Population-based microcephaly surveillance in the United States, 2009 to 2013: An analysis of potential sources of variation
- PMID: 27891783
- PMCID: PMC5485911
- DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23587
Population-based microcephaly surveillance in the United States, 2009 to 2013: An analysis of potential sources of variation
Abstract
Background: Congenital microcephaly has been linked to maternal Zika virus infection. However, ascertaining infants diagnosed with microcephaly can be challenging.
Methods: Thirty birth defects surveillance programs provided data on infants diagnosed with microcephaly born 2009 to 2013. The pooled prevalence of microcephaly per 10,000 live births was estimated overall and by maternal/infant characteristics. Variation in prevalence was examined across case finding methods. Nine programs provided data on head circumference and conditions potentially contributing to microcephaly.
Results: The pooled prevalence of microcephaly was 8.7 per 10,000 live births. Median prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was similar among programs using active (6.7) and passive (6.6) methods; the interdecile range of prevalence estimates was wider among programs using passive methods for all race/ethnicity categories except Hispanic. Prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was lowest among non-Hispanic Whites (6.5) and highest among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics (11.2 and 11.9, respectively); estimates followed a U-shaped distribution by maternal age with the highest prevalence among mothers <20 years (11.5) and ≥40 years (13.2). For gestational age and birth weight, the highest prevalence was among infants <32 weeks gestation and infants <1500 gm. Case definitions varied; 41.8% of cases had an HC ≥ the 10th percentile for sex and gestational age.
Conclusion: Differences in methods, population distribution of maternal/infant characteristics, and case definitions for microcephaly can contribute to the wide range of observed prevalence estimates across individual birth defects surveillance programs. Addressing these factors in the setting of Zika virus infection can improve the quality of prevalence estimates. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:972-982, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: head circumference; microcephaly; prevalence; surveillance.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
A quality assessment of reporting sources for microcephaly in Utah, 2003 to 2013.Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016 Nov;106(11):983-988. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23593. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016. PMID: 27891786 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-Zika descriptive epidemiology of microcephaly in Texas, 2008-2012.Birth Defects Res. 2018 Mar 15;110(5):395-405. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1164. Epub 2017 Nov 24. Birth Defects Res. 2018. PMID: 29171191
-
Association and birth prevalence of microcephaly attributable to Zika virus infection among infants in Paraíba, Brazil, in 2015-16: a case-control study.Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):205-213. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30020-8. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018. PMID: 30169255
-
Microcephaly Prevalence in Infants Born to Zika Virus-Infected Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 5;18(8):1714. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081714. Int J Mol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28783051 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maternal Zika virus infection and newborn microcephaly-an analysis of the epidemiological evidence.Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Ann Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29277550 Review.
Cited by
-
An assessment of public health surveillance of Zika virus infection and potentially associated outcomes in Latin America.BMC Public Health. 2018 May 24;18(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5566-7. BMC Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29793453 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Vaccine. 2023 Jun 7;41(25):3688-3700. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.038. Epub 2023 Mar 27. Vaccine. 2023. PMID: 37012114 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of infectious disease surveillance reports to monitor the Zika virus epidemic in Latin America and the Caribbean from 2015 to 2017: strengths and deficiencies.BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e042869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042869. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33310811 Free PMC article.
-
Population surveillance for microcephaly.BMJ. 2016 Sep 13;354:i4815. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4815. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27623958 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of microcephaly in a pediatric cohort in Brazil: a retrospective cross-sectional study.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021 Jul-Aug;97(4):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Oct 18. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021. PMID: 33086050 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ashwal S, Michelson D, Plawner L, Dobyns WB, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2009;73:887–897. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Baxter PS, Rigby AS, Rotsaert MH, Wright I. Acquired microcephaly: causes, patterns, motor and IQ effects, and associated growth changes. Pediatrics. 2009;124:590–595. - PubMed
-
- Bray PF, Shields WD, Wolcott GJ, Madsen JA. Occipitofrontal head circumference – an accurate measure of intracranial volume. J Pediatr. 1969;75:303–305. - PubMed
-
- Clopper CJ, Pearson ES. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26:404–413.
-
- Cooke RWI, Lucas A, Yudkin PLN, Pryse-Davies J. Head circumference as an index of brain weight in the fetus and newborn. Early Hum Dev. 1977;1:145–149. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical