: 9934892] - PubMed
Evans 1996 {published data only}
    1. Evans PA, Garnett M, Boffard K, Kirkman E, Jacobson BF. Evaluation of the effect of colloid (Haemaccel) on the bleeding time in the trauma patient. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1996;89(2):101P. [PUBMED: 8683491] - PMC - PubMed
Finfer 2004 {published data only}
    1. Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Presneill J, French C, Cole L, Story D, et al. Effects of saline or albumin resuscitation on standard coagulation tests. Critical Care and Resuscitation 2009;11(4):250‐6. [PUBMED: 20001872] - PubMed
    1. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. New England Journal of Medicine 2004;350(22):2247‐56. [15163774] - PubMed
    1. Finfer S, Bellomo R, McEvoy S, Lo SK, Myburgh J, Neal B, et al. Effect of baseline serum albumin concentration on outcome of resuscitation with albumin or saline in patients in intensive care units: analysis of data from the saline versus albumin fluid evaluation (SAFE) study. BMJ 2006;7577:1044. [PUBMED: 17040925] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finfer S, Myburgh J, Norton R, Cooper DJ, MacMahon S, Peto R, et al. Impact of albumin compared to saline on organ function and mortality of patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine 2011;37(1):86‐96. [PUBMED: 20924555] - PubMed
    1. Myburgh J, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Norton R, Bishop N, et al. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;357(9):874‐84. [PUBMED: 17761591] - PubMed
Goodwin 1983 {published data only}
    1. Goodwin CW, Dorethy J, Lam V, Pruitt BA Jr. Randomized trial of efficacy of crystalloid and colloid resuscitation on hemodynamic response and lung water following thermal injury. Annals of Surgery 1983;197(5):520‐31. [PUBMED: 6342554] - PMC - PubMed
Grba‐Bujevic 2012 {published data only}
    1. Grba‐Bujevic M, Bosan‐Kilibarda I, Strikic N. The use of hypertonic‐hyperoncotic solution for hypovolemic shock in trauma patients in prehospital setting. Neurologia Croatica 2012;61(Suppl 2):21‐4.
Guidet 2012 {published data only}
    1. Guidet B, Martinet O, Boulain T, Philippart F, Poussel JF, Maizel J, et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Critical Care 2012;16(3):R94. [PUBMED: 22624531] - PMC - PubMed
Hall 1978 {published data only}
    1. Hall K, Sorenson B. The treatment of burn shock: results of a 5‐year randomized, controlled clinical trial of dextran 70 v Ringer lactate solution. Burns 1978;5(1):107‐12.
    1. Hall KV, Sorensen B. The treatment of burn shock. A comparative controlled trial of treatment by colloid infusion (Dextran saline), and by exclusively electrolyte infusion (Ringer lactate). Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 173;7(1):67‐73. [PUBMED: 4752572] - PubMed
Heradstveit 2010 {published data only}
    1. Heradstveit BE, Guttormsen AB, Langorgen J, Hammersborg S‐M, Wentzel‐Larsen T, Fanebust R, et al. Capillary leakage in post‐cardiac arrest survivors during therapeutic hypothermia ‐ a prospective, randomised study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine 2010;18:29. [PUBMED: 20500876] - PMC - PubMed
James 2011 {published data only}
    1. James MF, Michell WL, Joubert IA, Nicol AJ, Navsaria PH, Gillespie RS. Resuscitation with hydroxyethyl starch improves renal function and lactate clearance in penetrating trauma in a randomized controlled study: the FIRST trial (Fluids in Resuscitation of Severe Trauma). British Journal of Anaesthesia 2011;107(5):693‐702. [PUBMED: 21857015] - PubMed
Jelenko 1979 {published data only}
    1. Jelenko C 3rd, Solenberger RI, Wheeler ML, Callaway BD. Shock and resuscitation. III. Accurate refractometric COP determinations in hypovolemia treated with HALFD. JACEP 1979;8(7):253‐6. [PUBMED: 449157] - PubMed
    1. Jelenko C 3rd, Wheeler ML, Callaway BD, Divilio LT, Bucklen KR, Holdredge TD. Shock and resuscitation. II: volume repletion with minimal edema using the "HALFD" (Hypertonic Albuminated Fluid Demand) regimen. JACEP 1978;7(9):326‐33. [PUBMED: 45702] - PubMed
    1. Jelenko C 3rd, Williams JB, Wheeler ML, Callaway BD, Fackler VK, Albers CA, et al. Studies in shock and resuscitation, I: use of a hypertonic, albumin‐containing, fluid demand regimen (HALFD) in resuscitation. Critical Care Medicine 1979;7(4):157‐67. [PUBMED: 446052] - PubMed
Jie 2015 {published data only}
    1. Jie L, Tong L, Fang L, Youzhong A. The influence of hydroxyethyl starch on exogenous coagulation and active protein C in patients with septic shock. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2015;27(1):28‐32. [PUBMED: 25591433] - PubMed
Kumar 2017 {published data only}
    1. Kumar S. Audit of preoperative fluid resuscitation in perforation peritonitis patients using physiological and operative severity score for enumeration of mortality and morbidity. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock 2017;10(1):7‐12. [PUBMED: 28243006] - PMC - PubMed
Li 2008 {published data only}
    1. Li F, Sun H, Han XD. The effect of different fluids on early fluid resuscitation in septic shock. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2008;20(8):472‐5. [PUBMED: 18687174] - PubMed
Lowe 1977 {published data only}
    1. Lowe RJ, Moss GS, Jilek J, Levine HD. Crystalloid versus colloid in the etiology of pulmonary failure after trauma ‐ a randomized trial in man. Critical Care Medicine 1979;7(3):107‐12. [PUBMED: 436425] - PubMed
    1. Lowe RJ, Moss GS, Jilek J, Levine HD. Crystalloid vs colloid in the etiology of pulmonary failure after trauma: a randomized trial in man. Surgery 1977;81(6):676‐83. [PUBMED: 860200] - PubMed
    1. Moss GS, Lowe RJ, Jilek J, Levine HD. Colloid or crystalloid in the resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock: a controlled clinical trial. Surgery 1981;89(4):434‐8. [PUBMED: 7010650] - PubMed
Lu 2012 {published data only}
    1. Lu J, Zhao HY, Liu F, An YZ. The influence of lactate Ringer solution versus hydroxyethyl starch on coagulation and fibrinolytic system in patients with septic shock. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2012;24(1):38‐41. [PUBMED: 22248750] - PubMed
Lucas 1978 {published data only}
    1. Clift DR, Lucas CE, Ledgerwood AM, Sardesai V, Kithier K, Grabow D. The effect of albumin resuscitation for shock on the immune response to tetanus toxoid. Journal of Surgical Research 1982;32(5):449‐52. [PUBMED: 7087432] - PubMed
    1. Johnson SD, Lucas CE, Gerrick SJ, Ledgerwood AM, Higgins RF. Altered coagulation after albumin supplements for treatment of oligemic shock. Archives of Surgery 1979;114(4):379‐83. [PUBMED: 435053] - PubMed
    1. Lucas CE, Bouwman DL, Ledgerwood AM, Higgins R. Differential serum protein changes following supplemental albumin resuscitation for hypovolemic shock. Journal of Trauma‐Injury Infection & Critical Care 1980;20(1):47‐51. [PUBMED: 7351677] - PubMed
    1. Lucas CE, Weaver D, Higgins RF, Ledgerwood AM, Johnson SD, Bouwman DL. Effects of albumin versus non‐albumin resuscitation on plasma volume and renal excretory function. Journal of Trauma‐Injury Infection & Critical Care 1978;18(8):564‐70. [PUBMED: 682218] - PubMed
    1. Weaver DW, Ledgerwood AM, Lucas CE, Higgins R, Bouwman DL, Johnson SD. Pulmonary effects of albumin resuscitation for severe hypovolemic shock. Archives of Surgery 1978;113(4):387‐92. [PUBMED: 637709] - PubMed
Mahrous 2013 {published data only}
    1. Mahrous A, Elsammk M, Megahed M, Zytoun T. Renal effect of colloid versus crystalloid in septic neutropenic patients. Critical Care Medicine 2013;1:A250. [PUBMED: 71534173]
Maitland 2005 {published data only}
    1. Maitland K, Pamba A, English M, Peshu N, Marsh K, Newton C, et al. Randomized trial of volume expansion with albumin or saline in children with severe malaria: preliminary evidence of albumin benefit. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2005;40(4):538‐45. [PUBMED: 15712076 ] - PubMed
Maitland 2011 {published data only}
    1. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, Engoru C, Olupot‐Olupot P, Akech SO, et al. Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;364(26):2483‐95. [PUBMED: 21615299] - PubMed
Martin 2005 {published data only}
    1. Martin GS, Moss M, Wheeler AP, Mealer M, Morris JA, Bernard GR. A randomized, controlled trial of furosemide with or without albumin in hypoproteinemic patients with acute lung injury. Critical Care Medicine 2005;33(8):1681‐7. [PUBMED: 16096441] - PubMed
Masoumi 2016 {published data only}
    1. Masoumi K, Forouzan A, Darian AA, Rafaty Navaii A. Comparison of the effectiveness of hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) solution with normal saline in hemorrhagic shock treatment in trauma. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 2016;8(11):815‐8. [PUBMED: 27738483] - PMC - PubMed
Mattox 1991 {published data only}
    1. Mattox KL, Maningas PA, Moore EE, Mateer JR, Marx JA, Aprahamian C, et al. Prehospital hypertonic saline/dextran infusion for post‐traumatic hypotension. The U.S.A. Multicenter Trial. Annals of Surgery 1991;213(5):482‐91. [PUBMED: 1708984] - PMC - PubMed
McIntyre 2008 {published data only}
    1. McIntyre LA, Fergusson D, Cook DJ, Rankin N, Dhingra V, Granton J, et al. Fluid resuscitation in the management of early septic shock (FINESS): a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2008;55(12):819‐26. [PUBMED: 19050085] - PubMed
McIntyre 2012 {published data only}
    1. McIntyre LA, Fergusson DA, Cook DJ, Rowe BH, Bagshaw SM, Easton D, et al. Fluid resuscitation with 5% albumin versus normal saline in early septic shock: a pilot randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Critical Care 2012;27(3):317.e1‐6. [PUBMED: 22176806] - PubMed
Metildi 1984 {published data only}
    1. Metildi LA, Shackford SR, Virgilio RW, Peters RM. Crystalloid versus colloid in fluid resuscitation of patients with severe pulmonary insufficiency. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 1984;158(3):207‐12. [PUBMED: 6701732] - PubMed
Modig 1986 {published data only}
    1. Modig J. Advantages of dextran 70 over Ringer acetate solution in shock treatment and in prevention of adult respiratory distress syndrome. A randomized study in man after traumatic‐haemorrhagic shock. Resuscitation 1983;10(4):219‐26. [PUBMED: 6196822] - PubMed
    1. Modig J. Effectiveness of dextran 70 versus Ringer's acetate in traumatic shock and adult respiratory distress syndrome. Critical Care Medicine 1986;14(5):454‐7. [PUBMED: 16081356] - PubMed
Morrison 2011 {published data only}
    1. Morrison LJ, Baker AJ, Rhind SG, Kiss A, MacDonald RD, Schwartz B, et al. The Toronto prehospital hypertonic resuscitation‐head injury and multiorgan dysfunction trial: feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Critical Care 2011;26(4):363‐72. [PUBMED: 51162409] - PubMed
    1. Morrison LJ, Rizoli SB, Schwartz B, Rhind SG, Simitcui M, Perreira T, et al. The Toronto prehospital hypertonic resuscitation‐head injury and multiorgan dysfunction trial (TOPHR‐HIT) ‐ methods and data collection tools. Trials 2009;10:105. [DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-105] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhind SG, Crnko NT, Baker AJ, Morrison LJ, Shek PN, Scarpelini S, et al. Prehospital resuscitation with hypertonic saline‐dextran modulates inflammatory, coagulation and endothelial activation marker profiles in severe traumatic brain injured patients. Journal of Neuroinflammation 2010;7:5. [PUBMED: 20082712] - PMC - PubMed
Myburgh 2012 {published data only}
    1. Myburgh J, Bellomo R, Cass A, French J, Finfer S, Gattas D, et al. The crystalloid versus hydroxyethyl starch trial: protocol for a multi‐centre randomised controlled trial of fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) compared to 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) in intensive care patients on mortality. Intensive Care Medicine 2011;37(5):816‐23. [PUBMED: 21308360] - PubMed
    1. Myburgh J, Li Q, Heritier S, Dan A, Glass P. Statistical analysis plan for the crystalloid versus hydroxyethyl starch trial (CHEST). Critical Care & Resuscitation 2012;14(1):44‐52. Erratum appears in Critical Care & Resuscitation 2012; 14(2):164. [PUBMED: 22404061] - PubMed
    1. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;367(20):1901‐11. [PUBMED: 23075127] - PubMed
    1. NCT00935168. A multicentre randomized controlled trial of fluid resuscitation with starch (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4) compared to saline (0.9% sodium chloride) in intensive care patients on mortality. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00935168 (first received 1 July 2009). [PUBMED: 23604905] - PubMed
    1. Patel A, Pieper K, Myburgh JA, Perkovic V, Finfer S, Yang Q, et al. Reanalysis of the crystalloid versus hydroxyethyl starch trial (CHEST). New England Journal of Medicine 2017;377(3):298‐300. [PUBMED: 28723325] - PubMed
Nagy 1993 {published data only}
    1. Nagy KK, Davis J, Duda J, Fildes J, Roberts R, Barrett J. A comparison of pentastarch and lactated Ringer's solution in the resuscitation of patients with hemorrhagic shock. Circulatory Shock 1993;40(4):289‐94. [PUBMED: 7690689] - PubMed
Ngo 2001 {published data only}
    1. Ngo NT, Cao XT, Kneen R, Wills B, Nguyen VM, Nguyen TQ, et al. Acute management of dengue shock syndrome: a randomized double‐blind comparison of 4 intravenous fluid regimens in the first hour. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2001;32(2):204‐13. [PUBMED: 11170909] - PubMed
O'Mara 2005 {published data only}
    1. O'Mara MS, Slater H, Goldfarb IW, Caushaj PF. A prospective, randomized evaluation of intra‐abdominal pressures with crystalloid and colloid resuscitation in burn patients. Journal of Trauma 2005;58(5):1011‐8. [PUBMED: 15920417] - PubMed
Oliveira 2002 {published data only}
    1. Oliveira RP, Weingartner R, Ribas EO, Moraes RS, Friedman G. Acute haemodynamic effects of a hypertonic saline/dextran solution in stable patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine 2002;28(11):1574‐81. [PUBMED: 12415443] - PubMed
Park 2015 {published data only}
    1. Park C, Osawa E, Almeida J, Nakamura R, Duayer I, Fukushima J, et al. Lactated Ringer versus albumin in early sepsis therapy (RASP) study: preliminary data of a randomized controlled trial. Critical Care 2015;1:S125. [PUBMED: 71938758]
Perner 2012 {published data only}
    1. Anthon CT, Muller RB, Haase N, Hjortrup PB, Moller K, Lange T, et al. Effects of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 vs. Ringer's acetate on cytokine levels in severe sepsis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2017;61(8):904‐13. [PUBMED: 28653377] - PubMed
    1. Haase N, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Perner A. Bleeding and risk of death with hydroxyethyl starch in severe sepsis: post hoc analyses of a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Medicine 2013;39(12):2126‐34. [PUBMED: 24081433] - PubMed
    1. Haase N, Wetterslev J, Winkel P, Perner A. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 versus Ringer's acetate in severe sepsis: post‐hoc analyses of coagulation, bleeding and transfusion in a randomised trial. Intensive Care Medicine 2013;39(2):S213. [DOI: ] - PubMed
    1. Haase NR. Hydroxyethyl starch in sepsis. Danish Medical Journal 2014;61(1):B4764. [PUBMED: 24393593] - PubMed
    1. Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Perner A. Associations of hospital and patient characteristics with fluid resuscitation volumes in patients with severe sepsis: post hoc analyses of data from a multicentre randomised clinical trial. PLOS One 2016;11(5):e0155767. [PUBMED: 27196104] - PMC - PubMed
Philips 2015 {published data only}
    1. Philips CA, Choudhury AK, Sahney A, Maiwall R, Mitra LG, Sarin SK. Comparison and outcomes of 5% albumin vs 0.9% normal saline fluid resuscitation in cirrhotics presenting with sepsis induced hypotension‐a randomized controlled trial‐fluid resuscitation in septic shock in cirrhosis (FRISC Protocol). Hepatology 2015;62:261a. [Issn Print: 0270‐9139]
Pockaj 1994 {published data only}
    1. Pockaj BA, Yang JC, Lotze MT, Lange JR, Spencer WF, Steinberg SM, et al. A prospective randomized trial evaluating colloid versus crystalloid resuscitation in the treatment of the vascular leak syndrome associated with interleukin‐2 therapy. Journal of Immunotherapy with Emphasis on Tumor Immunology 1994;15(1):22‐8. [PUBMED: 8110727] - PubMed
Quinlan 2004 {published data only}
    1. Quinlan GJ, Mumby S, Martin GS, Bernard GR, Gutteridge JM, Evans TW. Albumin influences total plasma antioxidant capacity favorably in patients with acute lung injury. Critical Care Medicine 2004;32(3):755‐9. [PUBMED: 15090958] - PubMed
Rackow 1983 {published data only}
    1. Haupt MT, Rackow EC. Colloid osmotic pressure and fluid resuscitation with hetastarch, albumin, and saline solutions. Critical Care Medicine 1982;10(3):159‐62. [PUBMED: 6174274] - PubMed
    1. Kaufman BS, Rackow EC, Falk JL. Fluid resuscitation in circulatory shock. Colloids versus crystalloids. Current Studies in Hematology & Blood Transfusion 1986;53:186‐98. [PUBMED: 3536330] - PubMed
    1. Rackow EC, Falk JL, Fein IA, Siegel JS, Packman MI, Haupt MT, et al. Fluid resuscitation in circulatory shock: a comparison of the cardiorespiratory effects of albumin, hetastarch, and saline solutions in patients with hypovolemic and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine 1983;11(11):839‐50. [PUBMED: 14245570] - PubMed
Shah 1977 {published data only}
    1. Shah DM, Browner BD, Dutton RE, Newell JC, Powers JC Jr. Cardiac output and pulmonary wedge pressure. Use for evaluation of fluid replacement in trauma patients. Archives of Surgery 1977;112(10):1161‐8. [PUBMED: 907460] - PubMed
Upadhyay 2005 {published data only}
    1. Upadhyay M, Singhi S, Murlidharan J, Kaur N, Majumdar S. Randomized evaluation of fluid resuscitation with crystalloid (saline) and colloid (polymer from degraded gelatin in saline) in pediatric septic shock. Indian Pediatrics 2005;42(3):223‐31. [PUBMED: 40461538] - PubMed
Van der Heijden 2009 {published data only}
    1. Smorenberg A, Groeneveld AB. Diuretic response to colloid and crystalloid fluid loading in critically ill patients. Journal of Nephrology 2015;28(1):89‐95. [PUBMED: 24828327] - PubMed
    1. Spoelstra‐de Man AM, Smorenberg A, Groeneveld AB. Different effects of fluid loading with saline, gelatine, hydroxyethyl starch or albumin solutions on acid‐base status in the critically ill. PLOS One 2017;12(4):e0174507. [PUBMED: 28380062] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trof RJ, Sukul SP, Twisk JW, Girbes AR, Groeneveld AB. Greater cardiac response of colloid than saline fluid loading in septic and non‐septic critically ill patients with clinical hypovolaemia. Intensive Care Medicine 2010;36(4):697‐701. [PUBMED: 20165941] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heijden M, Verheij J, Nieuw Amerongen GP, Groeneveld AB. Crystalloid or colloid fluid loading and pulmonary permeability, edema, and injury in septic and nonseptic critically ill patients with hypovolemia. Critical Care Medicine 2009;37(4):1275‐81. [PUBMED: 19242338] - PubMed
Vassar 1990 {published data only}
    1. Holcroft JW, Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Gannaway WL, Kramer GC. Use of a 7.5% NaCl/6% dextran 70 solution in the resuscitation of injured patients in the emergency room. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 1989;299:331‐8. [PUBMED: 2471213] - PubMed
    1. Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Holcroft JW. Analysis of potential risks associated with 7.5% sodium chloride resuscitation of traumatic shock. Archives of Surgery 1990;125(10):1309‐15. Erratum in Archives of Surgery 1991; 126(1):43. [PUBMED: 1699508] - PubMed
Vassar 1991 {published data only}
    1. Holcroft JW, Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Gannaway WL, Kramer GC. Perspectives on clinical trials for hypertonic saline/dextran solutions for the treatment of traumatic shock. Brazilian Journal of Medical & Biological Research 1989;22(2):291‐3. [PUBMED: 2477096] - PubMed
    1. Holcroft JW, Vassar MJ, Turner JE, Derlet RW, Kramer GC. 3% NaCl and 7.5% NaCl/dextran 70 in the resuscitation of severely injured patients. Annals of Surgery 1987;206(3):279‐88. [PUBMED: 2443087] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Gannaway WL, Holcroft JW. 7.5% sodium chloride/dextran for resuscitation of trauma patients undergoing helicopter transport. Archives of Surgery 1991;126(9):1065‐72. [PUBMED: 1718243] - PubMed
Vassar 1993a {published data only}
    1. Vassar MJ, Fischer RP, O'Brien PE, Bachulis BL, Chambers JA, Hoyt DB, et al. A multicenter trial for resuscitation of injured patients with 7.5% sodium chloride. The effect of added dextran 70. The Multicenter Group for the Study of Hypertonic Saline in Trauma Patients. Archives of Surgery 1993;128(9):1003‐11; discussion 1011‐3. [PUBMED: 7690225] - PubMed
Vassar 1993b {published data only}
    1. Vassar MJ, Perry CA, Holcroft JW. Prehospital resuscitation of hypotensive trauma patients with 7.5% NaCl versus 7.5% NaCl with added dextran: a controlled trial. Journal of Trauma 1993;34(5):622‐32; discussion 632‐3. [PUBMED: 7684457] - PubMed
Vlachou 2010 {published data only}
    1. Vlachou E, Gosling P, Moiemen NS. Hydroxyethylstarch supplementation in burn resuscitation ‐ a prospective randomised controlled trial. Burns 2010;36(7):984‐91. [PUBMED: 20558004] - PubMed
Wills 2005 {published data only}
    1. Wills BA, Dung NM, Loan HT, Tam DT, Thuy TT, Minh LT, et al. Comparison of three fluid solutions for resuscitation in dengue shock syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2005;353(9):877‐89. [PUBMED: 16135832] - PubMed
Wu 2001 {published data only}
    1. Wu JJ, Huang MS, Tang GJ, Kao WF, Shih HC, Su CH, et al. Hemodynamic response of modified fluid gelatin compared with lactated Ringer's solution for volume expansion in emergency resuscitation of hypovolemic shock patients: preliminary report of a prospective, randomized trial. World Journal of Surgery 2001;25(5):598‐602. [PUBMED: 11369986] - PubMed
Younes 1992 {published data only}
    1. Younes RN, Aun F, Accioly CQ, Casale LP, Szajnbok I, Birolini D. Hypertonic solutions in the treatment of hypovolemic shock: a prospective, randomized study in patients admitted to the emergency room. Surgery 1992;111(4):380‐5. [PUBMED: 1373007] - PubMed
Younes 1997 {published data only}
    1. Younes RN, Aun F, Ching C, Goldenberg D, Franco M, Miura F, Santos S, et al. Prognosis following the administration of hypertonic/hyperoncotic solutions in hypovolemic patients. Program and abstracts. International Conference on Hypertonic Resuscitation (6th) (SALT 6); 1994 Jun 2‐3; Teton Village (WY). 1994.
    1. Younes RN, Aun F, Ching CT, Goldenberg DC, Franco MH, Miura FK, et al. Prognostic factors to predict outcome following the administration of hypertonic/hyperoncotic solution in hypovolemic patients. Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 1997;7(2):79‐83. [PUBMED: 9035281] - PubMed
Younes 1998 {published data only}
    1. Younes RN, Yin KC, Amino CJ, Itinoshe M, Rocha e Silva M, Birolini D. Use of pentastarch solution in the treatment of patients with hemorrhagic hypovolemia: randomized phase II study in the emergency room. World Journal of Surgery 1998;22(1):2‐5. [PUBMED: 9465753] - PubMed
Zhao 2013 {published data only}
    1. Zhao G, Zhang J‐G, Wu H‐S, Tao J, Qin Q, Deng S‐C, et al. Effects of different resuscitation fluid on severe acute pancreatitis. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2013;19(13):2044‐52. [PUBMED: 23599623] - PMC - PubMed
Zhu 2011 {published data only}
    1. Zhu GC, Quan ZY, Shao YS, Zhao JG, Zhang YT. The study of hypertonic saline and hydroxyethyl starch treating severe sepsis. Chinese Critical Care Medicine 2011;23(3):150‐3. [PUBMED: 361547296] - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Boutros 1979 {published data only}
    1. Boutros AR, Ruess R, Olson L, Hoyt JL, Baker WH. Comparison of hemodynamic, pulmonary, and renal effects of use of three types of fluids after major surgical procedures on the abdominal aorta. Critical Care Medicine 1979;7(1):9‐13. [PUBMED: 367709] - PubMed
Bowser‐Wallace 1986 {published data only}
    1. Bowser‐Wallace BH, Caldwell FT Jr. Fluid requirements of severely burned children up to 3 years old: hypertonic lactated saline vs. Ringer's lactate‐colloid. Burns 1986;12(8):549‐55. [PUBMED: 3454687] - PubMed
Dawidson 1991 {published data only}
    1. Dawidson IJ, Willms CD, Sandor ZF, Coorpender LL, Reisch JS, Fry WJ. Ringer's lactate with or without 3% dextran‐60 as volume expanders during abdominal aortic surgery. Critical Care Medicine 1991;19(1):36‐42. [PUBMED: 1702696] - PubMed
Dehne 2001 {published data only}
    1. Dehne MG, Mühling J, Sablotzki A, Dehne K, Sucke N, Hempelmann G. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) does not directly affect renal function in patients with no prior renal impairment. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2001;13(2):103‐11. [PUBMED: 11331169] - PubMed
Eleftheriadis 1995 {published data only}
    1. Eleftheriadis S, Sedemund Adib B, Klotz KF, Hubner N, Kuppe H. Volume replacement after cardiac surgery: comparison of Ringer, HES 6% and gelatine 3.5%. Intensive Care Medicine 1995;21(Suppl 1):S216.
Evans 2003 {published data only}
    1. Evans PA, Heptinstall S, Crowhurst EC, Davies T, Glenn JR, Madira W, et al. Prospective double‐blind randomized study of the effects of four intravenous fluids on platelet function and hemostasis in elective hip surgery. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 2003;10(1):2140‐8. [PUBMED: 14521596] - PubMed
Fries 2004 {published data only}
    1. Fries D, Streif W, Margreiter J, Klingler A, Kuhbacher G, Schobersberger W, et al. The effects of perioperatively administered crystalloids and colloids on concentrations of molecular markers of activated coagulation and fibrinolysis. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis 2004;15(3):213‐9. [PUBMED: 15060416] - PubMed
Gallagher 1985 {published data only}
    1. Gallagher JD, Moore RA, Kerns D, Jose AB, Botros SB, Flicker S, et al. Effects of colloid or crystalloid administration on pulmonary extravascular water in the postoperative period after coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1985;64(8):753‐8. [PUBMED: 2409845] - PubMed
Grundmann 1982 {published data only}
    1. Grundmann R, Heistermann S. Postoperative albumin infusion therapy based on colloid osmotic pressure. A prospectively randomized trial. Archives of Surgery 1985;120(8):911‐5. [PUBMED: 3893389] - PubMed
    1. Grundmann R, Meyer H. The significance of colloid osmotic pressure measurement after crystalloid and colloid infusions. Intensive Care Medicine 1982;8(4):179‐86. [PUBMED: 7119271] - PubMed
Guo 2003 {published data only}
    1. Guo XY, Xu ZH, Ren HZ, Luo AL, Huang YG, Ye TH. Effect of volume replacement with hydroxyethyl starch solution for blood loss on splanchnic oxygenation in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian carcinoma. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003;83(2):114‐7. [PUBMED: 12812678] - PubMed
Hartmann 1993 {published data only}
    1. Hartmann M, Jonsson K, Zederfeldt B. Effects of dextran and crystalloids on subcutaneous oxygen tension and collagen accumulation. A randomized study in surgical patients. European Surgical Research 1993;25(5):270‐7. [PUBMED: 7691604] - PubMed
Hondebrink 1997 {published data only}
    1. Hondebrink Y, Jeekel L, Nijhuis JO, Woittiez AJ. Restoration of colloid osmotic pressure in hypoalbuminaemic patients. Intensive Care Medicine 1997;23(Suppl 1):S184.
    1. Timmer B, Hondebrink J, Oude Nijhuis J, Woittiez AJ. Restoration of colloid osmotic pressure in hypoalbuminaemic patients. Netherlands Journal of Medicine 1998;52:A42.
Karanko 1987 {published data only}
    1. Karanko MS, Klossner JA, Laaksonen VO. Restoration of volume by crystalloid versus colloid after coronary artery bypass: hemodynamics, lung water, oxygenation, and outcome. Critical Care Medicine 1987;15(6):559‐66. [PUBMED: 2436856] - PubMed
Lee 2011 {published data only}
    1. Lee JS, Ahn SW, Song JW, Shim JK, Yoo KJ, Kwak YL. Effect of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on blood loss and coagulation in patients with recent exposure to dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing off‐pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation Journal 2011;75(10):2397‐402. [PUBMED: 21817820] - PubMed
Ley 1990 {published data only}
    1. Ley SJ, Miller K, Skov P, Preisig P. Crystalloid versus colloid fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Heart and Lung: Journal of Critical Care 1990;19(1):31‐40. [PUBMED: 20045823] - PubMed
Mazher 1998 {published data only}
    1. Mazhar R, Samenesco A, Royston D, Rees A. Cardiopulmonary effects of 7.2% saline solution compared with gelatin infusion in the early postoperative period after coronary artery bypass grafting. Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery 1998;115(1):178‐89. [PUBMED: 9451062 ] - PubMed
McNulty 1993 {published data only}
    1. McNulty SE, Sharkey SJ, Asam B, Lee JH. Evaluation of STAT‐CRIT hematocrit determination in comparison to Coulter and centrifuge: the effects of isotonic hemodilution and albumin administration. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1993;76(4):830‐4. [PUBMED: 23107606] - PubMed
Moretti 2003 {published data only}
    1. Moretti EW, Robertson KM, El‐Moalem H, Gan TJ. Intraoperative colloid administration reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves postoperative outcomes compared with crystalloid administration. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003;96(2):611‐7. [PUBMED: 12538221] - PubMed
Nielsen 1985 {published data only}
    1. Nielsen OM, Engell HC. Extracellular fluid volume and distribution in relation to changes in plasma colloid osmotic pressure after major surgery. A randomized study. Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica 1985;151(3):221‐5. [PUBMED: 3892993] - PubMed
Prien 1990 {published data only}
    1. Prien T, Backhaus N, Pelster F, Pircher W, Bunte H, Lawin P. Effect of intraoperative fluid administration and colloid osmotic pressure on the formation of intestinal edema during gastrointestinal surgery. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1990;2(5):317‐23. [PUBMED: 1702977 ] - PubMed
Rocha e Silva 1994 {published data only}
    1. Rocha e Silva M, Poli de Figueiredo LF. Hypertonic‐hyperoncotic saline solution for the treatment of post‐traumatic hypotension in the emergency room. The Brazilian multi‐center trial. Program and abstracts. International Conference on Hypertonic Resuscitation (6th) (SALT 6); 1994 Jun 2‐3; Teton Village (WY). 1994.
Shires 1983 {published data only}
    1. Shires GT 3rd, Peitzman AB, Albert SA, Illner H, Silane MF, Perry MO, et al. Response of extravascular lung water to intraoperative fluids. Annals of Surgery 1983;197(5):515‐9. [PUBMED: 6847271] - PMC - PubMed
Sirieix 1999 {published data only}
    1. Sirieix D, Hongnat JM, Delayance S, D'Attellis N, Vicaut E, Berrebi A, et al. Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of hypertonic or colloid infusions immediately after mitral valve repair. Critical Care Medicine 1999;27(10):2159‐65. [PUBMED: 10548199 ] - PubMed
Skillman 1975 {published data only}
    1. Skillman JJ, Restall DS, Salzman EW. Randomized trial of albumin vs. electrolyte solutions during abdominal aortic operations. Surgery 1975;78(3):291‐303. [PUBMED: 1154272 ] - PubMed
Tollusfrud 1995 {published data only}
    1. Tollofsrud S, Svennevig JL, Breivik H, Kongsgaard U, Ozer M, Hysing E, et al. Fluid balance and pulmonary functions during and after coronary artery bypass surgery: Ringer's acetate compared with dextran, polygeline, or albumin. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1995;39(5):671‐7. [PUBMED: 7572019] - PubMed
Tollusfrud 1998 {published data only}
    1. Tollofsrud S, Noddeland H. Hypertonic saline and dextran after coronary artery surgery mobilises fluid excess and improves cardiorespiratory functions. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1998;42(2):154‐61. [PUBMED: 9509195] - PubMed
Verheij 2006 {published data only}
    1. Verheij J, Lingen A, Beishuizen A, Christiaans HM, Jong JR, Girbes AR, et al. Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery. Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32(7):1030‐8. [PUBMED: 16791665] - PubMed
Virgilio 1979 {published data only}
    1. Virgilio RW, Rice CL, Smith DE, James DR, Zarins CK, Hobelmann CF, et al. Crystalloid vs. colloid resuscitation: is one better? A randomized clinical study. Surgery 1979;85(2):129‐39. [PUBMED: 419454] - PubMed
Wahba 1996 {published data only}
    1. Wahba A, Sendtner E, Strotzer M, Wild K, Birnbaum DE. Fluid therapy with Ringer's solution versus Haemaccel following coronary artery bypass surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1996;40(10):1227‐33. [PUBMED: 8986187] - PubMed
Zetterstorm 1981a {published data only}
    1. Zetterstrom H, Hedstrand U. Albumin treatment following major surgery. I. Effects on plasma oncotic pressure, renal function and peripheral oedema. Acta Anaesthesioligica Scandinavica 1981;25(2):125‐32. [PUBMED: 7324819 ] - PubMed
Zetterstorm 1981b {published data only}
    1. Zetterstrom H. Albumin treatment following major surgery. II. Effects on postoperative lung function and circulatory adaptation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1981;25(2):133‐41. [PUBMED: 7324820 ] - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Bulanov 2004 {published data only}
    1. Bulanov AI, Gorodetskii VM, Shulutko EM, Vasil'ev SA, Orel EB, Malofeev VN, et al. Effect of different colloid volume‐replacing solutions on a changed hemostasis system. Anesteziologiia i Reanimatologiia 2004;2:25‐30. [PUBMED: 15206272] - PubMed
Charpentier 2011 {published data only}
    1. Charpentier J, Mira J‐P. Efficacy and tolerance of hyperoncotic albumin administration in septic shock patients: the EARSS study. Intensive Care Medicine 2011;37(Suppl 1):S115.
Halim 2016 {published data only}
    1. Abd El Halim MA, Elsaid Hafez MH, Moktar AM, Eladawy A, Elazizy HM. Impact of gelatins on perfusion of microcirculatory blood flow in patient with septic shock. In: 29th Annual Congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), 2016 Oct 1‐5; Milan (Italy). Intensive Care Medicine Experimental 2016.
NCT00890383 {published data only}
    1. NCT00890383. Colloids in severe trauma [Colloids in severe trauma: a multi‐center pilot study of "crystalloid only" or "crystalloid + colloid" volume resuscitation in trauma patients (CIST)]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT00890383 (first received 29 April 2009).
NCT01337934 {published data only}
    1. NCT01337934. Ringer versus albumin in septic patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial [Lactated Ringer versus albumin in early sepsis therapy (RASP)]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01337934 (first received 13 April 2011).
NCT02064075 {published data only}
    1. NCT02064075. The mortality and changes in quality of life of patients suffering from SAH with different hydration strategies [Phase 4 prospective, randomized, blinded study on the effect of different hydration strategies on mortality and changes in quality of life of patients suffering from subarachnoid haemorrhage]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02064075 (first received 17 February 2014).
Protsenko 2009 {published data only}
    1. Protsenko DN, Leiderman IN, Grigor'ev EV, Kokarev EA, Levit AL, Gel'fand BR. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of synthetic colloid solutions in the treatment of severe abdominal sepsis: a randomized comparative study. Anesteziologiia i Reanimatologiia 2009;5:9‐13. [PUBMED: 19938709] - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

NCT01763853 {published data only}
    1. NCT01763853. Impact of fluid resuscitation therapy on pulmonary edema as measured by alveolar fluid clearance in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01763853 (first received 9 January 2013).
NCT02721238 {published data only}
    1. NCT02721238. Comparison of colloid (20% albumin) versus crystalloid (Plasmalyte) for fluid resuscitation in cirrhotics with sepsis induced hypotension. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02721238 (first received 29 March 2016).
NCT02782819 {published data only}
    1. NCT02782819. A comparison of crystalloid alone versus crystalloid plus colloid in shock resuscitation [A randomized controlled trial of crystalloid alone versus crystalloid plus colloid in shock resuscitation]. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02782819 (first received 16 May 2016).

Additional references

Bailey 2010
    1. Bailey AG, McNaull PP, Jooste E, Tuchman JB. Perioperative crystalloid and colloid fluid management in children: where are we and how did we get here?. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2010;110(2):375‐90. [PUBMED: 19955503] - PubMed
Bampoe 2017
    1. Bampoe S, Odor PM, Dushianthan A, Bennett‐Guerrero E, Cro S, Gan TJ, et al. Perioperative administration of buffered versus non‐buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve outcomes following adult surgical procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004089.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Coppola 2014
    1. Coppola S, Froio S, Chiumello D. Fluid resuscitation in trauma patients: what should we know?. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2014;20(4):444‐50. [PUBMED: 24927043] - PubMed
Covidence [Computer program]
    1. Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence. Melbourne (Australia): Veritas Health Innovation, (accessed 23 February 2018).
de Crescenzo 2017
    1. Crescenzo C, Gorouhi F, Salcedo ES, Galante JM. Prehospital hypertonic fluid resuscitation for trauma patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2017;82(5):956‐62. [PUBMED: 28257392] - PubMed
Deeks 2017
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG, editor(s) on behalf of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses.In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS, editor(s), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2017. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629‐34. [PUBMED: 9310563] - PMC - PubMed
Eljaiek 2017
    1. Eljaiek R, Heylbroeck C, Dubois MJ. Albumin administration for fluid resuscitation in burn patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Burns 2017;43(1):17‐24. [PUBMED: 27613476] - PubMed
Endnote [Computer program]
    1. Thomson Reuters. Endnote X5. Philadelphia (PA): Thomson Reuters, 2011.
Gattas 2013
    1. Gattas DJ, Dan A, Myburgh J, Billot L, Lo S, Finfer S. Fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) in acutely ill patients: systematic review of effects on mortality and treatment with renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Medicine 2013;39(4):558‐68. [PUBMED: 23407978] - PubMed
Geeraedts 2009
    1. Geeraedts LM Jr, Kaasjager HA, Vugt AB, Frolke JP. Exsanguination in trauma: a review of diagnostics and treatment options. Injury 2009;40(1):11‐20. [PUBMED: 19135193] - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT 2015 [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed 23 February 2018. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime), 2015.
Guyatt 2008
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck‐Ytter Y, Schunemann HJ. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336(7651):995‐8. [PUBMED: 18456631] - PMC - PubMed
Guyatt 2011a
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ inconsistency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1294‐302. [PUBMED: 21803546] - PubMed
Guyatt 2011b
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso‐Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence ‐ imprecision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(12):1283‐93. [PUBMED: 21839614] - PubMed
Haase 2013
    1. Haase N, Perner A, Hennings LI, Siegemund M, Lauridsen B, Wetterslev M, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.38‐0.45 versus crystalloid or albumin in patients with sepsis: systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2013;346:f839. [PUBMED: 23418281] - PMC - PubMed
He 2015
    1. He B, Xu B, Xu X, Li L, Ren R, Chen Z, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch versus other fluids for non‐septic patients in the intensive care unit: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care 2015;19:92. [PUBMED: 25886952] - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JP, Deeks J, editor(s). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins 2016
    1. Higgins JP, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews. Cochrane: London, Version 1.02, 2016. Available from community.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/MECIR%20PRINTED%20BOO....
Higgins 2017
    1. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA, editor(s). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS, editor(s), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2017. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Kauvar 2006
    1. Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. The Journal of Trauma 2006;60(6 Suppl):S3‐11. [PUBMED: 16763478] - PubMed
Lewis 2016
    1. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Brammar A, Nicholson A, Smith AF. Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003004.pub4] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Liberati 2009
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta‐analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2009;62(10):e1‐34. [PUBMED: 19631507] - PubMed
McClelland 1998
    1. McClelland DB. Safety of human albumin as a constituent of biologic therapeutic products. Transfusion 1998;38(7):690‐9. [PUBMED: 9683109] - PubMed
Orbegozo 2015
    1. Orbegozo Cortes D, Gamarano Barros T, Njimi H, Vincent JL. Crystalloids versus colloids: exploring differences in fluid requirements by systematic review and meta‐regression. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2015;120(2):389‐402. [PUBMED: 25565318] - PubMed
Peden 2002
    1. Peden M, Hyder A. Road traffic injuries are a global public health problem. BMJ 2002; Vol. 324, issue 7346:1153. [PUBMED: 12003892] - PMC - PubMed
Qureshi 2016
    1. Qureshi SH, Rizvi SI, Patel NN, Murphy GJ. Meta‐analysis of colloids versus crystalloids in critically ill, trauma and surgical patients. The British Journal of Surgery 2016;103(1):14‐26. [PUBMED: 26522616] - PubMed
Reinhart 2012
    1. Reinhart K, Perner A, Sprung CL, Jaeschke R, Schortgen F, Johan Groeneveld AB, et al. Consensus statement of the ESICM task force on colloid volume therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Medicine 2012;38(3):368‐83. [PUBMED: 22323076] - PubMed
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rhodes 2016
    1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Critical Care Medicine 2016;45(3):486‐552. [PUBMED: 28098591] - PubMed
Rossaint 2016
    1. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernandez‐Mondejar E, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Critical Care 2016;20:100. [PUBMED: 27072503] - PMC - PubMed
Shrum 2016
    1. Shrum B, Church B, McArthur E, Burns KEA, Znajda T, McAlister V. Hypertonic salt solution for peri‐operative fluid management. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005576.pub3] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Sterne 2017
    1. Sterne JA, Egger M, Moher D, Boutron I, editor(s). Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases. In: Higgins JP, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS, editor(s), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2017. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Zarychanski 2013
    1. Zarychanski R, Abou‐Setta AM, Turgeon AF, Houston BL, McIntyre L, Marshall JC, et al. Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2013;309(7):678‐88. [PUBMED: 23423413] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Perel 2013
    1. Perel P, Roberts I, Ker K. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub6] - DOI - PubMed
Schierhout 1998
    1. Schierhout G, Roberts I. Fluid resuscitation with colloids or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1998;316:961‐4. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources