Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
- PMID: 29589226
- PMCID: PMC6133005
- DOI: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the strength and shape of the dose-response relationship between sedentary behaviour and all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), adjusted for physical activity (PA). Data Sources: Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (through September-2016); reference lists. Study Selection: Prospective studies reporting associations between total daily sedentary time or TV viewing time, and ≥ one outcome of interest. Data Extraction: Two independent reviewers extracted data, study quality was assessed; corresponding authors were approached where needed. Data Synthesis: Thirty-four studies (1,331,468 unique participants; good study quality) covering 8 exposure-outcome combinations were included. For total sedentary behaviour, the PA-adjusted relationship was non-linear for all-cause mortality (RR per 1 h/day: were 1.01 (1.00-1.01) ≤ 8 h/day; 1.04 (1.03-1.05) > 8 h/day of exposure), and for CVD mortality (1.01 (0.99-1.02) ≤ 6 h/day; 1.04 (1.03-1.04) > 6 h/day). The association was linear (1.01 (1.00-1.01)) with T2D and non-significant with cancer mortality. Stronger PA-adjusted associations were found for TV viewing (h/day); non-linear for all-cause mortality (1.03 (1.01-1.04) ≤ 3.5 h/day; 1.06 (1.05-1.08) > 3.5 h/day) and for CVD mortality (1.02 (0.99-1.04) ≤ 4 h/day; 1.08 (1.05-1.12) > 4 h/day). Associations with cancer mortality (1.03 (1.02-1.04)) and T2D were linear (1.09 (1.07-1.12)).
Conclusions: Independent of PA, total sitting and TV viewing time are associated with greater risk for several major chronic disease outcomes. For all-cause and CVD mortality, a threshold of 6-8 h/day of total sitting and 3-4 h/day of TV viewing was identified, above which the risk is increased.
Keywords: Diabetes; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Prevention; Public health; Sedentary.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.JAMA. 2011 Jun 15;305(23):2448-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.812. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21673296 Free PMC article.
-
The Dose-Response Associations of Sedentary Time with Chronic Diseases and the Risk for All-Cause Mortality Affected by Different Health Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1298-3. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020. PMID: 31886810
-
Do the associations of sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer mortality differ by physical activity level? A systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis of data from 850 060 participants.Br J Sports Med. 2019 Jul;53(14):886-894. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098963. Epub 2018 Jul 10. Br J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 29991570
-
Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25599350 Review.
-
Aspirin Use in Adults: Cancer, All-Cause Mortality, and Harms: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. PMID: 26491756 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Frequency of Interruptions to Sitting Time: Benefits for Postprandial Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2021 Jun;44(6):1254-1263. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1410. Epub 2021 Apr 26. Diabetes Care. 2021. PMID: 33905343 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Psychometric properties of the Last-7-Day Sedentary Time Questionnaire (SIT-Q-7d): Testing the validity and reliability among general population.BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):1880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14262-x. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36209048 Free PMC article.
-
Diet Quality, Sedentary Time, and Blood Pressure in the POUCHmoms Study.J Nutr. 2024 Feb;154(2):706-713. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.12.033. Epub 2023 Dec 21. J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38141776 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of socioeconomic factors on lifestyle changes among employees of public higher education institutions in ELSA-Brasil during COVID-19 pandemic.Cad Saude Publica. 2023 Nov 13;39(11):e00047123. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN047123. eCollection 2023. Cad Saude Publica. 2023. PMID: 37970941 Free PMC article.
-
The Hidden Dangers of Sedentary Living: Insights into Molecular, Cellular, and Systemic Mechanisms.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 6;25(19):10757. doi: 10.3390/ijms251910757. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39409085 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dunstan DW, Healy GN, Sugiyama T, Owen N. ‘Too much sitting’ and metabolic risk—has modern technology caught up with us? Eur Endocrinol. 2010;6(1):19–23. doi: 10.17925/EE.2010.06.00.19. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical