Translational Challenges of Rat Models of Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury
- PMID: 29997423
- PMCID: PMC6037323
- DOI: 10.1310/sci2403-195
Translational Challenges of Rat Models of Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury
Abstract
There are approximately 17,500 new spinal cord injury (SCI) cases each year in the United States, with the majority of cases resulting from a traumatic injury. Damage to the spinal cord causes either temporary or permanent changes in sensorimotor function. Given that the majority of human SCIs occur in the cervical spinal level, the experimental animal models of forelimb dysfunction play a large role in the ability to translate basic science research to clinical application. However, the variation in the design of clinical and basic science studies of forelimb/upper extremity (UE) function prevents the ease of translation. This review provides an overview of experimental models of forelimb dysfunction used in SCI research with special emphasis on the rat model of SCI. The anatomical location and types of experimental cervical lesions, functional assessments, and rehabilitation strategies used in the basic science laboratory are reviewed. Finally, we discuss the challenges of translating animal models of forelimb dysfunction to the clinical SCI human population.
Keywords: animal models; forelimb; functional recovery; upper extremity.
Conflict of interest statement
Supported by grants from the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (#457508 MRD) and the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (#NS97880 MRD). We certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated and, if applicable, we certify that all financial and material support for this research (eg, NIH or NHS grants) and work are clearly identified.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Behavioral and histological characterization of unilateral cervical spinal cord contusion injury in rats.J Neurotrauma. 2006 Jan;23(1):36-54. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.36. J Neurotrauma. 2006. PMID: 16430371
-
Quantitative assessment of forelimb motor function after cervical spinal cord injury in rats: relationship to the corticospinal tract.Exp Neurol. 2005 Jul;194(1):161-74. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.02.006. Exp Neurol. 2005. PMID: 15899253
-
Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Review Examining Upper Extremity Neuromotor Control, Recovery Mechanisms, and Future Directions.J Neurotrauma. 2024 Sep;41(17-18):2056-2074. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0438. Epub 2024 Jul 12. J Neurotrauma. 2024. PMID: 38874496 Review.
-
Predicting task performance from upper extremity impairment measures after cervical spinal cord injury.Spinal Cord. 2016 Dec;54(12):1145-1151. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.77. Epub 2016 May 31. Spinal Cord. 2016. PMID: 27241449
-
Sensorimotor behaviour following incomplete cervical spinal cord injury in the rat.Behav Brain Res. 2005 Dec 7;165(2):147-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.07.025. Epub 2005 Sep 12. Behav Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 16157393 Review.
Cited by
-
Neuromodulation to guide circuit reorganization with regenerative therapies in upper extremity rehabilitation following cervical spinal cord injury.Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 3;4:1320211. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1320211. eCollection 2023. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024. PMID: 38234989 Free PMC article.
-
Plasticity in Cervical Motor Circuits following Spinal Cord Injury and Rehabilitation.Biology (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;10(10):976. doi: 10.3390/biology10100976. Biology (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34681075 Free PMC article. Review.
-
When Spinal Neuromodulation Meets Sensorimotor Rehabilitation: Lessons Learned From Animal Models to Regain Manual Dexterity After a Spinal Cord Injury.Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Dec 7;2:755963. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.755963. eCollection 2021. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021. PMID: 36188826 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A translational study of somatosensory evoked potential time-frequency components in rats, goats, and humans.Neural Regen Res. 2021 Nov;16(11):2269-2275. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.310693. Neural Regen Res. 2021. PMID: 33818512 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center Annual Statistical Report for the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Public Version. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham; Updated 2016–2017.
-
- Kalsi-Ryan S, Curt A, Verrier MC, Fehlings MG. Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): Reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17(1 suppl):65–76. doi:10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1258. - PubMed
-
- Snoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: Impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(9):526–532. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638. - PubMed
-
- Allen R. Surgery of experimental lesions of spinal cord equivalent to crush injury of fracture dislocation. Preliminary report. JAMA. 1911;57:878.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical