Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;101(10):2368-2374.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001851.

Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration

Zinan Yi  1 , Maria E Mayorga, Eric S Orman, Stephanie B Wheeler, Paul H Hayashi, A Sidney Barritt Th
Affiliations

Trends in Characteristics of Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation Will Lead to Higher Rates of Waitlist Removal Due to Clinical Deterioration

Zinan Yi et al. Transplantation. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Changes in the epidemiology of end-stage liver disease may lead to increased risk of dropout from the liver transplant waitlist. Anticipating the future of liver transplant waitlist characteristics is vital when considering organ allocation policy.

Methods: We performed a discrete event simulation to forecast patient characteristics and rate of waitlist dropout. Estimates were simulated from 2015 to 2025. The model was informed by data from the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network, 2003 to 2014. National data are estimated along with forecasts for 2 regions.

Results: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis will increase from 18% of waitlist additions to 22% by 2025. Hepatitis C will fall from 30% to 21%. Listings over age 60 years will increase from 36% to 48%. The hazard of dropout will increase from 41% to 46% nationally. Wait times for transplant for patients listed with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) between 22 and 27 will double. Region 5, which transplants at relatively higher MELD scores, will experience an increase from 53% to 64% waitlist dropout. Region 11, which transplants at lower MELD scores, will have an increase in waitlist dropout from 30% to 44%.

Conclusions: The liver transplant waitlist size will remain static over the next decade due to patient dropout. Liver transplant candidates will be older, more likely to have nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and will wait for transplantation longer even when listed at a competitive MELD score. There will continue to be significant heterogeneity among transplant regions where some patients will be more likely to drop out of the waitlist than receive a transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kabiri M, Jazwinski AB, Roberts MS, Schaefer AJ, Chhatwal J. The changing burden of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: model-based predictions. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(3):170–180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlton M. Cirrhosis and liver failure in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: molehill or mountain? Hepatology. 2008;47(5):1431–1433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Su F, Yu L, Berry K, et al. Aging of liver transplant registrants and recipients: trends and impact on waitlist outcomes, post-transplantation outcomes, and transplant-related survival benefit. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(2):441–453. e446. - PubMed
    1. Yi Z, Mayorga M, Wheeler SB, Hayashi PH, Barritt AS, Orman ES. The numbers of new waitlist registrants and removals are outpacing the number of liver transplants: national trends and regional variation from 2003 through 2014. Abstract presented at: AASLD Liver Meeting; November 13, 2016.2016.
    1. Orman ES, Barritt ASt, Wheeler SB, Hayashi PH. Declining liver utilization for transplant in the United States and the impact of donation after cardiac death. Liver Transpl. 2013;19(1):59–68. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms